「trust」の検索結果

Reviews the design of an existing Power Pages site - a live URL or a local project folder - and recommends what to change, without modifying anything. Captures up to eight key pages at desktop and mobile, scores them against the plugin's design rubric (first impression, hierarchy, narrative, copy, trust, brand, responsive and accessible design, motion, detail), and returns prioritized, concrete recommendations. Use when the user wants a design review, critique, or audit of a site, asks how to make an existing site look better, more polished, or more impressive, or asks why it looks generic or dated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keeps the engagement record for client work. Use when they name a client or stakeholder. Use when they debrief a meeting or paste notes. Use when they ask what was agreed. Use when they run a POC, change the client's codebase, prove it on their staging, go live, or need evals before a model acts. Use when they prep a readout, when trust shifts, or they say @fde. Route and run the local fde CLI (or npx --yes fdeops). Never ask them to type commands. Not for ordinary code edits in an unbound repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage an outage, loss of stakeholder trust or a failing engagement direction. Use for urgent recovery; distinguish diagnosis from authorized production mitigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How humans and AI compose in content workflows. Where AI legitimately participates, where humans must own, hybrid workflow patterns, voice ownership preservation, the AI slop problem, disclosure and transparency, team calibration, and the ethics of intellectually honest AI-assisted content production. Triggers on AI content workflow, AI-assisted writing, hybrid content production, AI in editorial, AI slop, AI disclosure, AI usage policy, AI content ethics, voice preservation with AI, team AI calibration. Also triggers when content feels generic despite quality tools, when team AI usage has drifted into inconsistency, or when a regulated or trust-sensitive context requires explicit AI policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce honest product reviews and buying guides without fabricated first-hand experience, using disclosed evidence tiers: verified specs, owner-experience synthesis at scale, expert triangulation, and hands-on only when true. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write product reviews or buying guides without hands-on access, set up a review methodology, add evidence disclosure to review content, align reviews with Google's reviews system or FTC affiliate disclosure expectations, or decide when Review and Product schema are honest to use. Triggers on product review, buying guide, best-of list, review methodology, evidence basis, hands-on testing, we tested, affiliate review site, review disclosure, methodology block, original research, reviews system. Also triggers when review content claims testing that did not happen, or when an affiliate site needs a trust mechanism that survives scrutiny.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor covering all four functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST AI RMF, AI risk management, AI trustworthiness, GOVERN function, MAP function, MEASURE function, MANAGE function, AI RMF Playbook, AI risk profiles, responsible AI, AI bias management, AI transparency, AI explainability, AI reliability, AI safety, NIST AI 100-1, AI risk assessment, AI incident response, or alignment to EU AI Act, ISO 42001, or NIST CSF via AI RMF. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any NIST AI RMF or AI governance risk question should use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) compliance advisor for essential and important entities: entity classification, Art. 21 risk management measures, Art. 23 incident reporting timelines (24h/72h/1 month), Art. 20 governance obligations, supply chain security (Art. 21(2)(d); coordinated risk assessments Art. 22), gap assessments, policy drafting, ISO 27001 alignment, and penalty exposure analysis. Also covers Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, the technical/methodological sub-requirements for Art. 21(2) and the significant-incident thresholds binding on DNS/cloud/data-centre/MSP/MSSP/trust-service and other digital entities. Use for NIS2 readiness, transposition questions, ENISA technical implementation guidance, significant-incident thresholds, supervisory differences between essential and important entities, and cross-border coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) advisor for the automotive supply chain — the ENX/VDA assessment regime that OEMs like VW, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz require from suppliers and service providers. Covers the VDA ISA 6 catalogue (current through 2026) and the ISA2027 transition (published July 1, 2026; mandatory for assessments ordered from January 1, 2027), assessment levels AL1/AL2/AL3, all 12 assessment objectives/labels (Confidential, Strictly Confidential, High/Very High Availability, Proto Parts/Vehicles, Test Vehicles, Proto Events, Data, Special Data), maturity scoring (0–5, target 3, cutback rules), the ENX portal process, scoping, audit-provider selection, corrective action plans and the 9-month window, 3-year label validity, and ISO 27001 mapping. Use for any TISAX, VDA ISA, ENX, automotive information-security assessment, prototype protection, or OEM supplier-security requirement question — gap assessments, label selection, readiness, and audit prep.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-landing PR review with two-pass checklist. Pass 1 critical: SQL safety, race conditions, LLM trust boundaries, enum completeness. Pass 2 informational: side effects, magic numbers, dead code, test gaps. Adversarial review auto-scaled by diff size. Scope drift detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, run, debug, and operate applications on AWS Lambda MicroVMs — Firecracker-isolated, snapshot-resumable serverless compute environments that run inside a container with up to 8-hour lifetimes. Triggers on: Lambda MicroVMs, Firecracker isolation, snapshot-resumable compute, suspend/resume, sandboxed or untrusted code execution, AI/agent code-execution sandboxes, interactive code playgrounds and notebooks (Jupyter, REPLs), reinforcement-learning environments, multi-tenant CI executors and build runners, sessionful game or simulation servers, isolated security scanners, long-lived sessions, or port-listening servers (gRPC, WebSocket, custom TCP). For standard event-driven Lambda functions, use the aws-lambda skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a trusted capture-and-triage front door so no commitment lives in your head. Use when open loops keep slipping, an inbox has become a backlog, or vague notes never turn into action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit and vulnerability scanning for AI agent skills before install. Detects prompt injection, dangerous code, exfiltration, credential harvesting, and supply chain risks. Use when evaluating untrusted skills or gating installs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and repair an internal knowledge base — staleness, ownership gaps, orphans, duplication, and findability. Use when the wiki is untrusted, docs are out of date, nobody owns pages, or search returns the wrong answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit brand entity facts AI engines trust: Wikidata, Knowledge Panel. "is our Knowledge Panel accurate"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a judge/grader and human-labeled data, and wants to measure how well the judge agrees with humans, detect systematic biases, determine whether automatic evaluation can replace human review, or build a human-reduction roadmap. Also use when the user mentions calibration, TPR/TNR, judge validation, inter-rater agreement, Cohen's kappa, bias detection, or "is my automatic evaluation trustworthy." Merges the calibrate and align functions into one skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an AI agent skill before installing it. Use proactively whenever the user is about to add, install, enable, or evaluate an unfamiliar skill — including phrases like "audit this skill", "is this skill safe", "scan skill before install", "check skill for malicious code", "review this plugin", or any pre-install gate on an untrusted, third-party, or community-distributed skill bundle. Runs ten categories of static checks (code execution, network exfiltration, credential harvesting, persistence, prompt injection, supply-chain hooks, obfuscation, destructive filesystem ops, secrets, Trojan Source / homoglyphs) and emits a PASS / WARN / FAIL verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (NIST AI 100-1 + the NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile) to a specific AI system, governance question, or impact assessment. Three modes — consult, governance plan, full assessment — all cite Subcategories (`GOVERN 1.1`) and Profile Action IDs (`GV-1.2-001`) verbatim. Use when the user mentions the AI RMF, NIST RMF, NIST AI 100-1, NIST AI 600-1, GenAI Profile, the four functions (Govern / Map / Measure / Manage), the trustworthy AI characteristics, the 12 GAI risks (confabulation, harmful bias, information integrity, CBRN, data privacy, etc.), or asks "what does NIST say about X" for an AI system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor covering all four functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST AI RMF, AI risk management, AI trustworthiness, GOVERN function, MAP function, MEASURE function, MANAGE function, AI RMF Playbook, AI risk profiles, responsible AI, AI bias management, AI transparency, AI explainability, AI reliability, AI safety, NIST AI 100-1, AI risk assessment, AI incident response, or alignment to EU AI Act, ISO 42001, or NIST CSF via AI RMF. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any NIST AI RMF or AI governance risk question should use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) compliance advisor for essential and important entities: entity classification, Art. 21 risk management measures, Art. 23 incident reporting timelines (24h/72h/1 month), Art. 20 governance obligations, supply chain security (Art. 21(2)(d); coordinated risk assessments Art. 22), gap assessments, policy drafting, ISO 27001 alignment, and penalty exposure analysis. Also covers Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, the technical/methodological sub-requirements for Art. 21(2) and the significant-incident thresholds binding on DNS/cloud/data-centre/MSP/MSSP/trust-service and other digital entities. Use for NIS2 readiness, transposition questions, ENISA technical implementation guidance, significant-incident thresholds, supervisory differences between essential and important entities, and cross-border coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete prep for all three scored components of the California Bar Exam: the five written ESSAYS (13 subjects — Business Associations, Civil Procedure, Community Property, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Professional Responsibility, Real Property, Remedies, Torts, Trusts, Wills & Succession), the PERFORMANCE TEST, and the multiple-choice MBE (7 subjects). Trigger whenever someone is studying for the California bar (or the MBE) and says things like: "give me the rule for [issue]", "big issues in [subject]", "drill/quiz me on [topic]", "MBE questions on [subject]", "teach me [doctrine]", "build an attack outline", "grade my essay", "memorizable paragraph for [issue]", "performance test approach", or "make a study plan" — or names any tested essay/MBE subject in a study, memorization, drilling, or practice-question context. Also trigger when a student uploads a practice essay, PT, or question set to be graded or turned into rule blocks. When in doubt during bar prep, trigger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a restorative practice protocol for addressing harm, rebuilding trust, and restoring relationships. Use when managing conflict, behavioural incidents, or relationship breakdown between students.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps intelligence for local SEO — geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification (Google/Bing/Apple/OSM), competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation from API data. Three-tier capability: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO (full intelligence), DataForSEO + Google (maximum coverage). Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", "maps analysis", "local rank tracking", "Share of Local Voice", or "SoLV".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write professional, empathetic responses to App Store reviews that build trust and turn critics into fans. Use when responding to negative reviews, drafting templates for common review types, or improving review management strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Virtual Machines development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when choosing VM/VMSS sizes, configuring disks/GPU/InfiniBand, using ADE/CMK, Trusted Launch, or Oracle/HPC workloads, and other Azure Virtual Machines related development tasks. Not for Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (use azure-data-science-vm), SQL Server on Azure Virtual Machines (use azure-sql-virtual-machines), Azure Virtual Machine Scale Sets (use azure-vm-scalesets), Azure Virtual Desktop (use azure-virtual-desktop).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。