5,821 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Exposes Claude's reasoning chain as an auditable, decomposable artifact. Quick mode (default) gives assumption inventory + weakest-link in 2 stages. Full mode (--full) adds decision branching, confidence decomposition, and falsification conditions. Triggers on "왜 그렇게 생각해", "reasoning", "근거", "show your work", "어떻게 그 결론이", "trace", "판단 근거", "why do you think that".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trains the HUMAN user's critical thinking through four modes: drill (argument-analysis items with a single defensible answer, judge stance), scene (Socratic exploration of synthetic scenes or user-supplied material, no verdicts on interpretations; includes a configure track — design the information request and verification plan for a decision before any analysis), expedition (guided audit of impossible-tier problems from verified packs), and detective (a runtime-generated multi-layer case worked as an escape room, guide-and-judge stance). Use when the user wants to practice critical thinking, analyze arguments, hunt assumptions, examine bias, train reasoning, or decide what information a decision needs first. Triggers: critical thinking practice, train my thinking, drill, scene, byom, configure, information plan, what would I need to know, spot manipulation tactics, scam literacy, 批判思考練習, 話術辨識, detective, 查案, 破案, 偵探.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codex-led multi-model workflow (Codex + Claude + Gemini). Use when the user asks to run `synapse <cmd> ...` to generate draft diffs/audits and persist artifacts to `./.synapse/**`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits websites for AI search visibility (GEO/SEO) and generates deployable artifacts (llms.txt, schema JSON-LD, robots.txt). 7-dimension scorecard tailored by site type and size, grounded in Princeton KDD 2024, Toronto 2025, and ICLR 2026 research. This skill should be used when optimizing for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, or other AI search engines. Also triggered by queries about AI search optimization, generative engine optimization, llms.txt, AI crawler configuration, schema markup for AI, citation optimization, or Google AI Mode.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, interaction states, and micro-details before shipping. Executes changes (unlike design-audit and design-critique which are report-only). Triggers on polish, finishing touches, final pass, something looks off, pre-launch, good to great.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Report ground-truth Claude token consumption and estimated cost by parsing JSONL session files directly. Use when checking API spend, auditing token usage by project/session/model, generating daily/weekly/monthly cost reports, or diagnosing ccusage undercounting. Includes subagent files that ccusage ignores.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, audit, and maintain CLAUDE.md documentation files that configure Claude Code for projects. Use this skill when (1) initializing a new project with Claude Code configuration, (2) reviewing or improving existing CLAUDE.md files, (3) organizing project instructions using progressive disclosure patterns, (4) converting repeated instructions into permanent documentation, or (5) setting up agent_docs/ structures for larger codebases. Handles the WHAT/WHY/HOW framework, conciseness optimization, and file import patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when stress-testing a proposal, plan, architecture or decision before committing to it, such as pre-mortems, assumption audits, "should we even do this?" questions, or when everyone agrees too easily. Not for code review; it challenges strategy, approach and hidden risks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate SEO and LLM-readability claims against live HTML, local fixtures, and generated artifacts. Use this skill when the user asks to prove whether title, meta description, canonical, hreflang, JSON-LD, NewsArticle.image, OpenGraph, Twitter cards, RSS autodiscovery, robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap, news-sitemap, crawler access, or performance evidence is actually present, and when subjective audits must become timestamped pass/fail reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces structured markdown session continuation documents for multi-session workflows. Captures active work streams, decisions with rationale, knowledge-file deltas learned during the session, the exact files to load next conversation, ingested content, artifacts, and open items into an ingestion-optimized handoff. Carries pending KF updates and unresolved items forward across handoff chains so context never drops. Generates a closeout checklist and echoes the starter prompt to chat. Use when approaching context limits, wrapping up a session, or managing work across conversations. Trigger on: "create a handoff," "session closeout," "wrap up this session," "build session handoff," "BSH," "continue next session," "we're running out of context," "context is getting long." Do NOT use for Memory optimization, context budget analysis, project audits, deciding whether work is ready for autonomous/Claude Code execution (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), or summaries with no continuation intent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects seven structural anti-patterns in Claude Projects that cause unpredictable output, ignored instructions, and degraded quality. Diagnoses Monolith, Orphan File, Echo Chamber, Phantom Conversation, Kitchen Sink, Misaligned Hierarchy, and Blurred Layers. Use when user says "what's wrong with my project," "Claude ignores my instructions," "diagnose my project," "why is output inconsistent," "review my project setup." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "Claude doesn't follow my rules," "my instructions keep getting overridden," "my Project isn't behaving as designed." Use alongside rootnode-project-audit if available for deeper structural analysis. Activate whenever the user describes symptoms of unreliable, inconsistent, or degraded Claude Project output, even if they do not name a specific pattern. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is Memory-layer rebalancing (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available) or scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and fixes Claude behavioral issues in system prompts and Projects using tested countermeasure templates. Use when "Claude is too verbose," "keeps hedging," "agrees with everything," "claims it did something it didn't," "won't use a tool," "fix Claude's output," "tune Claude's behavior," "Claude ignores my preferences," "adds unsolicited disclaimers," "uses too many lists." Covers ten tendencies: agreeableness (output-content + persistent-preference), hedging, verbosity, list overuse, fabricated precision, over-exploration, tool miscalibration (over- and under-triggering), LaTeX defaulting, editorial drift, self-referential fabrication. Also use when auditing a system prompt for behavioral calibration or recalibrating a pre-4.7 prompt, and when users describe recurring output problems without naming a tendency. Do NOT use for scoring a prompt's overall quality — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs Claude Code prompts and CC environments. Produces CLAUDE.md drafts, agent topologies, scope-authorization frameworks, halt triggers, Skills/hooks/MCP plans, chat-to-CC handoff specs, and EXECUTION_PLAN.md remediation plans. Five modes: DESIGN (new CC deployments), EVOLVE (updates from friction), RESEARCH (evaluate a CC tool/pattern), TEMPLATE (reusable artifacts), REMEDIATE (consume hygiene findings → produce + execute plan). Do NOT use REMEDIATE for direct cleanup (Cat 1–10 — use rootnode-repo-hygiene Phase 2). Do NOT use for hygiene scanning (rootnode-repo-hygiene), chat prompts (rootnode-prompt-validation), or chat Projects (rootnode-project-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a data analysis for quality, correctness, and reproducibility. Covers data quality assessment, assumption checking, model validation, data leakage detection, and reproducibility verification. Use when reviewing a colleague's analysis before publication, validating an ML pipeline before production deployment, auditing a report for regulatory or business decision-making, or performing a second-analyst review in a regulated environment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive a GitHub Copilot (or any bot reviewer) pull-request review to a clean pass without babysitting it: fix each finding in its own commit, reply to the review thread with the fix sha, resolve the thread, re-request the bot, and poll for the async re-review. Covers the thread node-id (PRRT_...) vs comment databaseId distinction, the resolveReviewThread GraphQL mutation, the copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] slug, and how to read the bot's verdict (COMMENTED plus a "human review recommended" banner is not a blocking finding). Use when Copilot has left review comments on your PR, when bot review threads must be closed out with an auditable fix-reply-resolve trail before merge, or when you need to verify that a re-review actually landed on the new HEAD rather than the old one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review user experience and interface design using Nielsen's heuristics, WCAG 2.1 accessibility guidelines, keyboard and screen reader audit, user flow analysis, cognitive load assessment, and form usability evaluation. Use when conducting a usability review before release, assessing WCAG 2.1 accessibility compliance, evaluating user flows for efficiency, reviewing form design, or performing a heuristic evaluation of an existing interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a SKILL.md file for compliance with the agentskills.io standard. Checks YAML frontmatter fields, required sections, line count limits, procedure step format, and registry synchronization. Use when a new skill needs format validation before merge, an existing skill has been modified and requires re-validation, performing a batch audit of all skills in a domain, or reviewing a contributor's skill submission in a pull request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register trained models in MLflow Model Registry with version control, implement stage transitions (Staging, Production, Archived) with approval workflows, and manage model lineage with comprehensive metadata and deployment tracking. Use when promoting a trained model from experimentation to production, managing multiple model versions across development stages, implementing approval workflows for governance, rolling back to previous versions, or auditing model changes for compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Contribute to OpenClaw ecosystem projects (OpenClaw, NemoClaw, NanoClaw) through a structured 9-step workflow: target verification, codebase exploration, parallel audit, finding cross-reference, and pull request creation. Emphasizes false positive prevention and project convention adherence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare an organisation for regulatory inspection by assessing readiness against agency-specific focus areas (FDA, EMA, MHRA). Covers warning letter and 483 theme analysis, mock inspection protocols, document bundle preparation, inspection logistics, and response template creation. Use when a regulatory inspection has been announced or is anticipated, when a periodic self-assessment is due, when new systems have been implemented since the last inspection, or after a significant audit finding that may attract regulatory attention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Probe the runtime state of a named feature flag in a CLI binary. Covers the four-pronged evidence protocol (binary strings, live invocation, on-disk state, platform cache), the four-state classification (LIVE / DARK / INDETERMINATE / UNKNOWN), gate-vs-event disambiguation, conjunction-gate handling, and skill-substitution scenarios where a flag appears DARK but the capability is delivered by other means. Use when verifying whether a documented or inferred capability has rolled out, when auditing dark-launched features, or when a prior probe's conclusions need refreshing against a new binary version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a pull request end-to-end using GitHub CLI. Covers diff analysis, commit history review, CI/CD check verification, severity-leveled feedback (blocking/suggestion/nit/praise), and gh pr review submission. Use when a pull request is assigned for review, performing a self-review before requesting others' input, conducting a second review after feedback is addressed, or auditing a merged PR for post-merge quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sustained neutral pattern recognition across systems without urgency or intervention. Maps naturalist field study methodology to AI reasoning: framing the observation target, witnessing with sustained attention, recording patterns, categorizing findings, generating hypotheses, and archiving a pattern library for future reference. Use when a system's behavior is unclear and action would be premature, when debugging an unknown root cause, when a codebase change needs its effects witnessed before further changes, or when auditing own reasoning patterns for biases or recurring errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and operate a data integrity monitoring programme based on ALCOA+ principles. Covers detective controls, audit trail review schedules, anomaly detection patterns (off-hours activity, sequential modifications, bulk changes), metrics dashboards, investigation triggers, and escalation matrix definition. Use when establishing a data integrity monitoring programme for GxP systems, preparing for inspections where data integrity is a focus area, after a data integrity incident requiring enhanced monitoring, or when implementing MHRA, WHO, or PIC/S guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。