1,513 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Your capability catalog — read this at boot. Lists the temporal date-range skills and the external integrations (reached via the loopback broker) available to you as a spawned worker, and exactly how to call each. Read-only. Consult it whenever you're unsure what tools/integrations you have or how to invoke them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve "thisYear" to a concrete ISO date range relative to your run time — this year so far (Jan 1 → today). Returns inclusive civil dates plus exact UTC instants so you have temporal context without computing dates by hand. Read-only: no writes, no network. Use before a year-to-date task (YTD metrics, "so far this year").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve ANY named time window — today, yesterday, thisWeek, lastWeek, last7Days, last30Days, last90Days, thisMonth, lastMonth, thisQuarter, lastQuarter, thisYear, lastYear, last12Months — or an arbitrary range (lastNdays / lastNweeks / lastNmonths) to a concrete ISO date range relative to your run time. Read-only: no writes, no network. Use whenever a task is time-scoped and you need exact start/end dates without computing them by hand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve "thisWeek" to a concrete ISO date range relative to your run time — this week so far (Monday → today). Returns inclusive civil dates plus exact UTC instants so you have temporal context without computing dates by hand. Read-only: no writes, no network. Use before a week-to-date task (this week's activity, weekly standups).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing, then produces a scorecard with evidence-based ratings and a priority-ordered roadmap. Use when assessing or scoring the maturity of a smart contract or blockchain codebase, producing a maturity scorecard or evaluation, or judging how mature, well-tested, or well-documented such a project is against a rubric.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interprets Culture Index (CI) surveys, behavioral profiles, and personality assessment data. Supports individual profile interpretation, team composition analysis (gas/brake/glue), burnout detection, profile comparison, hiring profiles, manager coaching, interview transcript analysis for trait prediction, candidate debrief, onboarding planning, and conflict mediation. Accepts extracted JSON or PDF input via OpenCV extraction script. Use when the user shares a Culture Index PDF or JSON profile, asks what someone's CI traits mean, compares Culture Index profiles across a team or against a hiring profile, or asks about burnout risk from Survey-versus-Job gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons / Mana evil twin attacks, captive-portal phishing, KRACK and FragAttacks, WPS Pixie Dust, deauthentication and disassociation attacks, rogue AP construction (hostapd-mana), 802.1X bypass, MAC randomization defeat, BLE/Zigbee/IEEE 802.15.4 sidebands, and Wi-Fi 6/6E/7 considerations. Use when scoping wireless pentest, war-driving an estate, or testing corporate wireless segmentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
IoT and embedded device security testing methodology. Covers hardware reconnaissance (UART, JTAG, SWD, SPI flash, I2C EEPROM, eMMC chip-off), firmware acquisition (vendor portals, OTA capture, flash dump, binwalk extraction), firmware analysis (filesystem mounting, binary triage, hardcoded secrets, default credential discovery), bootloader attacks (U-Boot console, secure-boot bypass, fault injection), runtime attacks on embedded Linux/RTOS (busybox CVEs, MTD writes, /dev/mem), wireless protocol attacks (Zigbee, BLE, Z-Wave, LoRaWAN, Thread/Matter, sub-GHz), MQTT/CoAP/Modbus/BACnet/OPC-UA exploitation, mobile companion app analysis, cloud-IoT API abuse, and side-channel/glitching basics. Use for IoT pentest, smart-home assessment, ICS/OT testing, or embedded vulnerability research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dense description covering ARP spoofing, LLMNR/NBT-NS/mDNS poisoning, DNS poisoning, MITM attacks, VLAN hopping, DHCP attacks, 802.1X/NAC bypass, IPv6 attacks. Tools: Bettercap, Responder, mitm6, Ettercap, Wireshark. MITRE T1557, T1040. Use when conducting internal network assessments or testing Layer 2/3 attack surface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SQL injection testing skill for offensive security assessments and bug bounty hunting. Covers error-based, UNION-based, boolean/time-based blind, out-of-band, second-order, NoSQL, GraphQL, WebSocket, and JSON-operator SQLi. Includes WAF bypass techniques, database-specific exploitation (MySQL, MSSQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle), cloud-native attack paths, ORM CVE tracking, and SQLmap automation. Use when performing web application SQL injection testing, database enumeration, privilege escalation via SQLi, or assessing injection vectors in APIs and modern stacks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a go/no-go assessment for retiring a product or feature, then right-size the effort. Use when someone says "we should probably kill this" and nobody has made the call.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build dark-mode glassmorphism interfaces with readable contrast, frosted surfaces, and gradient borders using a pseudo-element mask. Use when asked for glass cards, frosted dark hero sections, blur panels, or dark UI systems with gradient/glow borders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive security audit with scored posture assessment
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rapid security assessment focused on OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill helps users automatically extract Amazon product reviews via the Amazon Reviews API. Agent should proactively apply this skill when users express needs like getting reviews for Amazon product with ASIN B07TS6R1SF, analyzing customer feedback for a specific Amazon item, getting ratings and comments for a competitive product, tracking sentiment of recent Amazon reviews, extracting verified purchase reviews for quality assessment, summarizing user experiences from Amazon product pages, monitoring product performance through customer reviews, collecting reviewer profiles and links for market research, gathering review titles and descriptions for content analysis, scraping Amazon reviews without requiring a login.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
执行全面的异常值检测与数据质量评估，利用 IQR 方法识别异常值并结合偏度、峰度分析数据分布特征，适用于非正态分布数据的预处理阶段。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits existing tests in any language using formal, research-backed test smell names and the testsmells.org 19-smell academic taxonomy. Use when the caller asks for an academic or citable test-smell review, named smell categories, or a formal severity-ranked smell assessment. Covers Assertion Roulette, Conditional Test Logic, Mystery Guest, Eager Test, Sleepy Test, Unknown Test, Sensitive Equality, and the rest of the catalog across .NET, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, and C++. DO NOT USE FOR a quick pragmatic test review (use test-anti-patterns), writing or running tests, framework migration, coverage, or assertion-diversity metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Meme coin and token security audit — rug pull detection (honeypot, hidden mint, fee manipulation, LP lock bypass), Solana SPL token analysis (freeze authority, mint authority, metadata mutability), Token-2022 extension risks (transfer hooks, permanent delegate), DEX liquidity pool attacks (sandwich amplification, LP drain, bonding curve exploits), pump.fun/Raydium/Jupiter integration risks, token_scanner.py automation, and real exploit examples from 2024-2025. Use for any token audit, rug pull assessment, meme coin security review, or pre-investment due diligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend practical study strategies matched to the material, learning goal, assessment, time, and learner constraints. Use for revision planning, homework routines, independent study, replacing ineffective habits, or adapting recall, spacing, explanation, and practice activities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive OSINT methodology for external red-team operations and authorized attack-surface assessments. Covers the 5-stage recon pipeline (seed discovery, asset expansion, enrichment, exposure analysis, reporting), asset-graph discipline with 29 asset types, severity rubric (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/INFO), confidence upgrade workflows, time budgeting, asset-level triage rules, scale-based tactics, identity-fabric mapping (Entra/Okta/ADFS/Google/SAML/M365 Teams+SharePoint+OAuth), API and auth-map methodology, JavaScript deep analysis, mobile attack surface, cloud attack surface, breach×identity correlation, detectability tagging, detection-aware probing (back-off, persona rotation), read-only validator discipline, WAF/CDN bypass + origin discovery, vulnerability prioritization (CVE/EPSS/KEV), phishing infrastructure planning + pretext development, bug bounty submission templates, client deliverable templates with risk translation, threat-actor investigation (incl. RU/CN pivots), cryptocurrency tracing, image/video forensics, chronolocation. Use when planning or executing reconnaissance against authorized targets, mapping an organization's external attack surface, investigating a person/entity, tracing crypto flows, geolocating media, or performing attribution work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Meme coin and token security audit — rug pull detection (honeypot, hidden mint, fee manipulation, LP lock bypass), Solana SPL token analysis (freeze authority, mint authority, metadata mutability), Token-2022 extension risks (transfer hooks, permanent delegate), DEX liquidity pool attacks (sandwich amplification, LP drain, bonding curve exploits), pump.fun/Raydium/Jupiter integration risks, and real exploit examples from 2024-2025. Use for any token audit, rug pull assessment, meme coin security review, or pre-investment due diligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "pentest WordPress sites", "scan WordPress for vulnerabilities", "enumerate WordPress users, themes, or plugins", "exploit WordPress vulnerabilities", or "use WPScan". It provides comprehensive WordPress security assessment methodologies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。