「safety」の検索結果

Constitutional AI and safety guardrail prompts for aligned LLM behavior

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master TypeScript with advanced types, generics, and strict type safety. Handles complex type systems, decorators, and enterprise-grade patterns. Use PROACTIVELY for TypeScript architecture, type inference optimization, or advanced typing patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master TypeScript's advanced type system including generics, conditional types, mapped types, template literals, and utility types for building type-safe applications. Use when implementing complex type logic, creating reusable type utilities, or ensuring compile-time type safety in TypeScript projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement memory-safe programming with RAII, ownership, smart pointers, and resource management across Rust, C++, and C. Use when writing safe systems code, managing resources, or preventing memory bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write idiomatic C++ code with modern features, RAII, smart pointers, and STL algorithms. Handles templates, move semantics, and performance optimization. Use PROACTIVELY for C++ refactoring, memory safety, or complex C++ patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master defensive Bash programming techniques for production-grade scripts. Use when writing robust shell scripts, CI/CD pipelines, or system utilities requiring fault tolerance and safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose Swift Concurrency issues, refactor callback-based code to async/await, and guide Swift 6 migration when working with tasks, actors, @MainActor, Sendable, data races, thread safety, or concurrency-related compiler and linter warnings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When provisioning, setting a limit, or committing an estimate under uncertainty, size a buffer to residual error and the cost of breach—not to the optimistic edge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate one or more standalone Meta image-ad creatives via ChatGPT Image 2 (gpt-image-2) through the Arcads external API. Locks the model, auto-strips platform chrome, enforces edge-safe layouts and glyph-safety inside body text. Use when the user asks for a "gpt-image-2 ad", "ChatGPT Image ad", "Image 2 ad creative", "make a static image ad with GPT", or anchors on a need for typography-heavy / dense-text / UI-mimicry ad creatives (chat threads, comparison tables, fake search results, iOS dialogs, Slack snapshots, ChatGPT-conversation ads, Apple Notes lists). Does NOT trigger on Nano Banana cues — use nano-banana-image-ad for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before claiming that the package can be installed or published. Verifies structure, adapters, schemas, executable scripts, and public-safety boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Azure API Management as an AI Gateway for AI models, MCP tools, and agents. WHEN: semantic caching, token limit, content safety, load balancing, AI model governance, MCP rate limiting, jailbreak detection, add Azure OpenAI backend, add AI Foundry model, test AI gateway, LLM policies, configure AI backend, token metrics, AI cost control, convert API to MCP, import OpenAPI to gateway.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score whether a news event is worth newsjacking, or whether a user's pitch idea is actually newsworthy to journalists. Uses calibrated anchors, hard anti-inflation rules, standing checks, timing windows, and brand-safety kill switches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor current news and reaction signals, then decide which are credible newsjacking opportunities for a client. Uses the local monitoring engine for evidence, but the skill owns PR judgment, brand safety, standing, decay, angle fit, and handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ultra-compressed response style that reduces output token count while preserving technical accuracy, with intensity levels and auto-clarity safety rules

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans and removes sensitive data (secrets, API keys, private domains/IPs, PII) from GitHub repository history, then verifies and force-pushes safely. Use for 清理敏感数据 / 历史重写 / 泄露, "scan sensitive data", "clean git history", "remove secrets from repo", or before any force push to a public repo. Not for local-only Git recovery (use git-safety-net) or ordinary repository setup (use auto-repo-setup).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits, preserves and recovers local Git state before cleanup: unpushed or wrong-branch commits, dirty worktrees, duplicate clones, stashes, dangling commits, squash-merge uncertainty. Use when the user fears lost work, wants to recover a commit, asks if a branch is actually merged, asks whether a branch, worktree or clone is safe to delete, or wants one clean main (误删分支 / 还有没有丢的东西). Not for GitHub PR operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and repairs repository setup and guarded Git workflows for Claude Code or Codex — environment repair, startup sync, hook auditing, collaborator handoff. Use when a repo won't run, a teammate onboards, hook output duplicates, or commit/push/conflict needs guarding. Not for lost-commit recovery (use git-safety-net), GitHub ops (use github-ops), or history scrubbing (use github-sensitive-data-cleanup).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operates GitHub via gh CLI and REST/GraphQL — PRs, issues, Actions, repos, collaborators, org permissions, 2FA — with explicit target, authorization, and independent readback. Use when a write reports success but state didn't change, or choosing gh/REST/GraphQL/UI-only. Not for local Git recovery (use git-safety-net), maintainer PR review (use github-review-pr), or upstream contribution (use github-contributor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a 6-dimension evidence-based health audit of this skills marketplace repo — code safety, docs/SSOT, security/PII, PR/issue triage, manifest integrity — via a parallel workflow, then verifies findings by priority. Use for 全面体检 / 检查仓库状态 / 审计一下仓库, a pre-release sweep, or "is this repo OK" even without saying "workflow". Not for building marketplace.json (use marketplace-dev) or cache drift (use skill-governance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 写作业指导书, SOP 作业指导书, 工序作业标准, 标准作业书, 新员工看得懂的操作说明, WI 怎么写, or write a shop-floor work instruction for a production or inspection step in a Chinese factory. Produces a one-station 作业指导书 in Chinese with the header block (文件编号, 版本, 工序, 产品, 标准工时), materials and tools, numbered steps with key points (要点) and the reasons, quality checks and limits, safety notes and PPE, photo or diagram placeholders, abnormal-situation handling, and a revision record, written for a new operator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a clinical trial protocol synopsis with the elements regulators and IRBs expect. Use when asked to write a clinical trial protocol, a study protocol synopsis, a trial design, or to structure endpoints/eligibility/statistics for an interventional study. Produces a structured protocol synopsis — objectives, design, population with eligibility, interventions, endpoints, statistics, and safety/ethics — for expert review. (For non-clinical/UX research, use research-protocol.)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan an apprentice's or new laborer's first week so they're useful by Friday and safe from hour one — day-by-day teaching order, the safety non-negotiables stated before anything else, what they're allowed to touch unsupervised, and the check-out conversation that decides week two. Use when a tradesperson says 'my apprentice starts Monday', 'how do I train the new guy', or 'the apprentice is useless and I don't have time to teach'. Produces a first-week plan, a can/can't-touch list, and the Friday review script.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an LLM agent design and find where it will be unreliable, expensive, or unsafe. Use when asked to review an agent architecture, critique a multi-step/tool-using agent, debug an agent that loops or goes off-task, or harden an agent before launch. Produces a structured review — task fit, control flow, tools, memory/context, failure handling, cost, and safety — with prioritised findings and fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。