「termin」の検索結果

Interactive voice-narrated tutorial on whatever the current conversation is about — teaches the topic beat by beat with ASCII diagrams in the terminal while speaking the actual lesson content aloud, asking one question per beat and quizzing until the ideas land. USE WHEN teach me, /teach-me, tutorial, teach me this, walk me through this interactively, explain this like a lesson, learn mode, quiz me, help me actually understand what we just did. NOT FOR plain written explanations with no dialogue (just answer directly), authored/published content, or discovery interviews that shape a half-formed idea (use grill-me).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Renders the current session's output (analysis, research, red team, report, plan) as an extremely well-designed, self-contained HTML artifact via a deterministic renderer — the model distills content into typed JSON, the tool owns all layout/typography/color. USE WHEN /HTML, HTML artifact, render this as HTML, make this an HTML page, artifact of this analysis, designed HTML output. NOT FOR deployed websites or web apps (build the project directly), web UI design systems (use Webdesign), static images or diagrams (use Art), or writing the underlying analysis itself (run the analysis first, then /HTML renders it).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assertion-first AI eval framework aligned to Anthropic's 'Demystifying evals for AI agents' — typed deterministic asserts + a forced-structured LLM judge over an input→assert case schema, pass^k/pass@k, capability vs regression suites, subscription-billed. USE WHEN eval, evaluate, benchmark, regression test, assertion, assert, llm-rubric, judge, pass@k, pass^k, grade output, compare prompts/models, test agent. NOT FOR scientific-method framing (use Science), property/mutation testing of code (use Hardening), or live UI verification (use Interceptor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects AI-generated writing four ways — a heuristic audit against a catalog of known AI patterns, deterministic statistical signals (n-gram entropy, burstiness, repetition, stylometry — features never verdicts), an empirical Pangram score calibrated against known-human baselines, and a keyless scan for watermark and steganography signatures (invisible characters, homoglyphs, bidi, odd whitespace) in the bytes. USE WHEN detect AI writing, is this AI, AI detection, AI detector, did an AI write this, does this sound like AI, AI writing score, pangram, scan for AI tells, flag AI patterns, AI-isms, statistical AI signals, burstiness, text entropy, is this watermarked, detect watermark, steganography, zero-width chars, hidden characters, invisible unicode, compare drafts for AI-ness. NOT FOR rewriting prose to strip AI patterns (use a voice/authoring skill), plagiarism detection, detecting AI-generated images/video/code, or judging whether writing is any good.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when building agent evaluation systems: deterministic checks, regression suites, multi-dimensional rubrics, quality gates, production monitoring, baseline comparison, and outcome measurement for agent pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a working artifact from a plain "implement X for me" request: a running end-to-end spine first, then one feature per rung, with every under-determined decision written to an assumption ledger BEFORE the code that depends on it and a sweep for the ones that slipped through undeclared (same-family provisional in the base Codex mirror). Use when user says "给我实现", "implement X", "帮我做一个能跑的", "先搭个原型再加功能", "build this feature", "prototype then extend", or hands over a capability description rather than an experiment plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes rigorous mathematical proofs for ML/AI theory. Use when asked to prove a theorem, lemma, proposition, or corollary, fill in missing proof steps, formalize a proof sketch, 补全证明, 写证明, 证明某个命题, or determine whether a claimed proof can actually be completed under the stated assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a working artifact from a plain "implement X for me" request: a running end-to-end spine first, then one feature per rung, with every under-determined decision written to an assumption ledger BEFORE the code that depends on it and a cross-model sweep for the ones that slipped through undeclared. Use when user says "给我实现", "implement X", "帮我做一个能跑的", "先搭个原型再加功能", "build this feature", "prototype then extend", or hands over a capability description rather than an experiment plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate deterministic publication-quality architecture, workflow, and pipeline diagrams from structured JSON (FigureSpec) into editable SVG. Use when user says "架构图", "workflow 图", "pipeline 图", "确定性矢量图", "figure spec", "draw architecture", or needs precise, editable, publication-ready vector diagrams. Preferred over AI illustration for formal architecture/workflow figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect Codex to any app via the Composio CLI. Send emails, create issues, post messages, update databases - take real actions across Gmail, Slack, GitHub, Notion, and 1000+ services from the terminal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect Claude to external apps via the Composio CLI. Use this skill when the user wants to send emails, create issues, post messages, or take actions across Gmail, Slack, GitHub, Notion, and 1000+ services from the terminal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a deterministic, read-only health check on an Obsidian wiki. Use for lint, vault health check, audit wiki health, find orphans, find dead links, frontmatter audit, provenance audit, or wiki audit. Reports graph, link, frontmatter, provenance-ledger, empty-section, and stale-index findings; it does not reason broadly or repair files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Fable-derived 10-stage OBSERVE, OBSERVE, LISTEN, THINK, CONNECT, CONNECT, FEEL, ACCEPT, CREATE, GROW loop to consequential or ambiguous reasoning and decisions. Use for think this through, deep think, architecture review, postmortem, tradeoff analysis, or challenges to assumptions. This is a reasoning review, not a deterministic vault health check or repair workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and query a vault-local contextual BM25 retrieval index with optional multilingual Nomic cosine reranking; use for retrieve, hybrid retrieval, BM25, rerank, contextual retrieval, chunk search, vault search, semantic search, find relevant passages, or retrieval diagnostics. Derived caches stay under .vault-meta, remote egress requires explicit consent, and unavailable reranking falls back deterministically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Personalized audit that teaches the advanced Superset features the user isn't using yet (automations, parallel agents, tasks, multi-host, terminal remote control, custom commands, MCP, pages) and sets them up live. Use when the user wants to get more out of Superset, asks "what else can Superset do", "how do I 10x my workflow", "what am I missing", or wants to learn a specific Superset feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Digest of what the user's Superset agents did while they were away, sweeping workspaces, tasks, and agent terminals to report what finished, what needs review, and what's blocked. Use when the user asks "what did my agents do", "what happened while I was away", wants a standup or summary of agent work, or returns after a break.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and update the Superset desktop app's user settings (theme, fonts, terminal, git, notifications, behavior) via the superset CLI, including creating and installing custom themes from JSON. Use when asked to change app settings, switch or create a theme, adjust fonts, or configure desktop preferences without opening the settings UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records a running CARLA simulation to a .log file via start_recorder/stop_recorder for later deterministic replay — capturing actor spawns, transforms, traffic-light states and animations (optionally velocities/controls). Use when the user asks to "record the simulation", "start/stop the recorder", "capture this run", or "save a scenario to replay later". Does NOT capture sensor images.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads and changes a running CARLA server's WorldSettings via apply_settings — synchronous vs asynchronous mode, fixed_delta_seconds (fps), physics substepping, and no_rendering_mode — and keeps the Traffic Manager's sync state matched automatically. Use when the user asks to "enable/disable sync mode", "set synchronous mode", "run at a fixed fps/step", "turn off rendering", "make the sim deterministic", or "restore async mode", and as the prerequisite for keeping settings across a map load.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building CLI tools, implementing argument parsing, or adding interactive prompts. Invoke for parsing flags and subcommands, displaying progress bars and spinners, generating bash/zsh/fish completion scripts, CLI design, shell completions, and cross-platform terminal applications using commander, click, typer, or cobra.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the validation phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to determine whether one or more candidate security findings are valid. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI citability scoring and optimization. Analyzes web page content to determine how likely AI systems (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) are to cite or quote passages from the page. Provides a citability score (0-100) with specific rewrite suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI crawler access analysis. Checks robots.txt, meta tags, and HTTP headers to determine which AI crawlers can access the site. Provides a complete access map and recommendations for maximizing AI visibility while maintaining appropriate control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。