「fix」の検索結果

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, and when a finished feature needs adversarial verification before integration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a change is small and already understood - at most three files, such as a typo, a config value, a rename, or a one-line bugfix - and a plan file would cost more than the change

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing any fix

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user hands over a GitHub issue to be delivered end to end — 'resolver a issue #42', 'loop na issue 42', 'deliver issue https://github.com/o/r/issues/42' — or when an Orca worker preamble dispatches `feat-loop #N`. Turns the issue into a plan, executes it, reviews the result and runs at most 2 fix cycles until APPROVED, then opens a pull request that closes the issue. Never merges. Do NOT use without an issue (feat-feature / feat-quick), to only plan (feat-feature), to only review (feat-review) or to execute an existing plan (feat-exec).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliver a small, bounded code change through inspection, a mini-plan, implementation, testing, review, and adversarial verification. Use for bug fixes, configuration changes, and features expected to touch no more than five files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or fixing any bug, before writing implementation code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a code review of an explicit range or set of files — correctness, security, performance, conventions, tests — with stable findings (CR-nnn, BLOCKER..INFO) and rule citations — 'revisar os últimos commits', 'code review da feature X', 'review base..HEAD'. Plans a REPORT-mode review (no code changes, no commit). Do NOT use to fix code (feat-feature / feat-quick), to write tests (feat-test) or for UI/UX design critique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a backend-only action plan — API endpoints, services, models, migrations, jobs and their tests — 'plano de backend para o endpoint X', 'plan the orders API'. Writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md with the PWDEVIA method. Do NOT use for UI work (feat-frontend), full features spanning backend and UI (feat-feature), writing code (feat-exec) or quick 1–3 file fixes (feat-quick).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make a GTK4/libadwaita app accessible — accessible labels and roles, tooltips on icon-only buttons, keyboard navigation, contrast, and testing with Orca/Accerciser. Use when fixing a11y issues or running the accessibility category of a HIG audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AdwHeaderBar layout rules: button placement, flat/icon-only buttons, tooltips, title widgets, split buttons. Use when designing or fixing a GNOME app's header bar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a GTK4/libadwaita app for GNOME HIG compliance across 12 categories (text, icons, layout, shortcuts, accessibility, color, dialogs, responsiveness, CSS, GSettings, i18n), then fix violations category by category. Use when asked to audit, review, polish, or "make HIG-compliant" a GNOME app, or before a release/Flathub submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Super-skill for developing Haskell projects with cabal nix-style builds. Orchestrates HLS diagnostics, Haddock, Hoogle, source formatting, and cabal-gild into one workflow. Use when writing, editing, refactoring, building, typechecking, fixing compiler errors, renaming symbols, looking up APIs, or changing dependencies in Haskell projects. Treat cabal.project as the source of truth, prefer HLS before full builds, and prefer local docs over remote lookup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write type-safe TypeScript code with strict mode enabled, comprehensive type definitions, proper error handling, and elimination of any types. Use when enabling TypeScript strict mode, adding types to existing JavaScript, fixing type errors, creating type definitions, using utility types, implementing type guards, avoiding any types, creating generic types, or ensuring complete type safety across the codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement test-driven development (TDD) workflow using the red-green-refactor cycle. Use when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring existing code. Always write the failing test first, then implement minimal code to pass, then refactor. Essential for ensuring code reliability, preventing regressions, improving design through testability requirements, documenting expected behavior through tests, enabling confident refactoring, and maintaining high code quality standards throughout the development process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Respond to production incidents systematically with triage, investigation, resolution, and post-mortem analysis to minimize downtime and prevent recurrence. Use when handling production outages, triaging incidents, investigating critical bugs, coordinating incident response, implementing hotfixes, conducting post-mortems, or establishing incident response procedures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous bug-hunt workflow for the Humans repository. Use when the user wants Codex to scan for real bugs, work in a dedicated git worktree branched from origin/main, commit each fix separately, push progress, and continue until diminishing returns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scrap and regenerate the in-flight EF migrations on the current branch as one consolidated migration. Use when migrations have accumulated mid-development cruft (added/removed columns, stacked add-column-to-existing-table fixes, hand-edited SQL that needs to come out, schema changes that should have been one migration but ended up as five), or when the branch has merged main and its migrations are now stuck mid-chain so `dotnet ef migrations remove` is unsafe. Triggers on phrases like 'regen the migrations', 'redo these migrations', 'scrap and regen migrations', 'consolidate the in-flight migrations', 'redo the migration stack', or any time an agent hits the mid-chain situation in `memory/architecture/migration-regen-after-rebase.md`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review, repair and steward the nightly Codex debt-sweep PR (branch codex/daily-debt/<date>). Judges every commit GOOD / REPAIR / REVERT, triages the bot review findings through /fix, lands one round-1 commit, files follow-up issues, then stewards the PR itself with a 3-round ceiling. Run by the 08:00 UTC cloud routine; also '/debt-review', '/debt-review 1789'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to add, fix, or optimize schema markup and structured data on their site. Also use when the user mentions "schema markup," "structured data," "JSON-LD," "rich snippets," "schema.org," "FAQ schema," "product schema," "review schema," "breadcrumb schema," "Google rich results," "knowledge panel," "star ratings in search," or "add structured data." Use this whenever someone wants their pages to show enhanced results in Google. For broader SEO issues, see seo-audit. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to debug, fix a bug, investigate an error, or do root cause analysis, and when users report errors, stack traces, unexpected behavior, or say something stopped working.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codify the most recent successful /scrape flow into a permanent browser-skill on disk. Future /scrape calls with the same intent run the codified script in ~200ms instead of re-driving the page. Walks back through the conversation, synthesizes script.ts + script.test.ts + fixture, runs the test in a temp dir, and asks before committing. Use when asked to "skillify", "codify", "save this scrape", or "make this permanent". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage project learnings. Review, search, prune, and export what gstack has learned across sessions. Use when asked to "what have we learned", "show learnings", "prune stale learnings", or "export learnings". Proactively suggest when the user asks about past patterns or wonders "didn't we fix this before?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designer's eye plan review — interactive, like CEO and Eng review. Rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what would make it a 10, then fixes the plan to get there. Works in plan mode. For live site visual audits, use /design-review. Use when asked to "review the design plan" or "design critique". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan with UI/UX components that should be reviewed before implementation. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restrict file edits to a specific directory for the session. Blocks Edit and Write outside the allowed path. Use when debugging to prevent accidentally "fixing" unrelated code, or when you want to scope changes to one module. Use when asked to "freeze", "restrict edits", "only edit this folder", or "lock down edits". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。