「what」の検索結果

Runtime router for context decisions during a task — decide read-more / stop / ask / assume / delegate, pick a minimal read-set, and time compaction. Front-page mental model is Write / Select / Compress / Isolate; a lazy pattern index routes to 25 context-engineering patterns, one reference per decision. Use when context is near budget, a long session is degrading, you must choose what to read for a task, or you are deciding /compact vs /clear vs a sub-agent. NOT for structural .claude/ overhead audits (see mk:context-audit); NOT for owning persistence (see mk:memory); NOT for USD cost (see mk:budget).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve up-to-date library, framework, and project documentation using scripts + MCP tools (Context7, Context Hub) with intelligent fallback. Use this skill whenever the user or agent needs documentation for any library, framework, API, SDK, or internal project spec. Triggers on "docs for [X]", "how does [library] work", "find documentation", "API reference for", "look up [feature] in [library]", "latest docs", "what's the API for", "find our [internal spec]", or any request that requires current, accurate documentation rather than relying on training data. Always prefer this skill over raw WebSearch for documentation retrieval — it returns structured, context-efficient results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-ship documentation update. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, cleans up TODOS, and optionally bumps VERSION. Use when asked to "update the docs", "sync documentation", or "post-ship docs". Proactively suggest after a PR is created and before it merges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when answering factual or explanatory questions about the current project — codebase, architecture, conventions, workflows, constraints — with minimal cited evidence. Triggers on "how does X work here", "what does X mean", "why is X structured this way", "is this claim true in the repo", "explain X with sources". NOT for brainstorming or comparing approaches (mk:brainstorming), trade-off decisions (mk:party), debugging/root cause (mk:investigate), code review (mk:review), plans (mk:plan-creator), security audits (mk:cso), visual explanations/diagrams (mk:preview --explain), test-coverage gaps (mk:nyquist), library docs (mk:docs-finder), or workflow navigation (mk:help).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after code changes, before releases, or when testing features - runs the right level of QA based on what changed

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spin up a working LiveAvatar demo from a curated catalog — clones the reference repo, installs dependencies, provisions the LiveAvatar account, and fills the env file, then hands off the parts only a human can do. Use when: (1) User wants to try, test, see, or demo LiveAvatar, (2) User asks what LiveAvatar demos or examples exist, (3) User wants a sales agent / lead-qualification avatar, (4) User wants a LiveKit agent driving a LiveAvatar avatar, (5) User wants an avatar joining their own LiveKit room, (6) User wants a speech-to-speech avatar, a GPT-Live demo, a language-learning or tutor avatar, a customer-support avatar, a poker coach / game-style avatar, or an avatar with on-screen visuals/overlays, (7) User says "run the LiveAvatar demo", "show me LiveAvatar", "get me started with LiveAvatar", or "clone the LiveAvatar example", (8) User is evaluating LiveAvatar and wants something running before writing their own integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when taking a repo open source, or hardening one that already is. Run /oss-launch and it scans the repo (stack, existing files, git remote, secrets), asks only what it cannot infer, then generates a tailored OSS file collection (README, LICENSE, CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT, SECURITY, CHANGELOG, .gitignore, .github/ issue + PR templates, CI/CD). Also covers launch (GitHub metadata, badges, Show HN, Reddit, YouTube), release cadence (SemVer + CHANGELOG), and demo-GIF generation. Triggers on "open source this", "OSS checklist", "prep for launch", "make this repo public", "add a license / contributing / security policy", "Show HN", "release workflow", "star growth", "get contributors".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pixel-faithful clone of any web UI into the user's existing stack, using whatever sources are available — a screenshot alone, a live URL, raw HTML/CSS, or any combination. Use this skill whenever the user wants to recreate, match, replicate, or "clone" a design from a screenshot, image, URL, Figma export, or HTML dump. Trigger on phrases like "clone this", "match this design", "build this from screenshot", "recreate this page", "make it look like this", "rebuild this UI", "copy this layout", or any time the user provides a visual reference and asks for a faithful implementation. Do not undertrigger — even if the user just drops a screenshot without explicit phrasing, this skill applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for ANY of the following — do not skip it even if the query seems simple: strategic decisions, business analysis, thesis building, complex problem solving, geopolitical analysis (non-market), philosophical reasoning, academic research, system design, decision under uncertainty, long-form thinking, or any question that benefits from First Principle deconstruction and multi-agent reasoning. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks about: why something works the way it does, whether a decision is correct, how to think about a complex problem, what could go wrong, analyzing a situation from multiple angles, or any "should I..." question involving real-world trade-offs. This is NOT a market/trading skill — for financial markets, BTC, gold, stocks, forex, macro economics, use money-atlas-intelligence-os instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an existing UI for usability, hierarchy, accessibility, and conversion problems. Reviews a live URL, screenshot, or codebase against heuristics and reports prioritized issues with fixes. Use when the user says "audit this UI", "what's wrong with this screen", "UX review", "find the problems", "why is this confusing", or has existing interface to critique. Part of the Product Design set. Can drive a browser for live audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect business positioning to a concrete visual language. Maps strategic positioning (category, differentiator, who-it's-for, who-it's-against) onto visual decisions — palette, type, imagery, tone — so the look reinforces the strategy. Use when the user says "positioning into visuals", "what should the brand look like given our strategy", "align visuals with positioning", or is moving from strategy to brand expression. Part of the Creative Production set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find UX pains and opportunities fast through competitor scans, pattern research, and web search. Surfaces how others solve the same flow, common failure modes, and conventions users already expect. Use when the user says "research this UX", "how do others do X", "competitor scan", "find UX patterns", "what's the convention for Y", or before ideating a flow. Part of the Product Design set. Uses web search/fetch tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick a visual direction before generating any creative. Produces 3-6 named, distinct visual directions (e.g. premium minimal, bold maximalist, lifestyle/editorial, retro, techno-brutalist) with rationale + sample prompts, then generates one reference image per direction so the user can choose. Use when the user says "explore visual direction", "what style should this be", "give me directions/looks", or before ads/scene/shot work when no style is locked. Part of the Creative Production set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate realistic product-in-use lifestyle scenes. Places the product in believable contexts of use (who, where, when, doing what) with natural lighting and real texture, for lifestyle/editorial/ecommerce. Use when the user says "lifestyle shot", "product in use", "scene", "show it being used", "in-context photography", or needs people/environment around the product. Part of the Creative Production set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Setup subskill for simmer. Inspects the artifact or workspace, infers evaluation contracts and search space, proposes a complete assessment to the user, and produces a setup brief after confirmation. Conversational, not form-based — the agent does the work of understanding the problem, then presents what it found. Do not invoke directly — called by simmer orchestrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load relevant memories at session start for context continuity. IMPORTANT: Use this AUTOMATICALLY at the START of every session. Search for memories related to: - Current working directory/project - Recent activity (last 7 days) - Topics the user mentions in their first message Execute silently - do not announce what you're loading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the project's own tests, linter, type checker and build, and report what actually failed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runnable end-to-end validation playbook for the Rembric TUI installer — catch breakage before merging/deploying, AND a sandboxed manual walkthrough to evaluate/iterate its UI/UX without polluting your real env. Apply before shipping any change touching `apps/plugin/install.sh`, the repo-root `install.sh` shim, any per-client `install.sh`/`uninstall.sh`, or distribution docs, or when you want to preview/try/demo the installer and polish how it looks and feels. Layered: CI-safe headless (vitest + `sh -n`), local install round-trips, operator interactive pty smoke, an optional full Docker `up` smoke, plus a sandboxed manual UX walkthrough. For the installer contract/what-not-to-break, see `rembric-tui-installer`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pragmatic testing guidance focused on confidence, behavior over implementation details, and integration-first coverage. Use when designing a test strategy, writing or reviewing tests, reducing brittle mocks, or deciding what is worth testing in an application or library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Rembric TUI installer contract — the single, canonical install/setup/upgrade/uninstall path (`apps/plugin/install.sh`, fronted by the repo-root `install.sh` shim). Apply when touching `install.sh`, the root shim, any per-client `install.sh`/`uninstall.sh`, `marketplace.json`, or distribution docs (README, `docs/agents.md`, plugin/client READMEs). Covers the orchestrator model, what must not break, and where the source of truth lives. For running the validation suite, use `rembric-tui-installer-e2e`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses the quality and completeness of a genome annotation with BUSCO (conserved single-copy ortholog recovery), OMArk (proteome completeness, consistency, and contamination), CheckM2 (prokaryotic completeness/contamination), and a gene-set sanity panel (gene count, mono-exonic fraction, protein-length distribution, mRNA:gene ratio, coding density). Covers the assembly-BUSCO-vs-proteome-BUSCO diagnostic, what BUSCO-Duplicated really means, why gene count is a vanity metric, and the QC of transferred annotations. Use when judging whether an annotation is good enough to publish or submit, diagnosing a suspect annotation, or comparing annotation completeness across pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures biological experiments so inference is valid by construction, covering Fisher's principles (randomization, replication, local control), the experimental-vs-observational unit distinction and pseudoreplication (Hurlbert 1984; Lazic 2018), randomization mechanics (complete, restricted, stratified, rerandomization, run-order), blocking layouts (randomized complete block, Latin square, incomplete block), factorial designs and interactions, and the split-plot/nested error strata hidden inside multi-batch genomics. Use when deciding the experimental unit and what counts as a replicate, planning randomization and run order, choosing a blocked/factorial/split-plot/nested layout, avoiding pseudoreplication in cell-culture or animal studies, or specifying the random-effects structure of the analysis model. For assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates and batch-effect correction see experimental-design/batch-design; for regulated clinical-trial randomization see clinical-biostatistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。