「deterministic」の検索結果

The measurement surface for ALL Pulp DSP and audio-pipeline work — read it BEFORE writing or gating DSP, not only when something already sounds wrong. Covers the C++ harness (signal generators, metrics, assertions, RenderScenario, contracts), the offline Audio Doctor (magnitude/frequency response, THD/THD+N, phase/group delay), and their Python sibling the Audio Quality Lab (tools/audio/quality-lab — null residual + alignment, LTAS log-spectral distance, spectral flux/centroid, HNR, Theil-Sen drift slope, Kaiser-sinc resampling, license-guarded corpus, regression-net ratchet). TRIGGER on AUTHORING work — "build/design an oscillator/filter/synth/effect", "add a DSP module", "what should the acceptance gate be", "how do I measure aliasing / anti-aliasing / alias floor", "null against a reference", "is this DSP correct", "choose a tolerance", "golden/regression corpus for audio", "measure drift or jitter", "A/B two renders" — AND on DEBUGGING work — "is there sound / no audio / I hear nothing", "does this filter/compressor/synth/delay produce the right signal", "prove the DSP / prove the contract", "measure the frequency response", "what's the THD / is it distorting", "what's the group delay / phase response / measured latency", "magnitude response curve", "render a test tone and assert", "audio regression", "64-frame works but 128 is silent", "sample-rate change pitch-shifted it", "describe what's in this buffer", "audio doctor", "compare before/after a DSP refactor". Reach for this BEFORE hand-rolling any FFT, null test, alias measurement, pitch tracker, or golden-render script — most of it already exists in one of the two lanes. Test/tool layer over HeadlessHost — deterministic, no audio device, no speakers. Off the realtime thread entirely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

N-round adversarial review pipeline for empirical research output — the chain from data to LaTeX tables to a manuscript that cites them. A Claude drafter proposes minimal diffs, a deterministic mechanical battery gates every diff from a clean state with a regression gate, a Codex reviewer files check-backed critiques, and a blind judge panel decides residual disputes. Manual-invoke ONLY: trigger when the user explicitly runs /adversarial-empirical-review or names 'adversarial-empirical-review' / 'adversarial empirical review'. Do NOT auto-trigger on generic 'review my results', 'check my tables', or manuscript-editing requests. For prose-style refinement use style-emulation instead; this skill AUDITS WHETHER THE TABLES ARE CORRECT — that each number in the tables is what the analysis code computes, reproduces from the data, and is internally consistent. It is an empirical + code review: the manuscript is read only to resolve table numbering, and prose is not examined.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured 6-phase debugging. Build feedback loop first, reproduce deterministically, hypothesize with ranked falsifiable theories, instrument one variable at a time, fix with regression test, cleanup. Use when a bug exists, tests fail unexpectedly, or behavior is wrong and cause is unknown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect non-deterministic (flaky) tests by reading CI run logs or test result history. Aggregates pass rates per test, identifies intermittent failures, recommends quarantine or fix, and maintains a flaky test registry. Best run during Polish phase or after multiple CI runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating or editing diagrams, charts, visual assets, posters, UI mockups, product images, infographics, academic figures, comics, avatars, storyboards, brand boards, or image-edit workflows, especially when exported PNGs need visual QA and bounded self-repair. Prefer deterministic Mermaid/SVG/HTML/canvas sources for text-heavy diagrams; use HTML technical diagrams for browser-ready system blueprints, architecture, deployment topology, agent runtime, memory flow, before-after architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, lifecycle, runbook, PII/data-lineage, and state-machine diagrams. Do not use for ordinary UI polish without generated imagery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Playwright-first strategy for shared DB + shared test accounts. Use when E2E tests collide in QA/staging, need safe parallelism, or require deterministic cleanup without touching baseline data. Covers per-test ownership, namespacing, ID-based teardown, serial shared-state suites, and optional stale-data janitor jobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this when the user wants to generate, normalize, verify, deduplicate, or export training datasets for Codex, Antigravity, or Claude Code from topics, URLs, reference material, web research, or existing JSONL/CSV files. Supports SFT and DPO workflows, custom export schemas, and deterministic local pipeline scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FrontendHire's job-search operating system (fh) — a strict pipeline tracker, deterministic weekly metrics, and a review ritual. Runs the search as a measured system where the philosophy is law. Use for logging applications/leads/referral asks, the weekly review, status/metrics, and the onboarding interview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse natural-language quantities, units, dates, and ranges ("5'11\"", "1.5 cups", "72 in to cm", "three days ago", "between 5 and 10 kg", "it's hot") into canonical, validated values with issue codes and spans — and humanize them back. Use when a form input, LLM tool schema, MCP handler, or import pipeline takes free-text measurements/units/dates. Covers Standard Schema fields (quantityField/dateField/lingoObject) for the AI SDK and MCP, the headless <lingo-input>, unit conversion, and format/humanize round-trips. Zero-dependency TypeScript, deterministic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Fable-derived 10-stage OBSERVE, OBSERVE, LISTEN, THINK, CONNECT, CONNECT, FEEL, ACCEPT, CREATE, GROW loop to consequential or ambiguous reasoning and decisions. Use for think this through, deep think, architecture review, postmortem, tradeoff analysis, or challenges to assumptions. This is a reasoning review, not a deterministic vault health check or repair workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and query a vault-local contextual BM25 retrieval index with optional multilingual Nomic cosine reranking; use for retrieve, hybrid retrieval, BM25, rerank, contextual retrieval, chunk search, vault search, semantic search, find relevant passages, or retrieval diagnostics. Derived caches stay under .vault-meta, remote egress requires explicit consent, and unavailable reranking falls back deterministically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a deterministic, read-only health check on an Obsidian wiki. Use for lint, vault health check, audit wiki health, find orphans, find dead links, frontmatter audit, provenance audit, or wiki audit. Reports graph, link, frontmatter, provenance-ledger, empty-section, and stale-index findings; it does not reason broadly or repair files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design Invocable Apex actions that return deterministic, agent-friendly errors instead of surfacing raw exceptions to the LLM. NOT for authoring the action itself — @InvocableMethod schema, labels, security context — use agentforce/custom-agent-actions-apex. NOT for the Apex tests that force each error branch — use agentforce/agent-action-unit-tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apex test patterns for @InvocableMethod agent actions: per-reason-code branch coverage, bulk safety, callout mocking, deterministic assertions. NOT for testing whether the agent routes to the right topic or answers well — use agentforce/agent-testing-and-evaluation. NOT for designing the error envelope the tests assert on — use agentforce/agent-action-error-handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Print the localhost URL for The Luminarium — moflo's daemon dashboard — for the current project. Use when the user asks for "the luminarium link", "the moflo dashboard", "the daemon UI", or anything synonymous. Each project gets a deterministic port in 33000–33999; the actual bound port is recorded in `.moflo/daemon.lock`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mechanical consistency check for game design — answers "is the design consistent with itself?" — plus changed-scope impact analysis across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Offline and deterministic: greps the facts registry against the documents (numbers, terms, IDs, duplicate & dangling references, roster↔disk, map freshness, Depends 3-way, status/version, AC presence, placeholder leaks, flow & content schema), and from a git diff computes which dependent systems, flows, and content a change affects. Scope is inferred: a named document checks that document; an unverified diff triggers a changed-scope pass; otherwise everything. Use when the user wants a consistency or impact check, e.g. "verify the design", "what did this change affect", "find broken references in the design". Conflicts triage into four tracks; the entailed fixes hand off to /unikit-gd-apply in one pass. This is the mechanical pass — for a subjective "is this design good" quality critique use /unikit-gd-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persistent per-project memory for Claude Code. Auto-loads project context on session start, tracks sessions with git activity, and writes to native memory. Commands run deterministic Node.js scripts — behavior is consistent across model versions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when recording, tallying, or triaging stochastic review findings — the append-only JSONL ledger where Tier 2 (advisory, unevidenced) reviewer output goes instead of blocking language. Triggers on "log this finding", "ledger add", "tally the findings", "triage findings", "is this finding recurring", "retire this noise", or whenever a reviewer produces an unevidenced concern that should be measured for recurrence rather than chased. For the review itself see code-review-and-quality or skill-library-review; for verifying formal claims with deterministic evidence see adversarial-claims-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep behavioral security audit for AI agent skills and MCP tools. Performs deterministic static analysis (AST + Semgrep + 15 specialized scanners), cryptographic lockfile generation, and optional LLM-powered intent analysis. Use when installing, reviewing, or approving any skill, tool, plugin, or MCP server — especially before first use. Replaces basic safety summaries with full CWE-mapped, OWASP-tagged, line-referenced security reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A high-performance validation layer for autonomous agent consistency on Polygon PoS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render Aavegotchi assets by deriving renderer hashes from Goldsky Base core data and calling POST /api/renderer/batch on www.aavegotchi.com. Use when the user gives a tokenId or inventory URL, or when deterministic hash plus image artifacts are required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render Aavegotchi assets by deriving renderer hashes from Goldsky Base core data and calling POST /api/renderer/batch on www.aavegotchi.com. Use when the user gives a tokenId or inventory URL, or when deterministic hash plus image artifacts are required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security launch audit for a public web app BEFORE you ship or hand it to a client — "vibe coders are getting sued", systematized. An executable pipeline: classify (static / full-stack / AI) → run sections (secrets+supply-chain, DB, auth, infra+headers, legal, LLM/injection) orchestrating deterministic tools + manual checks → GO/NO-GO report. Adapted from Prajwal Tomar's playbook, extended with prompt-injection / supply-chain / secret-history / dependency-CVE layers. NOT the same as pre-push (that = clean push; this = is the product itself safe to launch). Triggers — "security checklist for the site", "audit before launch", "is the site safe", "check before handing to client".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。