「analyze」の検索結果

Build AI cohort analysis systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-cohort-analyzer related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI contract analysis systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-contract-analyzer related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI call analysis systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-call-analyzer related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI marketing attribution systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-attribution-analyzer related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user needs to analyze a Cyclr export, parse Cyclr JSON files, migrate from Cyclr to Prismatic, convert Cyclr cycles to CNI flows, map Cyclr steps to Prismatic equivalents, or interpret Cyclr connector settings, field mappings, and cycle parameters. Relevant when the user says "analyze Cyclr export", "migrate from Cyclr", "parse Cyclr JSON", "convert Cyclr cycle to Prismatic", or "what does this Cyclr step map to".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user needs to analyze a Dell Boomi export, parse Boomi Component XML files, migrate from Boomi to Prismatic, convert Boomi processes to CNI flows, map Boomi shapes to Prismatic equivalents, or interpret Boomi connector settings, transform maps, and process properties. Relevant when the user says "analyze this Boomi export", "migrate from Boomi", "parse Boomi XML", "convert Boomi process to Prismatic", or "what does this Boomi shape map to".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A two-phase repair skill that analyzes errors and suggests fixes before executing repairs. Phase one: user describes error, agent analyzes and proposes solution. Phase two: upon approval, executes the repair action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze context and decide on continuation via Stop hook. Use when determining if work should continue, analyzing completion status, making continuation decisions, or implementing the Two-Claude pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect and analyze public X posts from keywords, hashtags, OR queries, domains, or known post URLs, then trace them to primary sources, official docs, GitHub repos, benchmarks, and reusable images. Use for launch-day reactions to a new model or product, event hashtags, keynote coverage, new-technology use cases, popularity research, or turning noisy X posts into a source-backed research note. Triggers: X で調べて, X の反応, ハッシュタグ調査, キーワードで X 検索, X 投稿からネタ探し. Not for posting or account operations on X.

Analyze historical VS Code GitHub Copilot Chat sessions by model, reasoning effort, AIU, time, reliability, workflow behavior, and external quality evidence, or safely prune workspace-scoped local chat history by age. Use for session analysis, repeated-task retrospectives, model evaluation, cost/performance analysis, and old session cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Institutional Theory (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983) to analyze how coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphic pressures shape organizational structures and practices. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why organizations in the same field look alike, evaluate whether a practice was adopted for legitimacy vs efficiency, analyze regulatory or social pressures on strategy, or when they ask 'why do all firms in this industry do the same thing', 'is this best practice or just conformity', or 'how do regulations shape our structure'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Giddens' structuration theory to analyze the duality of structure — how social structures are both the medium and outcome of the practices they organize. Use this skill when the user needs to bridge agency and structure in organizational or social analysis, explain how routines reproduce or transform institutional patterns, analyze the recursive relationship between action and structure, or when they ask 'do people shape institutions or do institutions shape people', 'how are these routines maintained', or 'where does change come from if structures constrain action'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply organizational ecology (Hannan and Freeman) to analyze population-level dynamics of organizational founding, failure, and selection. Use this skill when the user needs to explain industry-level patterns of birth and death rates, analyze structural inertia and liabilities of newness or aging, evaluate why adaptation is rare relative to selection, or when they ask 'why do most startups fail', 'why is this industry dominated by old firms', or 'why do organizations resist change despite environmental pressure'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Bourdieu's field theory to analyze power relations through the interplay of field, capital, and habitus. Use this skill when the user needs to map positions and position-takings within a social field, analyze how different forms of capital (economic, cultural, social, symbolic) structure competition, explain why actors behave as they do within institutional settings, or when they ask 'why do people in this industry act this way', 'who has power and why', or 'how does this field reproduce inequality'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Weick's sensemaking theory to analyze how individuals and organizations construct meaning from ambiguous situations. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze organizational responses to crises, understand how interpretive frames shape action, diagnose breakdowns in collective understanding, or when they ask 'how did they interpret this situation', 'why did the organization fail to see the warning signs', or 'how do people make sense of disruption'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply narrative research methods to understand human experience through stories, analyzing narrative structure, temporality, and meaning-making in life stories and oral histories. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze how people construct meaning through storytelling, examine narrative structure and plot, conduct life story or oral history research, or when they ask 'how do stories shape identity', 'how do I analyze a life narrative', or 'what does this story reveal about experience'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply signaling theory (Spence, 1973) to analyze how agents communicate private information through costly, credible signals under information asymmetry. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate whether a corporate action serves as a credible signal, analyze dividend or IPO signaling, assess separating vs pooling equilibria, or when they ask 'why do firms pay dividends', 'is this signal credible', or 'how does underpricing signal quality'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Kingdon's multiple streams framework to analyze how problems, policies, and politics converge to open policy windows. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why certain policies get adopted while others don't, identify policy windows and entrepreneurial opportunities, or analyze the agenda-setting process in public policy — even if they say 'why did this policy pass now', 'policy window', or 'how do issues get on the agenda'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Granovetter's embeddedness theory to analyze how economic behavior is embedded in ongoing social relations, avoiding both over-socialized and under-socialized accounts. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why market transactions deviate from pure economic rationality, analyze how trust and social ties shape business dealings, evaluate structural vs relational embeddedness in inter-firm networks, or when they ask 'why do firms prefer existing partners over cheaper alternatives', 'how do social relationships shape economic outcomes', or 'is this market truly arms-length'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply governance theory to analyze multi-level, network, and collaborative governance arrangements beyond traditional government. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate public-private partnerships, analyze multi-stakeholder governance structures, compare governance models across sectors, or assess institutional arrangements for collective decision-making — even if they say 'who governs this', 'public-private collaboration', or 'how are decisions made across organizations'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Kuhn's paradigm theory to analyze scientific progress through the cycle of normal science, anomalies, crisis, and revolution. Use this skill when the user needs to understand why a field resists change, trace paradigm shifts in a discipline, analyze incommensurability between competing frameworks, or when they ask 'why do scientists ignore contradictory evidence', 'how do scientific revolutions happen', or 'why can't proponents of different paradigms agree'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Consumer Culture Theory to analyze consumption as a cultural practice shaped by identity, marketplace cultures, and ideology. Use this skill when the user needs to interpret consumer behavior through cultural lenses, analyze brand communities or subcultures of consumption, decode marketplace ideologies, or when they ask 'why do consumers behave this way culturally', 'what does this consumption mean', or 'how does identity shape buying'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Complex Adaptive Systems theory to analyze phenomena exhibiting emergence, self-organization, co-evolution, and edge-of-chaos dynamics. Use this skill when the user needs to understand why a system behaves unpredictably despite known components, model agent-based interactions that produce emergent outcomes, analyze fitness landscapes, or when they ask 'why does this system behave in ways no one designed', 'how do local interactions create global patterns', or 'why do small changes sometimes cause massive system shifts'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Affordance Theory (Gibson, 1979; Norman, 1988) to analyze the action possibilities that an artifact provides to an actor. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate technology design from an affordance perspective, identify why users struggle with an interface, analyze IT-enabled organizational change through affordance actualization, or when they ask 'what does this technology afford', 'why can't users figure out this feature', or 'how does technology enable new practices'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。