「without」の検索結果

End-user browser automation with cmux. Use when you need to open sites, inspect or interact with browser surfaces, wait for page state, and extract data without stealing focus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Board meeting preparation for the adversarial scenario, not the friendly one. Forces numbers-cold mastery, anticipates hard questions, builds a narrative that acknowledges weakness without losing the room. Use when preparing for a board meeting, an investor update, fundraising presentation, or any high-stakes adversarial review where every number must live in your head not just on a slide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts a markdown PR writeup or code review (one with ```diff fenced blocks and severity-tagged > [!BLOCKER]/[!MAJOR]/[!MINOR]/[!NIT] callouts) into a single-file 2-column HTML review — unified-diff on the left, severity-tagged annotation cards on the right, top jump-nav listing every finding, mandatory named reviewer footer. Triggers when the markdown-html-orchestrator classifies an input as REVIEW, or when invoked directly via /cs:md-review. Refuses without explicit --reviewer (a code review must name a human), refuses if no diff hunks present (route to md-document instead), and refuses to encode severity in color only (every badge ships color + icon + aria-label per WCAG 1.4.1). Use after orchestrator routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:founder-mode <question> — Auto-routes any founder question to the right C-role advisor or to /cs:boardroom for multi-role topics. The single-command entry point. Use when a founder asks any strategic question without knowing which advisor or command fits — e.g. 'runway pressure' routes to the CFO, 'gross retention dropped' routes to the CCO.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building a quarterly bookings forecast, ARR projection, pipeline forecast, NRR projection, or commit/best-case/pipe-only board number — especially when the CRO needs to walk the board through funnel math + cohort ARR + per-stage conversion assumptions without the theatre of a single undefended number. Decomposes pipeline into commit, best-case, and pipe-only tiers; projects cohort-level NRR/GRR to surface leaky cohorts before they show up in the consolidated number; scores per-stage funnel confidence so soft-floor stages get treated differently from high-confidence ones. Every output explicitly names the conversion rate used, the data window, and the weighting choice. For Head of Commercial, RevOps, VP Sales, and CRO at quarterly forecast or board prep. NOT financial close (see finance/financial-analysis). NOT strategic CRO hiring/territory (see c-level-advisor/cro-advisor). NOT pricing (see sibling pricing-strategist).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:caio-review <plan> — Eval-demanding Chief AI Officer interrogation of any plan that involves AI: model selection, risk classification, cost economics, or AI hiring. Use when shipping an AI feature without an eval set, choosing between API, fine-tune, and self-hosted, or classifying a use case under the EU AI Act.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:cpo-review <plan> — JTBD-driven interrogation of product roadmap, PMF signal, and portfolio focus. Use when committing a quarter's roadmap, deciding whether to kill a feature, or claiming PMF without a retention curve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running an annual SaaS audit, doing category-level spend review, or rationalizing the supplier base — when the user needs a spend audit, spend categorization (UNSPSC-aligned with Pareto breakdown and industry profiles), purchasing-cycle analysis (bottleneck categories per Goldratt's Theory of Constraints), or risk-balanced supplier consolidation that refuses single-source recommendations for tier-1 categories without a documented break-glass plan. Triggers on "spend audit", "SaaS audit", "spend categorization", "supplier rationalization", "supplier consolidation", "category strategy", "duplicate SaaS", "renewal cluster".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework for rolling out organizational changes without chaos. Covers the ADKAR model adapted for startups, communication templates, resistance patterns, and change fatigue management. Handles process changes, org restructures, strategy pivots, and culture changes. Use when announcing a reorg, switching tools, pivoting strategy, killing a product, changing leadership, or when user mentions change management, change rollout, managing resistance, org change, reorg, or pivot communication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close out a launched Claude Managed Agent — recap every primitive the founder now owns, regenerate the single-file overview page, and suggest the next 1-2 upgrades. Use when the user says "wrap up", "close this out", "what do I own now", "give me the summary", "recap the agent", or when the orchestrator routes phase=wrap-up. primitives_inventory.py tables everything owned (agent, environment, session, memory, outcome, deployment); overview_page.py regenerates a self-contained ./my-agent/agent-overview.html; upgrade_suggester.py ranks the next moves from recorded deferrals plus standing hardening steps. Companion to run-without-you; the last stop before phase=done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 3 of building a Claude Managed Agent — the bounded grade→iterate loop. Define a CMA outcome (a required markdown rubric graded by an isolated grader), read each verdict, decide the next move (sharpen / re-run / promote to schedule), and once a version passes, run held-back eval cases in parallel. Use when the user says "grade my agent", "make it pass the rubric", "iterate until it's good", "is it good enough", or when the orchestrator routes phase=grade-iterate. outcome_builder.py builds the user.define_outcome payload (rubric required, max_iterations clamped 1..20 — never unbounded); verdict_reader.py reads the grader result and recommends the next move; eval_scaffold.py generates held-back cases + a parallel run plan (capped at the 25-thread CMA ceiling). Distinct from stage-launch (first launch) and run-without-you (scheduling).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 1 of building a Claude Managed Agent — interview the founder about the one job the agent should do, then produce a build sheet (CMA primitives table + v1/v2 deferrals + eval plan) WITHOUT needing their API key yet. Use when the user says "help me scope an agent", "I have an idea for an agent", "what should this agent be", or when the orchestrator routes phase=interview. Drives the six intake slots (job, trigger, inputs, actions, definition-of-done, recurrence) via AskUserQuestion, maps them to primitives with interview_planner.py, assembles build-sheet.json with build_sheet_builder.py, and validates limits with primitives_validator.py. Connectors are mockable in v0 (schema-true custom tools); real MCP servers become v1 deferrals. Distinct from stage-launch (which turns the sheet into payloads).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**MANDATORY prerequisite** — you MUST invoke this skill BEFORE every `use_figma` tool call. NEVER call `use_figma` directly without loading this skill first. Skipping it causes common, hard-to-debug failures. Trigger whenever the user wants to perform a write action or a unique read action that requires JavaScript execution in the Figma file context — e.g. create/edit/delete nodes, set up variables or tokens, build components and variants, modify auto-layout or fills, bind variables to properties, or inspect file structure programmatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify grammar, logical, and flow errors in text and suggest targeted fixes without rewriting the entire text. Use when proofreading content, checking writing quality, or reviewing a draft.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retune a skill corpus for a new model, measurement-first: mine the run archive for a baseline, establish a noise floor, audit the corpus adversarially, then cut in measured passes until a pre-registered bar clears. Requires a benchmark harness that can A/B two builds of the corpus; refuses without one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a plan or concrete work prompt end-to-end. Use when implementing from a plan document, a spec path, or a clear build request; use ce-debug for open-ended bugs. Use when an outer orchestrator needs implementation and local verification only, without the shipping tail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a session handoff for another agent, or resume, find, and read any user-selected continuity source. Use when work or conversation must continue without access to the current session history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take a request all the way to done, hands-off, through the right Compound Engineering skills. A code change ends as an open pull request, pushed without stopping. Use only when the user explicitly asks for autonomous end-to-end work or invokes lfg directly. Use ce-plan, ce-work, ce-debug, or ce-commit-push-pr for work the user reviews step by step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and ask questions about coding agent session history across Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Use when asking what was worked on, what was tried before, how a problem was investigated across sessions, what happened recently, or any question about past agent sessions. Also use when the user references prior sessions, previous attempts, or past investigations — even without saying 'sessions' explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain the slopus/happy open source project. Triage issues, draft closing comments, find duplicates, check if bugs are fixed on main, and engage with community contributors. NEVER posts comments or closes issues without showing exact text and getting approval first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make the desktop's model provider fail on demand (connection refused, DNS not found, socket reset, 429, 5xx, 401, 402, stalled or cut stream) with a local fault server and test providers. Use when reproducing or designing model error and retry states without a real outage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: User wants to extend Docker with custom tools, personalize the Docker environment, or set up user-specific Docker customization. Triggers: 'extend docker', 'docker-extend', 'add tools to docker', 'customize docker', 'add my tools to the container', 'personalize docker setup', 'docker user setup', 'install tools in docker'. Does: Interactively sets up Dockerfile.user and docker-compose.override.yml so users can add personal tools to their Docker environment without affecting maintainer files or committing user-specific config to git.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify the OpenSEO MCP server end-to-end on a local dev server — protocol-level correctness against real DataForSEO, then a headless-agent consumer probe that tests tool ergonomics (descriptions, schemas, output size, errors, async flows) without the maintainer manually driving an MCP client. Use after adding or changing MCP tools, or when asked to check that the MCP "works" or "is ergonomic".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。