「fid」の検索結果

Analyze source code statically to detect potential functional bugs including null dereferences, incorrect condition checks, unreachable code, inconsistent state updates, logic errors, resource leaks, and type mismatches. Report suspicious code locations with detailed explanations, severity levels, and confidence assessments. Use when reviewing code for bugs, performing code audits, or when the user asks to find bugs, detect issues, analyze code for problems, or perform static analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically performs git bisect to identify the first bad commit that introduced a bug or failure. Use when debugging regressions, tracking down when a test started failing, or identifying which commit broke functionality. Handles flaky tests with retry logic and provides comprehensive reports with bisect logs and confidence levels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify the precise location of bugs in source code, modules, and systems. Use this skill when debugging applications, investigating test failures, analyzing error reports, tracing runtime issues, or performing root cause analysis. Analyzes stack traces, error messages, failing tests, and code patterns to pinpoint buggy functions, classes, files, or modules with confidence rankings and supporting evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert image references into spatial hypotheses, camera constraints, construction routes, material evidence, and measurable Blender reconstruction gates. Use whenever a user asks to replicate, recreate, match, clone, or reconstruct a scene, environment, object, material, lighting setup, or shot from one or more images, especially when room connectivity, hidden space, perspective, visible-frame fidelity, material identity, aging, wetness, or photographic treatment matters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define production-ready visual intent for Blender scenes and standalone assets, including focal hierarchy, depth layers, visual flow, scale and repetition rhythm, camera mobility, representation fidelity, and performance budgets. Use for original or reference-guided Blender work before construction choices are executed, especially environments, architecture, products, hero assets, or scenes whose modeling quality depends on coordinated spatial design rather than isolated objects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research customer questions by searching across documentation, knowledge bases, and connected sources, then synthesize a confidence-scored answer. Use when a customer asks a question you need to investigate, when building background on a customer situation, or when you need account context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combines search results from multiple sources into coherent, deduplicated answers with source attribution. Handles confidence scoring based on freshness and authority, and summarizes large result sets effectively.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web performance audits with Core Web Vitals, bottleneck identification, optimization recommendations. Use for page load times, performance reviews, UX optimization, or encountering LCP, FID, CLS issues, resource blocking, render delays.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the weak-agent adversarial test harness against docx-cli. Spawns weak exercise agents (Haiku by default, Sonnet to probe, or a local agent harness's pre-produced runs) to perform real document tasks over six scenarios — five editing (MNDA form-fill + font fidelity, invoice table-edit/restructure + logo replace, résumé styling, contract redlining + commenting, contract finalize via accept/reject + comment reply/resolve) and one authoring (T. S. Eliot poetry journal: multi-column, verse, footnotes, links, figure) — renders every result with Word, has opus judge them against ground-truth rubrics, measures each exercise's tool economy, token cost, wall-clock, and correctness (from transcripts for Claude, the exercise.json ledger for the local harness), and synthesizes a prioritized ergonomics report. Use when the user says 'adversarial review', 'test docx-cli with weak agents', 'run the haiku harness', 'weak agent test', or wants to re-run yesterday's adversarial process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break down full NeurIPS reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains NeurIPS reviewer fields (Summary, Strengths and Weaknesses, Questions, Limitations) and numeric scores (Rating, Confidence, Quality, Clarity, Significance, Originality). Splits questions and limitations into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break down full ARR (ACL Rolling Review) reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains ARR reviewer fields (Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Comments/Suggestions) and numeric scores (Confidence, Soundness, Excitement, Overall Assessment, Reproducibility). Splits weaknesses and comments/suggestions into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect, extract, OCR, create, merge, split, reorder, rotate, annotate, fill, redact, compress, secure, and verify PDF documents while preserving source files and visual fidelity. Use when working with one or more .pdf files; converting documents to or from PDF; extracting text, tables, images, metadata, forms, or page ranges; applying true redactions or signatures; diagnosing malformed, encrypted, scanned, or inaccessible PDFs; or validating that a PDF transformation preserved the intended content and layout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create text-based wireframes at low, mid, and high fidelity with component inventories, interaction annotations, and responsive breakpoint specifications. Use when the user requests wireframing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Extremophile Biologist. Use when a task calls for Extremophile Biologist judgment. Reason from physicochemical limits—T, pH, salinity, pressure, and redox—as filters on membrane chemistry, osmoadaptation, chaperones, and cultivation fidelity before astrobiology or extremozyme claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Economic Geologist. Use when a task calls for Economic Geologist judgment. Reasons from mineral systems and deposit-type models (porphyry, VMS, orogenic Au, SEDEX, IOCG) through regolith and lithogeochemistry, LA-ICP-MS sulfide fingerprinting, and geophysical vectors to JORC/CIM/NI 43-101 MRE domaining, variography, OK/MIK estimation, and classification while treating transported regolith, dispersion shadows, pXRF false highs, and Inferred-overclaim as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Deep Learning Scientist. Use when a task calls for Deep Learning Scientist judgment. Reasons from CNN/Transformer inductive bias, Li et al. loss landscapes, grokking/mode connectivity, and Kaplan/Chinchilla scaling (~20 tokens/param); designs ResNet/ViT/DiT/MoE/FlashAttention stacks with FLOPs-matched ablations; trains AdamW+cosine/WSD via Megatron-FSDP/DeepSpeed; evaluates FID/MMLU-Pro/MMLU-CF with lm-eval decontamination and Pineau/NeurIPS reproducibility checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify emerging trends early by monitoring signals across Twitter trending, TikTok viral content, YouTube rising videos, Google News velocity, and Reddit community buzz. Combines platform-specific trend indicators into a unified trend confidence score.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze sentiment in any text — reviews, social posts, feedback, or articles. Returns sentiment polarity (positive, negative, neutral), confidence score, and key phrases driving the sentiment. Useful for brand monitoring, customer feedback analysis, and content evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research any topic in exhaustive depth by combining web search, academic papers, social discussions, and community conversations. Produces comprehensive briefings with evidence from every available source type, confidence scoring, and identified knowledge gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce short-form video with Pika (pika.art) — its effect-driven tools (Pikaffects, Pikadditions, Pikaswaps, Pikaframes, Pikascenes, Pikatwists) and audio-driven lip sync (Pikaformance), plus text-to-video and image-to-video. Use when a task calls for playful, stylized, meme-able social clips, or for applying generative effects and object swaps to real uploaded footage, and when deciding whether Pika is the right engine versus a higher-fidelity model. Covers model versions, credit/plan economics, the fal.ai API route, prompt construction, iteration/repair, capability limits, and consent/rights rules for uploaded real-person media. Not a general "best video model" chooser.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local and self-hosted text-to-speech with Kokoro, the ~82M-parameter open-weight (Apache 2.0) model by hexgrad. Use when synthesizing speech offline, on-device, in the browser, or on your own server without per-character API cost — for high-volume narration, audiobooks, privacy-constrained pipelines, and prototyping. Covers running Kokoro via the Python `kokoro` package, ONNX / kokoro-js in the browser, and the OpenAI-compatible Kokoro-FastAPI wrapper; picking voices and language codes; blending voices; chunking long text; controlling pronunciation via misaki/espeak-ng; and judging when Kokoro is the right tool versus when its lack of voice cloning, narrow emotional range, and weaker non-English quality mean you should reach for a hosted or larger model instead. Not for voice cloning, expressive/emotional character performance, or high-fidelity multilingual work — say so and route elsewhere.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when an agent needs Google Cloud Vision API for still-image understanding: labels, object localization, OCR, document text, SafeSearch, image properties, crop hints, web detection, batch annotation, Cloud Storage based pipelines, confidence evaluation, privacy, quotas, cost, and QA. Do not use it for Gemini multimodal reasoning, video analysis, image generation, custom model training, product catalog search design, or human reference/authenticity review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce 3D assets with Tripo (tripo3d.ai / Tripo AI by VAST) through its OpenAPI and Studio platform — text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and multiview-to-3D generation; PBR texturing; auto-rigging and preset animation; retopology/low-poly and quad remesh; format conversion (GLB/FBX/OBJ/USDZ/STL/3MF) and engine import (Unity/Unreal/Blender/3D printing). Use when an agent must drive the async task-based Tripo API (create task, poll or webhook, download), choose a model version (v3.0 / v3.1 / P1), write prompts or prepare input images, control mesh/texture parameters, estimate credits and respect rate limits, review generated mesh quality (topology, UVs, poly count, texture fidelity), run iteration and repair workflows, or reason about the rights/licensing of Tripo-generated assets. Trigger on requests to generate, texture, rig, animate, retopologize, convert, or evaluate a 3D model with Tripo, or to integrate the Tripo API into a pipeline. Not for choosing a 3D renderer, editing meshes by hand, or non-Tripo generators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。