1,528 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write user-facing comments, plans, and documents in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English — short, unambiguous sentences with approved words and one meaning each — so readers understand them the first time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
For product and technical management work: turn PRDs, roadmaps, RFCs, architecture reviews, and retros into decision documents. Built around the core query "pm-feature-business-case-deck", with product strategy lead judgment, buyer-ready proof, and this outcome: approve the feature, architecture, roadmap, or incident follow-up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
What the? Use when the user wants a plain-English breakdown of something technical — the who, what, where, why, and when.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read current stock research, technical backtests, saved analyses or saved backtests. Use for a named ticker or watchlist research history; preserve source dates, model limitations and risk factors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and edit OpenAI Cookbook notebooks, Markdown, and MDX for technical accuracy, clarity, grammar, consistency, runnable examples, and repository publication requirements. Use for editorial reviews, pre-merge documentation checks, or notebook Markdown-cell sweeps in openai-cookbook.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clarify a material user-owned product decision before substantive implementation commitments. Use only when request and named/governing evidence still leave a choice that would materially change scope, platform support, user-facing surface, data/API contract, domain values, project placement, or cross-system architecture; also use when a truncated request omits such a choice. On the initial turn, inspect only named or governing requirements evidence, then ask directly without loading: prefer structured input; ask one blocking outcome question or at most three coupled questions; wait. After the answer, load the body before write or delegation. Do not use for implement/build/fix/debug/refactor work when expected behavior is settled, plan/design deliverables owned by Plan, complexity/greenfield/integration alone, agent-owned technical choices, locally discoverable facts, reversible defaults, permission to begin, or stop/no-tool turns. Never re-ask supplied facts or turn clarification into refusal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' 'optimize for Claude/Gemini,' 'llms.txt,' 'llms-full.txt,' 'OKF,' 'Open Knowledge Format,' 'knowledge bundle,' 'agent-readable site,' 'agent readiness,' 'is my site agent-ready,' 'WebMCP,' 'do listicles still work for AI,' 'ChatGPT stopped citing comparison pages,' 'how do LLMs see our brand,' 'LinkedIn for AEO,' or 'AI citation format shift.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," "indexing issues," "stuck on page 2," "striking distance keywords," "title tag rewrite," "low CTR," "local SEO," "Google Business Profile," or "map pack." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," "site navigation," "which website builder should I use," "migrate my website," or "add a blog to my existing site." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have, how they connect, and where to build them. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
System architect and technical design leader. Use when the user asks to talk to Winston or requests the architect
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work out and record the architecture decisions that keep separately built parts of a system consistent, in a short architecture document. Creates, updates, or validates one; works from a spec, a raw idea, or an existing codebase. Use when the user says "create the architecture", "create technical architecture", "architecture spine", or "create a solution design"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes an architecture decision record (ADR) for a decision the team has already reached: the context, the options weighed, the choice and its consequences. Use when the user says "record this decision", "write an ADR", "we decided X, capture it", or asks to document a technical choice already made. Not for making the decision itself or for tracking the work it leads to.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Searches scientific and technical web content with Exa and extracts page or PDF text from URLs in batches. Supports scholarly discovery with the publication category and academic domain filters. Applies to requests to search the web, look up current research, fetch a page, or extract an article using Exa.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates or edits images with AI models through the OpenRouter Image API (Gemini, Seedream, Recraft, GPT-Image, Riverflow). Use for photos, illustrations, artwork, concept art, visual assets, logos, and image editing or compositing from reference images. For flowcharts, circuits, pathways, and other technical diagrams, use the scientific-schematics skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn research papers or inventor materials into evidence-grounded Chinese invention patent drafts and technical disclosures. Use for 技术交底书、专利撰写、现有技术对比 and Chinese DOCX patent packages; not general manuscript writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Access 20+ years of global financial data: equities, options, forex, crypto, commodities, economic indicators, and 50+ technical indicators.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to search live software / tech / data / engineering job listings across many countries and markets (and remote) via the freehire.me aggregator's public API, or to look up a specific posting. It aggregates roles from ~50 ATS platforms into one schema, so a single skill covers many markets — but its faceted filtering (skills, category, seniority) is tuned tech-first, so scope triggers to technical roles. Trigger phrases: find a tech job, software job search, developer jobs, engineering vacancies, data/ML jobs, DevOps roles, remote developer jobs, "are there any <tech role> jobs in <place>", look up this freehire job posting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Per-token details for a specific token identified by keyword, symbol, or contract address: (1) search — find tokens by keyword/symbol/contract; (2) meta — static info: name, symbol, logo, social links, creator, official website; (3) dynamic — real-time market data: price, 24h change, volume, holder count, liquidity; (4) kline — OHLCV candlestick data for technical analysis. Use for: "price of $X", "search for token Y", "kline chart for $Z", "who created $W", "social links for $V", "holder count of $U", "candlestick data", "find the contract address of <token>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic code refactoring based on Martin Fowler's methodology. Use when users ask to refactor code, improve code structure, reduce technical debt, clean up legacy code, eliminate code smells, or improve code maintainability. This skill guides through a phased approach with research, planning, and safe incremental implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates task-oriented technical documentation with progressive disclosure. Use when writing READMEs, API docs, architecture docs, or markdown documentation. Also use this skill at the END of any completed reverse engineering, penetration testing, CTF, or security analysis task to generate a formal report in the user's project directory. Trigger keywords: 写报告, 写文档, 出报告, writeup, 技术文档, report, documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。