「readiness」の検索結果

Builds a founder-led B2B sales motion - ICP and kill criteria, outbound message, first-call and demo plan, pilot and procurement plan, pipeline math, and a readiness check for your first sales hire. Use when you ask about founder-led sales, enterprise sales, cold outreach, ICP, 'why are deals stalling', pilots/POCs, procurement, 'when do I hire a sales rep', or adding sales to a PLG product. Draws on 49 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Jen Abel, Geoffrey Moore and Pete Kazanjy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-implementation confidence assessment (≥90% required). Use before starting any implementation to verify readiness with duplicate check, architecture compliance, official docs verification, OSS references, and root cause identification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recognize which awakening stage consciousness is navigating through. Use when diagnosing seeker development, identifying stage transitions, or recognizing readiness levels. Covers 7 stages from initial dissatisfaction through natural flow mastery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-readiness pass — audits and implements the full non-happy-path matrix: loading skeletons, empty states, error messages, partial data, i18n, offline, permissions, and first-run guidance. Use when preparing a surface for production or when the user says "it crashes on empty data" / "there's no loading state" / "harden this". Invoke when the user asks for harden on their UI, or mentions 'harden' alongside design / UI / frontend work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. Use this skill when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS app code (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, or Expo) to identify potential App Store rejection issues before submission. Triggers on tasks involving app review preparation, compliance checking, or App Store submission readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review IEEE conference, journal, Transactions, Letters, or magazine manuscripts from a technical reviewer perspective using routed IEEE review gates. Use when evaluating scope fit, novelty, validity, data, clarity, compliance, advancement, engineering significance, method soundness, experiment sufficiency, baseline fairness, figure/table quality, formatting risks, rejection risk, major revision strategy, pre-submission readiness, or the quality and specificity of reviewer comments that may be generic, careless, contradictory, or possibly AI-generated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess organization's digital transformation readiness. Evaluate data culture, technology adoption, and process maturity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standardizes release approvals with GitHub-aware checklists and deployment gates. Use before releasing to production to verify all gates pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing where to submit a manuscript. Matches the abstract against curated journal profiles and returns ranked picks with scope fit, AI-disclosure policy, an acceptance-readiness pre-flight and a reject-fallback cascade. Impact and APC figures may be stale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coach workers, employees, and individual contributors to turn meetings, transcripts, minutes, and work notes into better execution: infer leader expectations, diagnose previous work, identify next actions, judge delivery readiness, and prepare a high-bandwidth update. Use after meetings, during work, before reviews, or across repeated low-value discussions. Perform semantic review from source evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize content for AI search and LLM citations across AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and similar systems. Use when improving AI visibility, answer engine optimization, or citation readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "process beta reader feedback", "alpha reader feedback", "feedback round", "synthesize reader feedback", "reader notes", "beta feedback", "reader readiness check", "review copy", "send the draft to readers", "share with readers who don't use GitHub", "triage the reader panel", or wants to collect, reconcile, and act on external reader feedback for a story project. NOT for running the simulated reader panel itself (use reader-panel), rounds with a professional editor (use editorial-review), or for checking a manuscript is ready to query or publish (use submission or publishing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "write a query letter", "query", "querying", "pitch", "blurb", "back cover copy", "jacket copy", "comp titles", "comparable titles", "synopsis for agents", "submit to agents", "submission tracker", "self-publishing description", "retailer description", "ready to query", "submission readiness check", "submit a short story", "magazine submission", "short-fiction markets", "simultaneous submission", "reprint rights", "order a short story collection", or wants to prepare and track a finished manuscript's submission to agents, publishers, magazines, anthologies, or retailers. NOT for pitching a series of several books (use series-continuity), or self-publishing production, metadata, or book rights deals (use publishing). The blurb, retailer description, and the rights a short-fiction market buys, such as reprint rights, stay here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

只读检查一个已生成的备考工作区是否健康并报告问题，默认不做任何修改。核对 .ingest 原材料版本、 内容单元、接管队列与派生产物完整性，以及 wiki、题库、视觉证据、计划和进度的一致性。当用户怀疑 工作区有问题、建库 readiness 被阻断、或想在开始复习前体检时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

从学生上传的课件/大纲/老师勾的重点/真题，一键初始化并验证备考工作区：解析 PDF、DOCX、PPTX、 XLSX、常见独立图片与 txt/md，建立分章节 LLM Wiki、标准题库、结构化接管队列与进度状态；仅在 Python 确实无法运行时 明确降级为手动写盘。当工作区尚未建立、资料发生变化、或建库 readiness 被阻断时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Records of Processing Activities against supervisory authority templates from CNIL, ICO, and BfDI. Provides completeness scoring, gap identification, and remediation tracking. Activate for RoPA audit, completeness check, supervisory authority readiness, CNIL template, ICO template, BfDI template, gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates executive reporting and visualization from RoPA data including processing activity counts, risk heatmaps, compliance scores, trend analysis, and supervisory authority readiness indicators. Activate for RoPA dashboard, executive reporting, risk heatmap, compliance score, trend analysis, board reporting, KPI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, testing, or preparing ANY contribution or pull request to the JSONbored/awesome-claude (HeyClaude) repo — adding a community content entry (agent/MCP server/skill/hook/command/rule/guide/collection/statusline), or making a platform/code change (website, registry package, MCP package, scripts). The repo has two separate review paths: a private, one-shot "HeyClaude submission gate" that decides single-file content PRs, and the shared gittensory-orb bot that posts an advisory readiness/linked-issue comment on platform/code PRs but does not itself merge or close content PRs. Unlike JSONbored/gittensory and JSONbored/metagraphed, a linked issue is OPTIONAL here — do not import their mandatory-linked-issue rule into this repo. Invoke for any "contribute to / open a PR against / submit an entry to / fix a bug in awesome-claude (HeyClaude)" task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or audit SLOs, SLIs, alert rules, incident response steps, escalation paths, postmortems, operational runbooks, and customer-impact communication. Use when defining production reliability, preparing launch readiness, responding to an outage, writing a runbook, tuning alerts, or closing the loop after an incident.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before an agent-produced diff is committed, pushed, opened as a PR, merged, landed, or applied to user files when explicit implementation approval is missing. Trigger for review gate, review pack, approve before landing, diff first then land, human approval, merge gate, commit gate, push gate, or PR readiness. Produces a concise review pack, records risks and verification, and blocks landing until a human explicitly approves or approves with required fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, diagnose, and verify performance budgets, latency targets, load tests, capacity estimates, bottleneck analysis, caching strategy, query efficiency, queue throughput, and regression gates. Use when a feature may be slow, a system must scale, a performance regression is suspected, or release readiness depends on throughput, cost, memory, CPU, or response time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review whether a repository's coding-agent harness can reliably carry work from intent through controlled execution, verification, delivery, and learning. Use when asked to assess agent readiness, repeated agent failures, Rules/Skills/Hooks/Memory effectiveness, missing validation or recovery loops, or whether a harness repair improved later outcomes. Do not use for code-only audits, AGENTS-only audits, individual skill reliability reviews, or executing the task itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and verify software releases with versioning, changelogs, release branches, feature flags, canaries, migration gates, rollback, deployment checks, and release readiness. Use when preparing a release, shipping a risky PR, coordinating app/backend/database rollout, recovering from a bad deploy, or defining release policy for a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guard long, ambiguous, or stateful AI-agent work from drift. Use when the user asks to run or continue a multi-step task, autonomous loop, bug fix, repo change, PR readiness check, compaction handoff, resume from previous context, cost-control checkpoint, or any task likely to span many tool calls, files, sessions, agents, or verification gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。