Recover from stale RFDB nodes that survive `commit_batch` cleanup despite having their `file` field listed in `changed_files`. Use when: (1) re-running an enricher/orchestrator step but old data with the same file field stays in the graph, (2) `commit_batch(changed_files=[X], ...)` reports success but a query later still returns nodes with `file = X`, (3) you re-pointed structural nodes (e.g., DIRECTORY/FILE) from a synthetic file path to real file paths and the old synthetic-path nodes won't go away, (4) graph-stream / find_by_type returns a mix of "stale" and "new" nodes for the same logical entity. Root cause: `handle_commit_batch` calls `engine.find_by_attr({file: X})` to enumerate nodes-to-delete, but that query path returns only a PARTIAL set after compaction (L1 segments and the file→nodes index can desync). Workaround: enumerate stale nodes via the TS rfdb client `queryNodes({file: X})` (different code path that finds all of them) and call `deleteNode(id)` per node, then re-commit the intended state. Related: rfdb-manifest-l1-carryforward (same L1 family).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disentinel/grafema☆ 362026年8月24日 更新
Fix intermittent `{:no_translation, :unicode, :latin1}` crashes in Elixir escript daemons that use length-prefixed framed IPC on stdin/stdout. Use when: (1) daemon worker crashes only on some input files, usually ones with non-ASCII bytes (kanji, cyrillic, emoji); (2) error surfaces as `Protocol error` from daemon's error branch or as garbled frame-length bytes seen by the orchestrator/client side; (3) standalone one-shot mode works fine on the same input but multi-request daemon mode fails; (4) `IO.binread(:stdio, N)` returns `{:error, {:no_translation, :unicode, :latin1}}` despite the "bin" prefix suggesting it should be encoding-agnostic. Root cause is the escript default `:standard_io` encoding — it's `:unicode`, and `IO.binread` still routes through the io_server, which translates bytes to codepoints and errors when raw binary frames contain invalid UTF-8 sequences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disentinel/grafema☆ 362026年8月24日 更新
Fix nodes silently disappearing from RFDB when an enricher or post-resolution pass writes new nodes via BatchHandle. Use when: (1) writing a TypeScript enricher that should ADD nodes/edges to existing files, (2) after calling `client.createBatch()` + `batch.addNode({file: 'X', ...})` + `batch.commit()` the original nodes in file X have vanished, (3) tests that load a graph fixture, run an enricher, then query original nodes get empty results, (4) a verification step shows expected nodes pre-enrichment but 0 post-enrichment. Root cause: `BatchHandle.commit()` invokes RFDB's `commit_batch` which AUTO-POPULATES `changed_files` from each added node's `file` field, then the server DELETES all existing nodes whose `file` matches before inserting new ones — file-level upsert semantics. This is correct for the JS/Haskell analyzers (which fully re-emit a file's contents) but catastrophic for enrichers that only ADD to existing files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disentinel/grafema☆ 362026年8月24日 更新
Fix RFDB V2 graph data silently not persisting to disk after analysis. Use when: (1) rfdb-server reports "0 nodes, 0 edges" on restart despite successful analysis, (2) segment directories exist but are empty (no .bin files), (3) manifest_index.json shows total_nodes: 0 despite analysis logging 70k+ nodes, (4) Docker builds produce empty graph databases, (5) --clear flag used before analyze command. Root cause: GraphEngineV2::clear() replaces the store with MultiShardStore::ephemeral() which has path: None, causing all flush operations to write to in-memory buffers only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disentinel/grafema☆ 362026年8月24日 更新
Fix missing theorem proof terms when analyzing Lean 4 environments via importModules. Use when: (1) ConstantInfo.value? returns none for theorems despite TheoremVal.value being Expr, (2) building code graph / dependency extractor for Lean 4 and getting 0 proof dependency edges, (3) Lean 4.30+ project where theorem proofs appear missing from loaded environment, (4) analyzing Mathlib or any Lean 4 project and proof terms are empty. Root cause: breaking change in Lean 4.30 — value? treats theorems as opaque by default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disentinel/grafema☆ 362026年8月24日 更新
Fix silent incorrect results in RFDB Datalog queries that share a variable between two edge atoms on opposite ends (e.g. self-join patterns like `edge(M, C, "T1"), edge(C, M, "T2")`). Use when: (1) a Datalog rule returns rows that look structurally wrong (e.g. a self-loop rule reports hits but pinning M to each reported id refutes the edge existence), (2) Cypher `MATCH (m)-[:R1]->(c)-[:R2]->(m)` returns the same bogus rows (engine-level bug, not Datalog-specific), (3) results change when you bind one variable explicitly vs. leave it free. Root cause: hash- join fast path in `eval_edge_hash_join` / `eval_incoming_hash_join` unconditionally rebinds the non-key Term::Var without checking whether the variable is already bound in the current row.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disentinel/grafema☆ 362026年8月24日 更新
Diagnose and fix RFDB data disappearing after compaction, where rfdb-server reports a tiny node count (e.g. "15 nodes") on startup despite manifest_index.json showing hundreds of thousands of nodes and segment files existing on disk. Use when: (1) rfdb-server logs "Default database: N nodes" with N orders of magnitude smaller than recent analysis output, (2) /api/stats returns only the most recent commit's nodes, (3) the issue appears AFTER a compaction event (manifest with l1_node_segments populated and node_segments: []), (4) subsequent commits dropped L1 references. Root cause: ManifestStore::create_manifest() initializes l1_node_segments/l1_edge_segments to Vec::new() instead of cloning from current manifest, so any commit AFTER compaction silently orphans all L1 data even though segment .seg files still exist on disk. Compaction injects L1 fields explicitly after create_manifest, but regular commits do not.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disentinel/grafema☆ 362026年8月24日 更新
RFDB server becomes unresponsive (60s+ timeouts) during enricher addEdges write storms. Use when: (1) RFDB CPU spikes to 60-90% after addEdges calls; (2) subsequent reads time out at 60s; (3) server stays catatonic for 5-15 min after a write storm; (4) Tokio main thread parked (write-lock contention). Root cause: add_edges() calls maybe_auto_flush() which has a memory-pressure path that fires on NODE count — not edge count — and holds the exclusive write lock during disk I/O. Fix: separate maybe_auto_flush_edges() uses byte-limit only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disentinel/grafema☆ 362026年8月24日 更新
Find the root cause of a bug before writing any fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
infinition/LaRuche☆ 332026年9月22日 更新
Debug pipeline: investigates a bug, diagnoses root cause, writes failing tests, implements fix via TDD, and reviews the result. Orchestrates bug-investigator -> bug-fixer -> code-reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nickmaglowsch/claude-setup☆ 312026年8月21日 更新
Analyzes Perfetto traces to find the root cause of latency, memory, or jank issues in Android apps. Use when the user provides a Perfetto trace file and asks any question, ongoing investigation, or open-ended request to analyze its contents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
kabirnayeem99/Ktor2Curl☆ 302026年8月31日 更新
Systematically trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp☆ 272026年9月13日 更新
Use when asked to debug, fix a bug, investigate an error, or do root cause analysis, and when users report errors, stack traces, unexpected behavior, or say something stopped working.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill☆ 262026年7月20日 更新
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. (gstack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill☆ 262026年7月20日 更新
Use when diagnosing or fixing user-reported application bugs. Guides evidence-backed root-cause analysis from symptoms, screenshots, logs, provider failures, background tasks, storage, or desktop lifecycle behavior through a scoped patch and regression tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sidiangongyuan/codex-skills-library☆ 252026年9月21日 更新
Format recurring KPI snapshots, exception flags, and owner follow-ups for weekly operations reviews. Use when the work is routine packaging of operational metrics and exceptions. Do not use for root cause analysis, process redesign, or full performance diagnosis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
hoavdc/CodexKit☆ 252026年10月11日 更新
Convert scattered progress notes, RAID changes, and milestone movement into a clean weekly or biweekly status update. Use when the work is routine status packaging or steering prep. Do not use for project governance design, root cause analysis, or deep portfolio risk assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
hoavdc/CodexKit☆ 252026年10月11日 更新
Write blameless incident postmortems following Google SRE methodology. Covers timeline reconstruction, root cause analysis (5 Whys), impact assessment, and action items with owners. Use after production incidents, outages, or significant bugs to prevent recurrence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
hoavdc/CodexKit☆ 252026年10月11日 更新
Define a Lean Six Sigma improvement project using DMAIC, problem framing, baseline measures, root-cause hypotheses, CTQs, and control planning. Use when an existing process is underperforming and the team needs a charter, SIPOC, baseline, and improvement path. Do not use for brand-new process design or vague complaints with no process boundary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
hoavdc/CodexKit☆ 252026年10月11日 更新
Divergent ideation across model families — the same brainstorm, but each cognitive frame is handed to a different model (Claude sub-agent, OpenAI Codex, a cheap third via OpenCode) so the ideas diverge by frame and by model priors at once. Use for open design questions, architecture and API shape, naming, schema choices, fuzzy bugs with no known root cause, or on "multi adhd", "brainstorm with everyone", "wide ideas from all models". Skip for lookups, syntax, and anything phrased as "quick", "standard" or "canonical".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
szarkans/multi☆ 232026年10月9日 更新
This skill provides expert-level guidance for debugging and fixing bugs in VS Code extensions. Use when investigating runtime errors, fixing memory leaks, resolving WebView issues, debugging activation problems, fixing TypeScript type errors, or troubleshooting extension communication failures. Covers systematic debugging workflows, common bug patterns, root cause analysis, and prevention strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal☆ 222026年10月13日 更新
The investigation harness for "why is this slow?" over a Pulp Perfetto trace (.pftrace). Runs the hypothesis→query→drill-down chain-of-evidence loop autonomously and returns a plain-English root cause + evidence + a concrete fix. TRIGGER on "why is my plugin slow to open", "find the slowest frames", "why is the UI stuttering", "why is my plugin using so much CPU", "which DSP node is expensive", "the load meter looks calm but CPU is pinned", or a named `pulp trace gpu-startup|gpu-health|gpu-probe` analysis. Ships Pulp-specific hints for dsp, frame, js, gpu, and cross-platform symptoms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generous-Corp/pulp☆ 222026年10月14日 更新
Raise real concurrency in asyncio LLM batch scorers built on the OpenAI SDK (AsyncOpenAI, including OpenAI-compatible providers like DeepSeek). Use when: (1) raising an asyncio.Semaphore above ~100 produces no throughput gain, (2) a batch pipeline saturates near 100 in-flight requests despite a larger semaphore, (3) planning a high-concurrency campaign against a provider with no hard rate limit (DeepSeek v4-flash tolerates 2000+ in flight). Root cause: AsyncOpenAI's default httpx pool caps max_connections at 100, silently bottlenecking any larger semaphore — you must pass a custom http_client with httpx.Limits sized to the semaphore.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills☆ 222026年9月5日 更新
Diagnose and fix slow pyfixest regression GRIDS (many feols/fepois calls run sequentially) that stay slow despite demeaner_backend="cupy64" and an idle GPU. Use when: (1) a script looping dozens of pf.feols models on a 100k+ row panel takes ~1 min/model, (2) process inspection shows ~1-1.5 cores busy and nvidia-smi shows ~0% GPU utilization with a resident cupy context, (3) planning any worker prompt that will run a model grid (robustness variants x FE structures x domains). Root cause: per-model CPU-side single-threaded fixed costs (formulaic model-matrix build, interaction construction, singleton detection, cluster vcov) dominate wall time; GPU demeaning is a small slice. Fix: shard the model grid across OS processes and/or use pyfixest multiple-estimation syntax; mandate this IN THE WORKER PROMPT.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills☆ 222026年9月5日 更新