1,721 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Design production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage environment-variable hygiene and secrets safety across local development and production. Practical auditing, drift awareness, rotation readiness. Use when auditing .env files for committed secrets, planning a credential rotation, debugging missing-env-var production incidents, or hardening a new project against secrets leakage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity across all business functions simultaneously. Use when facing complex risk scenarios, strategic decisions with major downside, or when the user asks 'what if X AND Y both happen?'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an RFP, RFI, RFQ, security questionnaire, vendor questionnaire, or proposal request arrives and the team needs a structured response — parsing multi-section buyer-dictated requirements (MANDATORY vs WEIGHTED vs NICE-TO-HAVE), building a Shipley-method proof-point matrix mapping each requirement to a verifiable proof point, articulating 3-5 win-themes that ladder up across requirements, and producing a Shipley-derived winrate estimate that informs a bid / no-bid / partner-bid recommendation. For Bid Managers, Proposal Leads, Directors of Sales, and Sales Engineers at the response-strategy moment. Surfaces GAP requirements explicitly — never invents claims. NOT free-form proposal narrative authoring, NOT contract redline, NOT marketing collateral.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says 'no hallucinations', 'verify APIs', 'reality check', or 'don't invent functions'. Prevents the agent from calling methods, imports, or variables that do not provably exist in the user's installed version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the Figma MCP server to fetch design context, screenshots, variables, and assets from Figma, and to translate Figma nodes into production code. Trigger when a task involves Figma URLs, node IDs, design-to-code implementation, or Figma MCP setup and troubleshooting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build or update a professional-grade design system in Figma from a codebase. Use when the user wants to create variables/tokens, build component libraries, set up theming (light/dark modes), document foundations, or reconcile gaps between code and Figma. This skill teaches WHAT to build and in WHAT ORDER — it complements the `figma-use` skill which teaches HOW to call the Plugin API. Both skills should be loaded together.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill alongside figma-use when the task involves translating an application page, view, or multi-section layout into Figma. Triggers: 'write to Figma', 'create in Figma from code', 'push page to Figma', 'take this app/page and build it in Figma', 'create a screen', 'build a landing page in Figma', 'update the Figma screen to match code'. This is the preferred workflow skill whenever the user wants to build or update a full page, screen, or view in Figma from code or a description. Discovers design system components, variables, and styles via search_design_system, imports them, and assembles screens incrementally section-by-section using design system tokens instead of hardcoded values.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The durable documentation set that makes an AI-built (vibe-coded) app reviewable before shipping. A small core every app needs — architecture, user/permission flows, permissions, variables/secrets, and a test-coverage map — plus conditional docs added only when they apply: emails, scheduled work, SEO, and embedded agents/automation. Defines what each doc must capture and how a reviewer or auditor uses it. Use when documenting a codebase for handoff, mapping user journeys and trust-boundary crossings, planning test coverage, or preparing for a security or performance audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea in an existing product across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility. Uses multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking. Use when stress-testing a feature idea, doing risk assessment, or preparing for assumption mapping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude Skills meta-skill: extract domain material (docs/APIs/code/specs) into a reusable Skill (SKILL.md + references/scripts/assets), and refactor existing Skills for clarity, activation reliability, and quality gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate n8n expression syntax and fix common errors. Use when writing n8n expressions, using {{}} syntax, accessing $json/$node variables, troubleshooting expression errors, mapping data between nodes, or referencing webhook data in workflows. Use this skill whenever configuring node fields that reference data from previous nodes — expressions are how n8n passes data between nodes, and getting the syntax wrong is the most common source of workflow errors. Also use when asked whether a complex expression hurts performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Poll AI-Trader heartbeat and notifications reliably through the primary pull-based mechanism.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides recommendations for environmental sustainability, carbon footprint reduction, and energy efficiency based on the Sustainability pillar of the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework (WAF). Use when the user asks to assess, design, or optimize Google Cloud workloads for sustainability—including the shared responsibility model, selecting low-carbon regions (CFE%), reducing resource and AI/ML energy waste, designing efficient software and storage lifecycles, or measuring and tracking emissions using Google Cloud Carbon Footprint. Don't use for financial cost reduction (use google-cloud-waf-cost-optimization), latency and throughput tuning (use google-cloud-waf-performance-optimization), or high availability and disaster recovery (use google-cloud-waf-reliability).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits Filestore instances on Google Cloud across projects for disaster recovery readiness (missing or stale backups), security access governance (overly permissive NFS export rules, 0.0.0.0/0 exposure, missing ROOT_SQUASH), and reliability compliance (Physical Zone Isolation PZI and Physical Zone Separation PZS). Use when assessing storage health posture, auditing NFS export permissions, identifying unprotected file shares, or validating zone failure domains. Don't use for Cloud Storage buckets, Persistent Disk, or NetApp Volumes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides diagnostic workflows and step-by-step root-cause analysis procedures for actively broken, failing, or slow BigQuery jobs, execution graph and query plan stage bottlenecks, system performance issues, or unexpectedly expensive workloads. Use when interpreting symptoms, isolating bottlenecks, diagnosing cost spikes (on-demand query spend, capacity slot autoscaling, storage growth), execution graph stages or substep variables, identifying root causes, and determining remediation steps. Don't use for writing or optimizing SQL, proactive capacity planning, or storage layout design (use bigquery-optimization), or when the user already knows which telemetry they want and just needs the query (use bigquery-observability).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The scientific method as a universal problem-solving algorithm — goal-first, plural falsifiable hypotheses, designed experiments, and honest measurement, scaling from TDD to feature validation to MVP launch. USE WHEN think about, figure out, experiment, iterate, optimize, hypothesis, science, full cycle, quick diagnosis, structured investigation, how do we test, analyze results. NOT FOR multi-angle lens passes (use IterativeDepth).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A comprehensive collection of Agent Skills for context engineering, harness engineering, multi-agent architectures, and production agent systems. Use when building, optimizing, evaluating, or debugging agent systems that require effective context management and reliable operating loops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude Skills meta-skill: extract domain material (docs/APIs/code/specs) into a reusable Skill (SKILL.md + references/scripts/assets), and refactor existing Skills for clarity, activation reliability, and quality gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author Quarkdown (.qd) documents, a Markdown-superset typesetting language that compiles to HTML, PDF, or plaintext. Use when the user wants to write or edit .qd files, produce typeset output (articles, reports, slides, books, wikis, notes, static sites) beyond what plain Markdown offers, or share structured plans in a presentation-ready format. Quarkdown adds function calls (`.func {arg}`), variables, layouts, math, diagrams, and document types (plain/paged/slides/docs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Downloads CARLA so nothing has to be fetched by hand — an official release package for any published version (resolved live from the GitHub releases, with AdditionalMaps), the rolling nightly Dev build, a shallow source checkout of a branch or tag, or the carlasim/carla Docker image. Reports exactly what was obtained and where, plus the environment variables the other skills read. Use when the user asks to "download CARLA", "get CARLA 0.9.16", "install CARLA", "clone the carla repo", "fetch the latest CARLA", or has no CARLA at all yet.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compiles any research input — PDF papers, GitHub repositories, experiment logs, code directories, or raw notes — into a complete Agent-Native Research Artifact (ARA) with cognitive layer (claims, concepts, heuristics), physical layer (configs, code stubs), exploration graph, and grounded evidence. Use when ingesting a paper or codebase into a structured, machine-executable knowledge package, building an ARA from scratch, or converting research outputs into a falsifiable, agent-traversable form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。