1.5万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the implementation source code of MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers, clients, and tool handlers against a security baseline — authentication, sessions, rate limiting, input-schema validation, official-SDK usage, RCE vectors, and the OWASP MCP Top 10 — producing a report with file/line evidence. Use this skill when: - Reviewing an MCP server implementation for security before release - Checking a server against the baseline controls (MCP-01 to MCP-05) and the OWASP MCP Top 10 - Auditing tools for RCE vectors (command/code injection, unsafe deserialization, path traversal, SSTI, dependency hijacking, SSRF) - Verifying auth, session, rate-limiting, and input-validation controls on a network-exposed server - Reviewing MCP client code that handles untrusted server responses and session IDs - Requests like "review this MCP server for security" or "is my MCP server implementation secure?"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn vague "what did I do?" into evidence-backed impact statements for performance reviews, self-reviews, promotion packets, and weekly updates. Uniquely mines Copilot CLI session logs to reconstruct forgotten work, plus git commits and GitHub PRs. Enforces a 3-part impact contract (action → result → evidence). Works standalone with zero dependencies. Trigger for: "brag", "log work", "what did I do", "backfill my work history", "performance review", "self-review", "self assessment", "write impact statement", "review prep", "promo packet", "promotion case", "weekly update", "status report", "accomplishments", "what did I ship", "I forgot to log my work", "summarize my work", "track my wins", "what should I highlight", "end of half", "career growth", "work journal", or any request to document, summarize, or organize work accomplishments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare for client review meetings with portfolio performance summary, allocation analysis, talking points, and action items. Pulls together account data into a concise meeting-ready format. Use before quarterly reviews, annual checkups, or ad-hoc client meetings. Triggers on "client review", "meeting prep for [client]", "quarterly review", "prep for [client name]", or "client meeting".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality gate via second model. Spawn a different AI model to review work before committing. Includes refusal routing: if one model refuses, switch silently to the next. Extended in v0.25.1 with structured review-mode gating (when to invoke vs not) and a Codex code-review handoff for the diff-review case.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes sales pipeline health, revenue forecasting accuracy, and go-to-market efficiency metrics for SaaS revenue optimization. Use when analyzing sales pipeline coverage, forecasting revenue, evaluating go-to-market performance, reviewing sales metrics, assessing pipeline analysis, tracking forecast accuracy with MAPE, calculating GTM efficiency, or measuring sales efficiency and unit economics for SaaS teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a named diff or PR for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use when asked to review code or when a shipping skill needs a review receipt. Use when asked to apply this review's findings locally. Use ce-resolve-pr-feedback for feedback already left on a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review Apache ShardingSphere or user-authorized downstream pull requests and PR discussions from public or authorized repository evidence. Use for code-correctness or mergeability decisions, CI-focused review, root-cause and regression analysis, complete consolidated findings, copy-ready committer feedback, challenged findings, multi-round review, and formal review of local implementation candidates in the repository completion loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Daily PR review SLA sweep for {{target_repos}}. Flags PRs awaiting review past {{review_sla_hours}}h, stale PRs with no activity in {{stale_days}}d, and PRs sitting on unaddressed requested changes, then nudges the author or reviewer in {{alert_channel}} with what's blocking. Read-only against GitHub — never merges, closes, or approves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes for correctness, clarity, and potential issues. Use when the user asks for a review, code review, PR review, or wants feedback on a diff or file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a verdaccio diff, branch, or pull request against the repository review guide (security first, then npm-client compatibility, performance, product fit, maintainability), verify each finding against the code, and report actionable issues. Use for code reviews and for reviewing your own changes before or during a PR workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get a deep critical review of research from GPT using a secondary Codex agent. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full launch review against your framework and risk calibration. Use when the user says "review this launch", "legal review for [feature]", "can we ship this", "what are the legal issues with [product]", or references a launch tracker ticket or PRD that needs a category-by-category review memo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Termination review — high-risk flag detection, severance + release, and final pay timing by jurisdiction. Jurisdiction-specific rules and release consideration periods are researched per review, not stored. Use when the user says "reviewing a termination", "can we fire this person", "term review", or describes a termination scenario.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gets independent code reviews from Codex or Antigravity for uncommitted changes, branch diffs, and commits. Use when the user requests an external review, a second opinion on code, a codex review, a gemini review, an antigravity review, or /second-opinion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to reduce churn, build expansion revenue, automate customer success, or optimize net revenue retention. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'retention,' 'expansion revenue,' 'upsell,' 'NRR,' 'net revenue retention,' 'customer success,' 'land and expand,' 'closed-lost,' or 'renewal.' This skill covers expansion and retention systems from usage triggers through automated customer success. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trustpilot company profile lookup on trustpilot.com — input a company domain (e.g. apple.com, shopify.com, shopwagandtail.com) and extract company metadata: official display name, businessUnitId, TrustScore (1-5), star rating, total review count, last-12-months review count, primary category and all categories, verification flags (verifiedByGoogle, verifiedPaymentMethod, verifiedUserIdentity), claimed/closed status, website URL, contact info (email, phone, country, city, address, zip), profile image, and optional reply behavior metrics (averageDaysToReply, replyPercentage, negativeReviewsWithRepliesCount, companyUsesAIResponses). Detects company-not-found and returns isCompanyFound=false with the searched domain. Use when user mentions Trustpilot company info, Trustpilot TrustScore, look up Trustpilot rating, check Trustpilot stars, Trustpilot business profile, Trustpilot review count, Trustpilot company lookup, Trustpilot verification status, Trustpilot reply percentage, Trustpilot AI responses, business unit ID Trustpilot, get company rating from Trustpilot, scrape Trustpilot company, batch enrich domains with Trustpilot, bulk company info Trustpilot, fast domain enrichment with TrustScore, Trustpilot company metadata, Trustpilot brand monitoring, competitor TrustScore comparison, trustpilot.com domain enrichment, trustpilot company profile, trustpilot domain check, trustpilot business listing, check if company is on Trustpilot, Trustpilot category lookup, company contact info from Trustpilot. Also applies to lead-list enrichment with reputation scores, supplier vetting, agency or KOL vetting via review reputation, aggregator sites that need TrustScores for many domains, due-diligence workflows, and pre-outreach reputation checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to review a diff or pull request, write review comments, audit code quality, establish review standards, or improve how a team performs code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production-ready CSS transitions for web apps. Use when implementing notification badges, dropdowns, modals, panel reveals, page transitions, card resizes, number pop-ins, text swaps, icon swaps, success checks, avatar group hovers, error state shakes, search/input clear, skeleton loaders, shimmer text, sliding tabs, tooltips, staggered text reveals, card hover tilt, plus-to-menu morph, accordions, toasts, like buttons, learn-more hovers, checkbox checks, spinning counters, toggles, AI thinking states, reasoning streams, streaming text, matrix dot loaders, or banner stacking. Triggers on "add a transition", "animate the dropdown", "make the modal open smoothly", "swap icon", "page slide", "stagger animation", "open / close transition", "make it animate", "fade between", "success animation", "form error", "shake on invalid", "hover lift", "avatar stack hover", "clear the search", "skeleton loader", "loading shimmer", "shimmer text", "sliding tabs", "segmented control", "tooltip", "reveal text", "tilt card", "3D hover tilt", "cursor glare", "plus to menu", "FAB morph", "accordion", "collapsible", "expand / collapse", "disclosure", "toast", "snackbar", "like button", "heart animation", "learn more arrow", "checkbox", "check animation", "spinning counter", "odometer", "slot machine digits", "toggle", "switch", "thinking states", "AI status line", "agent reasoning", "reasoning stream", "streaming text", "stream words in", "matrix loader", "dot loader", "banner stack", "stacked toasts". Also "motion tokens", "scan for ad-hoc transitions", "replace hardcoded durations with motion tokens", "tokenize my animations", and the commands transitions reveal, transitions review, transitions apply, transitions refine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compute the EXACT sub-transaction impact of a rollup rule in TRES Finance — every filter applied — and flag genuine problems (zero matches, overlap, config mistakes) before the rule is created. Two modes. Mode A: a pre-create quality gate invoked by the tres-rollup-rules skill to vet proposed candidate rules. Mode B: standalone review of a rule someone submitted or of existing PENDING rules. Trigger this skill when the user says "review this rollup rule", "what would this rollup rule actually match", "preview the rollup impact", "how many transactions would this rule catch", "is this rollup rule valid", "validate my rollup rule", "check my pending rollup rules", or "review the rollup requests". Do NOT use this to design or propose new rollups — that is tres-rollup-rules. This skill only measures impact and flags issues; it never executes mutations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。