「focus」の検索結果

Designs slide decks and one-pagers that carry an argument rather than decorate one — deck structure, headlines that state the takeaway, charts that make a single point, and the different rules board decks and conference talks follow. Use this to build or fix a pitch deck, board deck, or conference talk, to design a one-pager, or when a deck is dense, unfocused, or being read aloud from the slides. For social graphics, carousels and infographics, use `marketing:visual-content` instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The period feel comes from camera defects and one tiny everyday incident. Write the camcorder's autofocus hunting, exposure shifts and handheld shake as an explicit list, keep the story small, and the clip reads as a real old tape. Use when the user wants a Seedance 2.5 / 2.0 video prompt for this kind of clip (Early-2000s DV home video; 中文触发词: 早年 DV 家庭录像, DV, 家庭录像, VHS, 复古, 年代感), or asks how published cases of this type were prompted. Read references/cases.md before drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Type text into input fields on webpage. When you need to fill forms, enter search queries, or input data. PREREQUISITE - must use browser_navigate first. May need to click field first for focus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive security and correctness audit of a branch's changes. Use for thermo nuclear, thermonuclear, or deep review requests, or branch/PR diff audits focused on bugs, breaking changes, security issues, devex regressions, and feature-gate leaks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find failing PR checks, inspect logs or external check links, and apply focused fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft IACUC protocol applications with focus on the 3Rs principles justification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs discovery, modeling, and validation workflows for prognostic biomarkers in biomedical and clinical research. Always use this skill when the user needs a prognostic biomarker study blueprint rather than a diagnostic test protocol, predictive biomarker design, treatment recommendation, or a completed manuscript. Focus on endpoint family, follow-up horizon, time scale, candidate marker strategy, model-building logic, risk stratification framework, and internal/external validation requirements. Do not invent cohort size, event rate, assay readiness, literature support, or validation access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs studies for predicting treatment response or resistance in biomedical and clinical research. Always use this skill when the user needs a treatment-response or resistance prediction study blueprint rather than a prognostic biomarker protocol, diagnostic test design, causal treatment-effect estimation, or a completed manuscript. Focus on responder definition, treatment context, baseline comparability, feature integration strategy, model development logic, validation architecture, and interpretation boundaries. Do not invent response rates, cohort size, assay readiness, regimen uniformity, literature support, or validation access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs primary, secondary, and exploratory endpoints for biomedical and clinical research protocols. Always use this skill when a user needs to translate study aims into operational endpoint definitions with event rules, assessment timing, composite logic, interpretability, and protocol-stage auditability. Focus on endpoint precision, feasibility, clinical meaning, ambiguity reduction, and implementation readiness rather than generic study design advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds clear, executable, and auditable inclusion and exclusion criteria for biomedical and clinical research protocols. Always use this skill when a user needs to translate a target population into operational screening rules tied to chart fields, time windows, tests, procedures, prior therapies, exclusions, and reviewable edge cases. Focus on protocol-stage precision, ambiguity reduction, auditability, and screening reproducibility rather than generic study design advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refines broad, vague, or aspirational biomedical research objectives into clear, bounded, measurable, executable, and downstream-ready study objective statements. Always use this skill when a user has a general aim such as “explore a mechanism,” “study prognosis,” “investigate biomarkers,” or “look at treatment response,” but the objective is still too broad, non-operational, or too ambiguous to support protocol framing, design selection, analysis planning, or hypothesis design. Never assume that polished wording alone means the objective is actionable. Focus first on objective type, missing operational elements, scope discipline, and downstream-ready formulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares multiple study-route options for the same biomedical research question and recommends one primary plan, while explicitly explaining why alternative routes are secondary, premature, weaker, or dependency-heavy. Always use this skill when the user already has a reasonably defined question but is unsure which main study route should anchor the project. Focus on plan comparison, route selection, dependency awareness, and primary-plan justification rather than full protocol drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a realistic, execution-aware biomedical study version under explicit constraints of samples, time, budget, data access, lab capacity, team skill, and validation resources. Always use this skill when the user has a real study idea, a candidate route, or a partially framed project but cannot assume ideal conditions. If critical feasibility inputs are missing, first clarify what resources are currently available, what resources may be obtainable, and what resources are realistically unavailable. Do not invent access, capabilities, collaborations, or validation resources. Focus first on feasibility-constrained study framing, route narrowing, dependency control, and minimum viable study design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs retrospective or prospective clinical cohort study protocols for biomedical and clinical research. Always use this skill when the user needs a cohort-based study plan rather than a general study idea, evidence summary, or mechanistic experiment design. Focus on cohort appropriateness, enrollment logic, baseline time-zero definition, follow-up structure, endpoint definition, variable collection, confounding control, and a coherent primary statistical analysis line. Do not invent data availability, follow-up completeness, outcome ascertainment quality, sample size adequacy, or causal interpretability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects overlooked, underrepresented, weakly resolved, or poorly validated populations and subgroups within a biomedical research area so users can identify more precise and meaningful study populations. Always use this skill when the real question is not just what is under-studied, but which populations, strata, or subgroups are missing, thinly represented, superficially analyzed, pooled without resolution, or insufficiently validated in the current evidence base. Focus on meaningful subgroup gaps rather than generic calls for diversity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineers the methods section of a biomedical paper into a structured, reproducible workflow. Use this skill when a user wants to understand how a study was actually executed, extract data sources, inclusion/exclusion logic, preprocessing, analytical sequence, software/tools, validation path, and critical parameters, or build a replication checklist from a paper, abstract, DOI, PMID, title, screenshot, or partial methods text. Do not treat this as generic summarization. Focus on reconstructing the operational method pipeline, surfacing missing reproducibility details, and distinguishing explicitly reported steps from inferred or unresolved ones. Never fabricate references, methods details, identifiers, software versions, parameters, datasets, or validation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarifies a vague clinical or biomedical research idea into a structured, bounded, searchable, researchable, and testable question. Always use this skill whenever a user has an early-stage clinical or research thought, an over-broad topic, an ill-defined evidence question, or an unclear problem statement that must be translated into a question framing suitable for literature retrieval, evidence synthesis, gap analysis, study design, or downstream protocol planning. Never jump straight to answering the substantive medical question unless the user explicitly asks for that. Focus first on question framing, boundary setting, and downstream-ready formulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures research progress into focused and actionable slides for lab meetings or project reviews without inventing missing content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating Prem Watsa / Fairfax-style value investing: insurance float, contrarian allocation, special situations, and conservative downside-focused capital allocation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating stocks through Qiu Guolu's value-quality lens: stay within circle of competence, focus on industry leaders with structural advantages, and demand simple clear thesis before investing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating stocks through Dan Bin's long-term compounder lens: buy great companies, hold through volatility, and let time do the work. Focus on consumer, pharma, and tech compounders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Findings-first code review workflow for AI coding agents. Use when the user asks to review uncommitted changes, commits in a date range, or a branch compared to the main branch / PR-style diff. Focuses on bugs, regressions, correctness risks, missing tests, security/data-safety issues, and other behavior-changing defects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Single entry skill for open-websearch setup and focused live retrieval, preferring local CLI/daemon paths while remaining compatible with workspace-exposed MCP tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。