「wants」の検索結果

Build, normalize, and maintain the user's Career Context file so downstream platform outputs stay factual and consistent. Use when the user wants an agent to consolidate CV data, LinkedIn exports, GitHub history, project summaries, bio facts, achievements, or positioning into one professional source of truth before editing platform-specific assets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create GEDCOM 5.5.1 compliant genealogy files from natural language, JSON, or markdown table input. Use when the user wants to generate a family tree interchange file from research data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to build or think through a strategy via guided conversation — for a company, product, team, career, or initiative. Triggers on "help me figure out our direction", "what should we focus on", strategic planning, competitive positioning, go-to-market strategy. Also catches indirect requests like prioritization struggles or "we have too many priorities". Does NOT review existing strategy documents (use strategy-review) or brainstorm project features (use brainstorm-beagle).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants web research: gathering cited, multi-angle evidence on a specific question. Triggers on: "research X for me", "do web research on", "look up sources for", "find citations for", "gather evidence on", "what does the web say about X". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), local file search, LLM-as-judge evaluation, or paywalled/auth-gated scraping. Produces a written plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: "brainstorm this", "I have an idea for...", "help me think through this project", "what should I build", "spec this out". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews — produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan but do NOT have a brainstorm-beagle spec to plan against. quick-plan reconstructs intent from the current conversation, fans out domain-expert exploration subagents across the codebase, and synthesizes the same plan format write-plan produces — without requiring `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`. Triggers on: "quick plan", "plan this out", "plan what we just discussed", "turn this into an implementation plan", "plan this without a spec", "I don't have a spec, just plan it", "write-plan but no spec". Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants an implementation or TDD plan and there is no spec to plan against — even if they just say "plan it" after discussing a feature. Writes to `.beagle/plans/<slug>/plan.md`. If a finalized spec already exists at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, prefer write-plan. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to pressure-test a product, internal-tool, or OSS concept against Amazon's Working Backwards PRFAQ gauntlet before committing to a spec. Triggers on: "work backwards", "write a PRFAQ", "press release first", "is this idea worth building", "pressure-test this concept", "filter this before brainstorm", "is this a real product". Also catches solution-first pitches ("I want to build X that does Y") and technology-first pitches ("use AI to...") that need customer-first filtering. Produces a binary pass/fail verdict, not a polished doc. Hardcore coaching — direct, skeptical, concrete. On pass, hands off to brainstorm-beagle with a concept brief. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, scaffold projects, or draft specs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Confirms or rejects findings from review-llm-artifacts before deletes or risky refactors. Loads review-verification-protocol-style checks per finding. Use after a review run, when the user wants to reduce false positives, before fix-llm-artifacts on dead code, or when validating a full-project scan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a comprehensive prompt that hands off the current session's work to a fresh session for sub-agent-orchestrated execution. Use when the user wants to execute discussed/planned work in a new session, run a job to completion via sub-agents, or generate a portable handoff prompt with per-task verification. Assumes the target session supports sub-agents. Triggers on "subagent-prompt", "give me a prompt to run this in a new session", "hand this off to sub-agents", "execute this with sub-agents".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sync delta specs from a change to main specs. Use when the user wants to update main specs with changes from a delta spec, without archiving the change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A complete fiction-writing studio, run as a team of named specialist agents, that guides an author from a bare idea to a polished prose manuscript. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write, plan, or revise fiction — a novel, novella, short story, or series. Trigger on requests like "help me write a novel", "I have an idea for a story", "develop my characters", "build a world for my fantasy", "outline my plot", "fix this scene", "my dialogue feels flat", "give me beta-reader feedback", or any time the user is doing creative storytelling and would benefit from structured, craft-aware guidance. Also trigger when the user names a studio member (Homer, Aristotle, Fyodor, Tolkien, Scheherazade, Oscar, Max, Virginia, Borges, Bloom) or asks to switch creative roles / bring in a specialist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score candidate CVs on a 100-point scale against a Job Description. Use this skill when the user wants to evaluate, score, rank, or screen candidate CVs/resumes against a JD. Also trigger when the user mentions 'review CV', 'screen resume', 'rate candidates', 'shortlist', or any context involving matching resumes to job requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, restructure, classify, and review documentation with the Diataxis framework. Use when the user asks to create, improve, audit, or reorganize documentation of any kind: knowledge bases, help centers, onboarding guides, process docs, manuals, runbooks, product or API docs, tutorials, how-to guides, references, explanations. Also use when the user mentions Diataxis, docs taxonomy, or documentation architecture, or asks why a document feels confusing. Also use for Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100) or controlled-language rewrites of English technical docs. Not for marketing, legal, sales, press, or fiction writing unless the user wants a Diataxis-style analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。