「write」の検索結果

Generate Architecture Decision Records with AI. Use when documenting technical decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Music songwriting guide for ACE-Step. Provides professional knowledge on writing captions, lyrics, choosing BPM/key/duration, and structuring songs. Use this skill when users want to create, write, or plan a song before generating it with ACE-Step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify and write proofs using the Acorn theorem prover for mathematical and cryptographic formalization. Use when working with Acorn proof files (.ac), verifying theorems, formalizing mathematical or cryptographic protocols, or writing proofs in the Acorn language. Triggers on: (1) Creating or editing .ac files, (2) Running acorn verify commands, (3) Formalizing math or crypto proofs, (4) Questions about Acorn syntax or standard library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine academic writing for computer science research papers targeting top-tier venues (NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, AAAI, IJCAI, ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, CVPR, WWW, KDD, SIGIR, CIKM, and similar). Use this skill whenever a user asks to improve, polish, refine, edit, or proofread academic or research writing — including paper drafts, abstracts, introductions, related work sections, methodology descriptions, experiment write-ups, or conclusion sections. Also trigger when users paste LaTeX content and ask for writing help, mention "camera-ready", "rebuttal", "paper revision", or reference any academic venue or conference. This skill handles both full paper refinement and section-by-section editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a technical document explaining how to set up a new server,” you’ll

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

write a (blog post/novel/speech etc)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and update GitHub PR titles and PR bodies with repository templates and local conventions. Use when creating PRs with `gh pr create`, revising PR text, choosing a conventional title prefix (for example `feat(web):`), or ensuring ticket suffix rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A scoring scale for evaluating how well a CLI is designed for AI agents, based on the "Rewrite Your CLI for AI Agents" principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read the branch diff in dynamic-neural-field-composer and print a PR title and description in chat, filling the repo's pull request template. Use when asked to write, draft or suggest a PR title/description, or "what should the PR say".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read the uncommitted diff in dynamic-neural-field-composer and print conventional commit message(s) for it, grouped by logical change. Use when asked to write, suggest or draft a commit message, or "what should I commit this as".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA a change by driving the running dev app like a real QA engineer - start the server and a real browser session, write a checklist from the agreed requirements and the diff, execute every item with evidence, then go looking for anything that looks off even where the diff did not touch. Reports findings by severity and separates regressions from pre-existing problems. Use after a change is implemented and the gates pass, when the user asks to "QA this", "test it in the app", or "check it actually works".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate implementation to Codex, grok, or cursor-agent, then review the diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants Codex, the grok 后端, or cursor-agent to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation to one of those backends, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with an implementation backend doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer runs in the real environment behind backend-specific git and publication boundaries, must not be pointed at a full test suite by default, and its self-report is a claim rather than evidence. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the engineering-mode skill when it is installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate implementation work to a dedicated implementer subagent, then review its diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants a separate model to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with a subagent doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer self-reports success, must not run the full test suite by default, must not touch git, and its report is a claim rather than evidence. Cursor port of implementation-loop. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the cursor-engineering-mode skill (it ships in this same plugin).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Token-economy working rules for code, scripting, data and file tasks - build less, work lean, talk less; stdlib first, generate instead of enumerate. Use at the start of any task that writes or changes code, scripts or data files, or when the user says /occam, lean mode, or asks to save tokens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, analyze, and optimize cold outbound email campaigns on Instantly. Handles end-to-end ICP definition, expert panel scoring (recursive to 90+), sequence copywriting, infrastructure audit, capacity planning, and an implementation/strategy doc for human review. Use when asked to build cold outbound sequences, optimize cold email, audit an outbound motion, write sales sequences, or design cold email campaigns. Supports "start from scratch" and "optimize existing" modes. Execution skill — it produces copy, math, and a doc; it does not auto-send. Requires Instantly for audit/send features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, reviewing, or architecting Rust code — systems programming, async services, CLI tooling, web backends, or any work in `.rs` files. Triggers on editing `.rs` or `Cargo.toml` files, or mentions of "Rust", "Tokio", "Axum", "cargo", "borrow checker", "lifetime", "trait object", "async Rust", "crate", "rustc", or explicit requests to "build this in Rust" / "rewrite X in Rust". For adversarial security review of Rust code see security-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Breaks work into ordered, parallel-dispatchable tasks with an execution DAG. Output format is consumable by CI matrices and parallel agent runners — each task has a stable ID, declared file writes, conflict edges, and branch suffix. Use when you have a spec, brief, or shaper output and need to decompose it into implementable units. Use when a task feels too large, when scope spans multi-repo or multi-week work, or when parallel execution across multiple agents is on the table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-of-session pass that persists durable facts from the CURRENT session into .claude/memory/. Runs IN-SESSION in the main agent (never via Task — a subagent starts cold with no transcript), prompted by the Stop hook's nudge. Triggers on "persist durable facts from this session", "run memory-extraction", "flush session memory", or "extract memory before close". Reads the in-context transcript plus existing memory, applies the durable-fact predicate below, and writes one file per fact plus one MEMORY.md index line — append-or-update, never clobbering a consumer's existing memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures a vague engineering request into a well-scoped task brief before any implementation begins. Use when the user has an engineering goal but the ask is missing which repos are in scope, what "done" means, constraints, or open questions. Triggers on "shape this", "scope this out", "frame this work", "write a brief for", "I want to build" (with unclear scope), or the /shape slash command. Produces a filled task template (multi-repo feature, single-repo change, investigation, or bugfix). Not for already-scoped work — go straight to execution. If the domain is unclear, ask one qualifying question before routing — for marketing intake see marketing-shaper, game-design intake see game-design-shaper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without this discipline, agents ship 60% deliverables and declare closure prematurely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ultra-compressed commit message generator. Cuts noise from commit messages while preserving intent and reasoning. Conventional Commits format. Subject ≤50 chars, body only when "why" isn't obvious. Use when user says "write a commit", "commit message", "generate commit", "/commit", or invokes /caveman-commit. Auto-triggers when staging changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a UGC-style talking-head video ad end to end on the MaxFusion MCP — research the product with user-supplied competitor leads, tear down 5 competitor Meta ads and 5 organic TikToks, write a pain-driven script that sounds like a person talking (never like an ad), reverse-prompt a rights-clean photoreal actor from a user-supplied reference photo, generate two chained 10-second Gemini Omni clips that play as one continuous take, and ship a single seamless 9:16 MP4. Use whenever the user wants a UGC ad, a talking-head ad, an ad for an app or product, mentions Omni or Gemini Omni Flash, drops an actor photo and asks for a video ad, or says anything like "make me some UGC", "let's make ads for X", or "another variation". Built for Claude Code (local ffmpeg); degrades to Claude app with documented fallbacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or update dygo instructions, reference documentation, task descriptions, CLI help, metadata examples, or architecture notes. Use when documentation quality and contract accuracy are central to the task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, or review security-sensitive dygo behavior across auth, sessions, Permissions, secrets, APIs, database writes, files, Jobs, and Studio. Use when security boundaries are a primary concern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。