1,007 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use this skill whenever the user wants to do anything with Excel spreadsheet files (.xlsx, .xls, .csv). This includes reading data, writing formulas, manipulating cells, formatting, filtering, creating charts, pivot tables, and any spreadsheet automation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic copy editing through focused passes (the Seven Sweeps Framework) covering clarity, voice, proof, specificity, and friction removal. Use when editing marketing copy, reviewing drafts, polishing content, or proofreading.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Statute and regulation interpretation framework. Use when reading statutes, classifying requirements, analyzing operative keywords, applying canons of construction, or mapping compliance obligations from legislative text.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build ordered, annotated tours of an unfamiliar codebase and keep the anchors from rotting. Use when onboarding an engineer, handing off a service, or explaining a subsystem before a review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The canonical way to run agent-relay - self-bootstrap the local broker and autonomously spawn, monitor, and coordinate a team of worker agents without human intervention. Covers infrastructure startup, agent spawning, lifecycle monitoring, message-based reading via the relay MCP, and team coordination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes Claude for proofreading French texts, whether literary, technical, or professional. Grammar and spelling checks, detection of barbarisms, and stylistic suggestions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies UK case-law citations, pinpoint references and quotations against the official public register — The National Archives' Find Case Law — and statutory references against legislation.gov.uk, before a document that cites them is relied on, served or filed. Every check returns a graded verdict: VERIFIED, MISMATCH (the citation resolves to a different case — the classic AI miscitation), NOT ON REGISTER, OUTSIDE COVERAGE (the register cannot answer — absence proves nothing), or UNCHECKABLE (a law-report citation). The grading exists because there are two ways to get this wrong: citing a case that does not exist, and accusing a real case of not existing. Use when asked to check citations, verify a case exists, confirm a quotation is verbatim, check a pinpoint paragraph, audit a draft's authorities, screen a document for hallucinated cases, or check a statutory provision is in force. Not a substitute for reading the judgment: existence is not authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
First-pass framework for reading, interpreting, and structuring statutory analysis of US federal, state, and local law. Produces draft analysis for attorney review — not legal advice. Use this skill whenever the user references a specific US statute, regulation, ordinance, or rule by citation, asks "what does [statute X] require," asks for compliance scoping, applicability thresholds, requirement extraction, exemption analysis, definitional analysis, federal preemption analysis, or multi-state comparison — even if they don't explicitly ask for "statutory analysis." Halts and asks for missing inputs rather than guessing. Out of scope for non-US law.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, numerical, chronological, authority, commercial-logic, or confidentiality defects; test mediation usefulness, BATNAs, settlement corridors, information asymmetry, and opportunities for firmness, cooperation, imagination, and clarification; or produce an author-only validation report. Perform a qualified partial review when packets are missing. Diagnose by default; do not generate a new problem or edit source packets unless repairs are expressly requested. Requires access to all supplied files and a host capable of reading their formats; otherwise disclose the unreviewed material and resulting limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a legal document against legal design principles. Scores the document on six pillars: language patterns (bureaucratese, archaisms, passive voice, nominalization), readability (Flesch Reading Ease and language-specific equivalents), structure and navigation, hidden conditions (material obligations buried away from their headings), statutory duplication (restating the law instead of citing it), and visual hierarchy where layout is available. Assessment-only; does not rewrite the document. Works on English, French, and German documents, inferring the applicable jurisdiction from the document's language and textual signals: governing-law clause, statute citations, party addresses. Use when a user shares a legal document (contract, NDA, T&C, privacy policy, internal policy) asking how good the drafting is from a legal design perspective, whether it is readable, whether it contains buried clauses or restates the law, or how it scores on Flesch / LIX / Amstad / Kandel-Moles readability metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses a legal argument, submission, or piece of structured reasoning from the perspective of a judge reading it cold under time pressure. Produces a structured seven-part assessment: what the case appears to be about, immediate points of confusion, what feels strong, what feels weak, what is assumed but unproved, a provisional confidence level (low/medium/high), and what would be needed to persuade. The skill does not rewrite, improve, or attack the argument — it tells you how it actually lands on a sceptical, experienced reader with no prior context. Works on skeleton arguments, witness statements, letters before action, position statements, academic articles, and non-legal structured reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Searches the domestic courts of 122 jurisdictions — 153 databases, 49 automated — for extradition and arrest-warrant surrender decisions, each in its own language and vocabulary. Answers the question no commercial database does: how are OTHER executing states treating this requesting state, or this ground? Searching by requesting state localises its name per jurisdiction (AE becomes 'Emiratele Arabe Unite' in Romania, 'Emirati Arabi Uniti' in Italy), so the sweep finds what those courts actually wrote. Every hit passes a relevance gate; every search leaves a dated report, so the research is reconstructable months later. Use when asked what foreign courts have said about surrender to a given state, whether any European court has refused extradition on prison conditions, assurances or Article 3, for comparative extradition research, or to build a foreign-authority section of an extradition argument. Not for domestic case law of the user's own jurisdiction, and never a substitute for reading the judgment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Give feature/pricing cards a premium feel: a soft radial spotlight follows the cursor across the card and lifts its border. Keep the glow subtle and low-contrast. Falls back to a plain static border under prefers-reduced-motion and on touch. Do not use on text-dense reading surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When you want to draft, update, convert, or export a slide deck for a React/Next.js slide system (${SLIDE_DECK_REPO:-$HOME/code/your-slide-deck-site}/src/app/slides/). Writes TypeScript Slide[] arrays using your primitives (Eyebrow, Heading, Accent, Body, BulletList, Divider, TwoCol, GradientText), 12 cycling brand gradients, optional sections for "where am I" context, and speaker notes. Inspired by zarazhangrui/frontend-slides — "show, don't tell" for narrative (presents 3 angles, you pick) plus density modes (speaker-led vs reading-first). Four modes — new (draft from brief), update (modify existing, with overflow guards), ppt (convert legacy PPTX → React deck), export (Playwright snapshot existing React deck to standalone HTML, PDF, or Vercel URL — keeps brand). Triggers on "/slide-deck," "/slides new," "/slides export," "/slides update," "/slides ppt," "draft a deck," "deck for [topic]," "talk on [topic]," "keynote on [topic]," "internal deck for [audience]," "convert this pptx," "export this deck."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build students' capacity to interrogate a historical source before reading — asking who authored it, when, why, and what this means for reliability. Use when students read documents without attending to authorship.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design formative assessments that make students' historical thinking visible — revealing whether they source, close-read, contextualise, and corroborate. Use when assessing historical thinking skills or planning a diagnostic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Script a teacher think-aloud demonstrating expert reasoning processes for a specific task. Use when modelling problem-solving, writing, reading comprehension, or analytical processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adapt a historical primary source for classroom use — modifying complexity and length while preserving features for sourcing, close reading, and corroboration. Use when a primary source is too complex for the target age group.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a complete document-based history lesson using the Reading Like a Historian four-part structure. Use when planning a primary source inquiry lesson or converting a textbook lesson into document-based investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a fact-checking protocol for AI-generated text, extending SIFT with AI-specific adaptations for hallucination detection. Use when students need to verify AI claims and citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive spreadsheet creation, editing, and analysis with support for formulas, formatting, data analysis, and visualization. When Claude needs to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv, etc) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing data, (3) Modify existing spreadsheets while preserving formulas, (4) Data analysis and visualization in spreadsheets, or (5) Recalculating formulas
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running work off the main thread — WorkerThreadPool, Thread/Mutex/Semaphore, call_deferred, thread-safe scene access, and threaded resource loading
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or update documentation for the AI Hero API by reading the source code at ~/repos/ai/course-builder. Use when user wants to document, update docs for, or understand the AI Hero API endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to optimize configurable system parameters against a measurable scalar objective, especially for model training, inference, quantitative strategies, reinforcement learning, scientific workflows, or other expensive black-box evaluations where reading the project can improve trial selection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。