474 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Prepare customer or executive business reviews with outcome tracking, adoption health, ROI narrative, risks, commitments, and next-quarter plan using customer success and CX frameworks. Use when teams need QBRs, success plans, churn-risk conversations, or executive account reviews. Do not use for generic slide beautification or cold outreach prospecting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build structured 3-scenario financial models (Base / Bull / Bear) for business planning or investment decisions. Sensitize revenue and cost drivers across scenarios, produce P&L summaries, cash flow bridges, and executive narratives. Aligns with FP&A 2.0 and CIMA Management Accounting standards. Use when leadership needs to understand the financial impact range of a decision. Do not use for statutory financial reporting or audit-ready financials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate level design team: level-designer + narrative-director + world-builder + art-director + systems-designer + qa-tester for complete area/level creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and revise rigorous research narratives, literature reviews, manuscript sections, citations, and figure discussions. Use for technical introductions, methods, results, discussions, review articles, abstracts, or related-work sections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a professional author — drafting or structurally revising a novel or narrative-nonfiction manuscript, writing a query letter or book proposal, evaluating a publishing contract's royalty and rights terms, or diagnosing why a manuscript is getting rejected.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a tenure-track or tenured Agricultural Sciences faculty member at a land-grant university — deciding whether to submit a grant this cycle versus wait, allocating time across the teaching/research/extension appointment split, diagnosing a stalled graduate student or field trial, or drafting a tenure-and-promotion dossier narrative.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Area, Ethnic, or Cultural Studies Professor — designing a joint-appointment course load across two departments, prepping a tenure or mid-tenure review file for interdisciplinary scholarship, deciding whether a course survives an enrollment or political-pressure threat, evaluating community-engaged research for a merit case, or writing a Title VI/FLAS-adjacent grant narrative.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explains complex code through clear narratives, visual diagrams, and step-by-step breakdowns. Use when user asks to explain code, understand algorithms, analyze design patterns, wants code walkthroughs, or mentions "explain this code", "how does this work", "code breakdown", or "understand this function".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write engaging PR titles and descriptions for any forge (GitHub today; Bitbucket planned). Use when creating or updating PRs. Leads with narrative paragraphs and reaches for lists, tables, and diagrams when content is genuinely structured.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create comics and graphic narratives with panel flow, lettering, pacing, and visual storytelling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write complete business plans — executive summary, market analysis, financials, and investor-ready narratives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a grant management system for proposal workflow efficiency, deadline tracking, budget-narrative alignment, outcome reporting, compliance readiness, and win rate optimization. Use when reviewing nonprofit grant software, building a grants CRM, analyzing proposal pipelines, or evaluating funder reporting tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write customer case studies and success stories using the Situation-Complication-Resolution (SCR) narrative framework and Barbara Minto's Pyramid Principle (conclusion first). Produces case studies where the headline states the result, the complication makes readers recognize their own situation, and every paragraph advances the story. Use when the user asks for a case study, customer story, customer success story, win story, reference write-up, or "turn this customer into a case study". Reads brand voice and service catalog from knowledge/. For a press announcement, see press-release-writer. For pitching the story to media, see pr-pitch-writer. For repurposing it into social, see content-repurposer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build branded PowerPoint decks (.pptx) for pitches, internal updates, sales decks, customer QBRs, board updates, conference talks using the Pyramid Principle and SCQA framework (Barbara Minto, The Minto Pyramid Principle). Every deck starts with the answer - conclusion on slide 2, evidence after. Slide titles are conclusions, not topics. Use when the user asks for a deck, presentation, slides, pitch deck, sales deck, board deck, QBR, "make slides for X", or "build a presentation". Uses templates/ for brand assets. Generates structured slide content with speaker notes. For the narrative content of the deck, see thought-leadership-writer or campaign-brief. For a case study slide, see case-study-writer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure a consulting findings presentation using the Pyramid Principle storyline. Use when a consultant says "help me structure my presentation", "I have findings and need to present them", "how do I structure the deck", "build me the storyline", "help me tell the story of the findings", "I have data but no narrative", "client presentation is next week", "how do I present recommendations to the steering committee", or "the deck needs a through-line". Also trigger when someone has completed analysis and needs to communicate findings and recommendations to senior client stakeholders in a structured, persuasive format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze budget vs. actual variances, identify root causes, and recommend corrective actions. Use when an accountant or finance professional says "explain this variance", "budget vs. actual analysis", "why did we miss budget", "favorable / unfavorable variance", "price volume variance", "management reporting commentary", "explain the P&L variance to the CFO", "what drove the cost overrun", "revenue shortfall analysis", or needs to write the narrative behind a financial result. Also trigger when someone shares a table of actuals vs. budget and needs to explain the gaps - even if they don't use the word "variance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Communicate data insights to non-technical stakeholders in a structured, persuasive format. Use when the user says "present these findings", "explain this analysis to leadership", "make a data presentation", "tell the story behind the data", "translate this into a business narrative", "make this insight actionable", "stakeholder readout", "executive summary of results", or needs to turn analysis output into a decision-ready document or slide deck.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Judges whether a user's input suits the Vibe Creating style of video-prompt writing, and when it does, distills single-scene prompts, multi-shot descriptions, emotional imagery, or mixed input into prompts that are easier for a video model to generate from — while preserving any user-specified dialogue, voiceover, music, sound effects, and other hard constraints. Use when a user wants to turn an idea, story, feeling, or rough/over-specified prompt into a strong text-to-video prompt (Seedance, Sora, Kling, Veo, Runway, etc.), or asks to "rewrite", "improve", "clean up", or "vibe-ify" a video prompt. Do NOT use for long narrative films that need precise word-for-word dialogue sync, industrial shot lists meant to be executed verbatim, or functional/UI demos and step-by-step tutorials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user gives a topic and wants an automated topic-driven narrated explainer, podcast, or knowledge-summary video (Bilibili / YouTube / Xiaohongshu / Douyin / WeChat Channels), or asks to learn visual design patterns from a reference video/image. Trigger when the user mentions creating a knowledge video, narrated explainer, video podcast, or animated infographic-style video from a topic — even if they don't say "video podcast" explicitly. Also trigger when the user wants to regenerate, re-render, rebuild, update, or iterate on a narrated video this skill already produced — e.g. they edited the script/prompt, changed the visuals, or swapped the background music and want the final video remade (reuse the existing videos/{name}/ directory, never start a new project). Do NOT trigger for generic video editing, trimming, format conversion, color grading, or non-narrative video tasks. Produces 4K video via research → script → TTS → Remotion → MP4 + BGM.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stops defensive writing across the entire paper lifecycle — writing, revising, cutting, and organizing experiments. Treats the paper as a press conference, not a project summary, lab log, or self-audit: identify the single most publishable strength of the work and build the most favorable, complete, and persuasive narrative around it. Never present everything evenly, never volunteer weakness, never write an experiment diary, never attack the paper on the reviewer's behalf. Triggers: polish my paper, revise manuscript, write abstract, write introduction, write conclusion, shorten paper, rebuttal, respond to reviewers, organize experiments, defensive writing, AI-flavored academic writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble a finished piece from human-written fragments via an orchestrated two-loop pipeline - an assembly loop (assembler + cold reviewer) that sequences the fragments into a draft, then a polish loop (polisher + cold reviewer), then frequency analysis and a catalog-deslop pass with a regression gate. Two modes with opposite fidelity contracts - stitch mode preserves the author's exact wording, narrative mode preserves every idea but may rewrite freely. Use when the user says "mosaic", "assemble my fragments", "stitch these notes into a post", or provides a fragments file to turn into a finished piece. For writing from a topic with research, use article-factory; for prose from scratch, use the prose skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a researched long-form article from a topic prompt via an orchestrated pipeline - research agent (first-person sources, working-definition gate), narrative-architecture outline, writer/cold-reviewer loop with an explicit ACCEPT/REVISE verdict contract, then a catalog-deslop pass with a regression gate. The orchestrator dispatches subagents only; the writer never judges its own draft. Use when the user says "article factory", "write an article about X", "run the article pipeline", or asks for a researched long-form piece produced end-to-end. For essays and micro posts in the user's own voice without a research stage, use the prose skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes git diffs or staged changes and generates narrative commit messages that explain WHY a change was made, not just what changed — following Conventional Commits format. Use when asked to "write a commit message", "generate a commit", "describe my changes", "what should I commit this as", "commit this", "summarize my diff", or "help me commit". Works with git diff output, staged files, or plain descriptions of changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。