「options」の検索結果

Generate structured feature specifications through a collaborative product interview. Acts as a senior PM and business analyst pair — arrives with a point of view, challenges scope, proposes options at every decision. Composes the requirement-quality atom for spec quality enforcement and collaborative-judgment for surfacing genuine decisions. Produces an epic/feature hierarchy in .lattice/requirements/ that serves as direct input to design-blueprint. Use when the user says 'forge requirements', 'write requirements', 'spec this feature', 'create a feature spec', 'define this epic', 'write a PRD', 'spec out what we are building', or 'requirement forge'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts deep technical research for Aha Loop stories. Use before implementing stories involving unfamiliar libraries or architectural decisions. Triggers on: research this, investigate, explore options, compare alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides parallel exploration of multiple implementation approaches using git worktrees. Use when facing decisions with multiple valid paths. Triggers on: explore options, compare approaches, parallel exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make technology decisions for every product capability by discovering existing assets, evaluating vendor-aligned options, and categorizing as Reuse/Extend/Build/Buy/Integrate/Research during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Handles both greenfield and brownfield contexts. Triggers on "tech stack", "build or buy?", "what technologies?", "technical decisions", "what do we reuse?", "existing stack", "vendor constraint", "IBM-first", "what tools do we need?", "evaluate solutions", "select tech stack". Consumes FEA- (features), SCR- (screens), RISK- (constraints). Outputs TECH- entries with decisions, rationale, and cross-references. Feeds v0.6 Architecture Design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symfony UX Map for interactive maps with Leaflet or Google Maps in Symfony. Covers markers, polygons, polylines, circles, info windows, and LiveComponent integration. Use when displaying maps, placing markers, drawing shapes or routes, handling map events, building store locators, using custom tile layers, or making maps reactive with LiveComponent. Code triggers: <twig:ux:map />, Map(), Point(), Marker(), Polygon(), Polyline(), Circle(), InfoWindow(), MapOptionsInterface, ComponentWithMapTrait, fitBoundsToMarkers, ux:map:marker:before-create, ux:map:connect, SYMFONY_UX_MAP_DSN. Also trigger when the user asks "how to display a map", "how to add markers", "how to draw a polygon on a map", "how to handle map click events", "how to make a reactive map", "how to use Leaflet in Symfony", "how to use Google Maps in Symfony", "map not showing", "map has zero height". Do NOT trigger for SVG icons (use ux-icons) or general frontend interactivity (use stimulus).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs the public interface of a module before any implementation exists: writes the caller scenarios first, produces three candidates with genuinely different shapes, type-checks each one against the scenarios, scores them on measurable criteria and records the decision. Use when someone says "design the API for this module", "what should this signature look like", "compare interface options", "this function is awkward to call", "show me alternatives before I build it", or is about to add a module, library entry point, endpoint or command that other code will depend on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build CLI tools with Commander.js. Use when creating command-line applications, parsing arguments, implementing subcommands, or building developer tools with flags and options.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when pricing options, calculating Greeks, implementing exotic derivatives, or building pricing engines - covers Black-Scholes, binomial trees, Monte Carlo, and QuantLib integrationUse when ", " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in decision-making frameworks - systematic approaches to making better decisions under uncertainty. Covers decision criteria, reversibility assessment, stakeholder alignment, and decision documentation. Knows when to decide fast and when to deliberate. Use when "decision framework, how to decide, making a choice, tradeoff, should we, pros and cons, decision matrix, weighing options, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical decision-making frameworks - trade-off evaluation, reversibility analysis, and second-order thinking for better engineering choicesUse when "should we, which is better, trade-off, decision, choose between, versus, pros and cons, what if we, is it worth, evaluate options, decisions, trade-offs, architecture, adr, reversibility, strategy, planning, risk" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Don't die. Runway calculation, default alive vs. default dead, when to raise vs. cut, zero-based budgeting for startups. The math that keeps companies alive long enough to win. Burn rate is not just accounting - it's strategic leverage. Companies with runway have options. Companies without runway have desperation. Use when "burn rate, runway, default alive, default dead, how much money, when to raise, cutting costs, layoffs, cash management, should we hire, running out of money, bridge round, extend runway, ramen profitable, finance, runway, cash, burn, survival, fundraising, startup" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Alpha Vantage — Financial Market Data workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Access 20+ years of global financial data: equities, options, forex, crypto, commodities, economic indicators, and 50+ technical indicators and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain a configuration file and its key options. Use when a junior developer is confused by a config file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break out of a locked problem frame by picking one disciplined move — reframe, provocation (Po), random stimulus, SCAMPER, inversion, structured analogy, constraint play, or family traversal — and committing to it before evaluating. Use when stuck, when options feel narrow or obvious, when iterations produce variations of the same idea, or when the user says "widen this", "break out of", "think differently", "I'm stuck", "feels too obvious", "stress-test the framing", "what am I missing", or holds two related examples and asks what lies between or beyond them. Complements challenging (which evaluates) and convening-experts (which synthesizes viewpoints); this skill generates distance, not judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Composes single-file HTML artifacts (PR review writeups, status reports, incident postmortems, slide decks, design systems, prototypes, flowcharts, module maps, feature explainers, kanban boards, prompt tuners) from a small JSON spec instead of hand-written HTML/CSS/JS. Use when the user asks to "compare options side-by-side", requests an HTML version of a report or review or deck, asks for a flowchart, status update, postmortem, design system reference, interactive prototype, custom editor — or explicitly says "HTML artifact", "single HTML file", "self-contained HTML". Skip for ad-hoc HTML snippets (forms, emails, embedded widgets) where there's no template fit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate audio narration of blog posts using Google Gemini TTS. Supports summary narration, full article read-aloud, and two-speaker podcast/dialogue mode with 30 voice options. Outputs MP3 with HTML5 audio embed code. Works standalone via /blog audio or internally from blog-write. Falls back gracefully when API key is not configured. Use when user says "blog audio", "narrate blog", "audio version", "text to speech", "tts", "podcast mode", "read aloud", "audio narration", "voice", "narration", "generate audio".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for generating alternatives, and not for critiquing a spec, which is /pushback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for generating alternatives, and not for critiquing a spec, which is the pushback skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned signup conversion discipline. Use when auditing or redesigning account creation, registration, or trial-start flows, including field friction, progressive profiling, identity options, mobile behavior, abandonment, and measurement. NOT FOR: post-signup activation (use suede-onboarding), lead-capture forms (use suede-site-alchemy), or deploying auth and compliance changes without review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-affiliated marketing ideation using a structured tactic library scored for stage, audience fit, evidence, capacity, cost, and risk. Use when the user is stuck, wants options, or needs a shortlist of growth tactics before committing to a plan. NOT FOR: a comprehensive roadmap (use suede-marketing-plan), channel execution (use the relevant public Suede skill), or unattended recurring workflows (use suede-marketing-loops).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brainstorms and debates approaches, then drives toward an actionable decision. Use whenever someone needs a thinking partner for a decision they're facing: 'discuss', 'debate', 'brainstorm', 'weigh options', 'tradeoffs', 'should I do X or Y', 'help me decide', 'I'm torn between', 'sanity check my thinking', or 'what do you think about'. The user must be asking for help reasoning through a choice — not asking to build, fix, evaluate, plan, or modify something (even if the topic involves this skill itself). Picks the right decision lens, surfaces tradeoffs and blind spots, pushes back when reasoning is genuinely weak, and never implements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage Neo4j vector indexes, run vector similarity search (ANN/kNN), store embeddings on nodes or relationships, use SEARCH clause (Neo4j 2026.01+, preferred) or db.index.vector.queryNodes() procedure (deprecated 2026.04, still works on 2025.x), configure HNSW and quantization options, pick similarity function and embedding provider dimensions, and batch-update embeddings. Use when tasks involve CREATE VECTOR INDEX, vector.dimensions, cosine/euclidean search, embedding ingestion pipelines, semantic or structural nearest-neighbor lookup, or hybrid search (vector + fulltext, multiple vector sources, or graph-derived scores). Does NOT handle GraphRAG retrieval_query graph traversal — use neo4j-graphrag-skill. Does NOT handle fulltext-only/keyword-only search — use neo4j-cypher-skill. Does NOT compute GDS graph embeddings (FastRP, Node2Vec) — use neo4j-gds-skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Encrypt PDFs with AES-128, AES-256, or RC4 options and decrypt authorized PDFs with ComPDF. Use for PDF passwords, permission controls, encryption, decryption, and document-access protection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Closes a completed development branch by checking the final diff and proof, presenting merge, pull-request, keep, or discard options, and cleaning up only after the user or repository workflow chooses a path. Use when feature work is complete and the branch must be integrated or retired. Not for claiming a feature is complete before verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。