Generate structured PDF checklists and reports with tables, sections, and scoring criteria using Python libraries
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,619 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generate structured PDF checklists and reports with tables, sections, and scoring criteria using Python libraries
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit generated Excel reports by enumerating populated output rows, exposing formulas, and checking that each subtotal range includes all visible detail rows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a threat model for a target codebase. Three modes: "interview" walks an application owner through the four-question framework and produces a threat model from their answers; "bootstrap" derives a threat model from the code plus past vulnerabilities (CVEs, git history, pentest reports) when no owner is available; "bootstrap-then-interview" chains the two when both owner and codebase are present. All write THREAT_MODEL.md in a shared schema. Use when asked to "threat model", "build a threat model", "map the attack surface", or "what should we be worried about in this codebase".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "triage a vulnerability report", "assess a CVE", "evaluate a bug bounty submission", "decide if a finding is valid", "review a security finding", "dismiss a vulnerability", "should we fix this CVE", "prioritize a vulnerability report", or needs to determine whether an incoming vulnerability report warrants investigation. Applies 7 brocards (rules of thumb) to systematically accept, dismiss, or request more information on vulnerability reports, or needs to filter raw findings from agentic vulnerability discovery pipelines before human review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measures and interprets what a fuzzing campaign actually reaches, using llvm-cov, lcov, or a fuzzer's own coverage output. Covers baselining a new campaign, reading coverage reports, and turning uncovered regions into harness, seed, or dictionary work. Use when a fuzzer plateaus, when judging whether a harness is effective, after changing a harness, or when asking why some code is never reached.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and improves fuzzing harnesses for C/C++ and Rust. Covers mapping raw bytes onto a target API, generating structured inputs, avoiding non-determinism and false crashes, and deciding what to fuzz together. Use when writing a first LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput or fuzz_target! harness, when a campaign finds nothing or reports crashes that will not reproduce, or when the target API needs structured rather than raw input.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enrolls a project in OSS-Fuzz, Google's free continuous fuzzing service for open source, and drives it locally. Covers project.yaml, Dockerfile and build.sh setup, the helper scripts, reproducing OSS-Fuzz crash reports, and the acceptance criteria. Use when setting up continuous fuzzing for an open-source project, reproducing an OSS-Fuzz bug report, or testing an OSS-Fuzz build before submitting it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes smart contract codebases to identify state-changing entry points for security auditing. Detects externally callable functions that modify state, categorizes them by access level (public, admin, role-restricted, contract-only), and generates structured audit reports. Excludes view/pure/read-only functions. Use when auditing smart contracts (Solidity, Vyper, Solana/Rust, Move, TON, CosmWasm) or when asked to find entry points, audit flows, external functions, access control patterns, or privileged operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running first-pass QC on Public Equity Investing decks or reports. Do not use as external-circulation certification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building public-equity-investing initiating coverage reports. Do not use for trade pitches, memos, earnings notes, models, or tearsheets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing full pre-earnings preview reports with executive summary, expectation bar, guidance credibility, KPI dashboard, scenarios, and call questions. Do not use after results or for short summaries unless the user explicitly asks for a summary/short version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research across Notion and synthesize into structured documentation; use when gathering info from multiple Notion sources to produce briefs, comparisons, or reports with citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route Data Analytics plugin-level requests and broad analytics work to the right focused workflow. Use when Data Analytics is at-mentioned, or for analytics requests involving data, metrics, dashboards, reports, charts, notebooks, spreadsheets, KPIs, market sizing, or semantic layers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build polished analytical reports for executive, product, business, or technical audiences. Use when the task needs a durable answer-first narrative with evidence-backed findings, visuals or tables, caveats, and source context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage supplied or imported security findings against a repository using its security policy and static code evidence. Accepts scanner reports, advisories, GitHub findings, and Jira or Linear tickets. Do not use for discovery, duplicate triage, runtime validation, or fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route web data visualization work. Use when the user needs chart choice, visual critique, dashboards, maps or geospatial views, Gantt timelines, UML/software diagrams, scrollytelling, reports or exports, testing, accessibility, browser implementation, or concept-first visual design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Lighthouse audits locally via CLI or Node API, parse and interpret reports, and set performance budgets. Use when measuring site performance, understanding Lighthouse scores, setting up budgets, or integrating audits into CI. Triggers on: lighthouse, run lighthouse, lighthouse score, performance audit, performance budget. Do NOT use for fixing specific performance issues (use perf-web-optimization or core-web-vitals) or Astro-specific optimization (use perf-astro).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing GitHub PR checks that run in GitHub Actions. Uses `gh` to inspect checks and logs, summarize failure context, draft a fix plan, and implement only after explicit approval. Treats external providers (for example Buildkite) as out of scope and reports only the details URL. Do NOT use for addressing PR review comments (use gh-address-comments) or general CI outside GitHub Actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or edit articles and reports in the current iPolloWork Design session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate visually unified image-based PPT/PPTX decks from articles, reports, papers, notes, or outlines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and repair LoopX control-plane drift or agent behavior drift. Use when a LoopX task makes unexpectedly small progress, follows a stale or contradictory recommended_action, ignores a higher-priority blocked item while doing fallback work, reports vague owner/user gates, loses todo projection, misaligns benchmark treatment with the real product path, mixes temporary artifacts into commits, or when the user asks for root-cause analysis, self-repair, or why the harness/agent behaved unexpectedly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate a 4-agent cyber defense pipeline to analyze log files for threats. Use when investigating security logs, detecting anomalies in access patterns, classifying breach severity, or generating incident reports from nginx/auth/syslog files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
3-phase issue backlog management with audit, deep analysis, and validated triage actions. Use when triaging GitHub issues, sorting bug reports, cleaning up stale tickets, or detecting duplicate issues. Args: 'all' to analyze all, issue numbers to focus (e.g. '42 57'), 'en'/'fr' for language, no arg = audit only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。