「approval」の検索結果

Provider-independent asset continuity and version management for generated-media production. Use when an agent must track generated or reference assets, prompts, seeds, model/tool versions, manifests, approvals, edit decisions, derivatives, localization variants, metadata/provenance, and continuity QA across image, video, audio, avatar, product-ad, social, explainer, or film-style pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent ecommerce product imagery production for marketplace listings, product pages, hero shots, lifestyle scenes, comparison charts, infographics, variant/packaging images, virtual try-on or placement mockups, ads, and AI-assisted product visuals. Use when an agent must plan, generate, edit, review, localize, package, or QA truthful commercial product images while managing SKU continuity, marketplace requirements, claims, rights, releases, accessibility, and approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent workflow for producing SaaS and software product demo videos, including app walkthroughs, feature launches, sales demos, onboarding clips, help-center explainers, website hero demos, and PLG assets. Use when an agent must plan, script, capture, synthesize, edit, localize, review, or QA privacy-safe software demo videos with substantiated claims, accessible captions, screen/cursor direction, CTA variants, and stakeholder approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent production workflow for AI avatar spokesperson videos, including presenter briefs, consent and likeness rights, disclosure and platform labeling, casting, localization, performance direction, brand fit, claims review, lip-sync/audio QA, accessibility, approvals, and delivery packages. Use when creating synthetic presenter videos, corporate explainers, training modules, sales/support avatars, localization spokespeople, product announcements, compliance videos, or social avatar clips.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply DDD tactical patterns when working with domain code, and validate proposed domain models before approval (design mode). Enforces aggregate design, value objects over primitives, entity identity rules, and bounded context boundaries. Use when creating or modifying domain models, designing aggregates, working in the domain layer, or when the user mentions 'domain', 'aggregate', 'value object', 'entity', 'bounded context', or 'DDD'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce architectural rules when generating or modifying code, and validate proposed designs before approval (design mode). Defaults to clean architecture; supports any architecture style via the architecture-refiner. Validates layer responsibilities, dependency direction, and structural constraints using the loaded architecture rules. Use when generating code, reviewing architecture, creating new files, or when the user mentions 'architecture', 'layers', 'structure', 'dependency rules', 'hexagonal architecture', 'ports and adapters', 'modular monolith', or 'onion architecture'. Also use when reviewing generated code for structural compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a 60–90 second, collage-style HyperFrames explainer from a hiding-in-plain-sight topic or supplied documents and links. Use for requests such as 'make a plain-sight explainer', 'Vox-style history of X', 'why is X everywhere?', or 'turn this document into an explainer'. Covers topic or source routing, research, script, static design approval, voiceover timing, motion continuity, build, and numeric quality gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI SDK for Python (the `ai` package). Use for Python model calls (LLMs, image, video, speech, embedding, transcription, reranking, or evaluation), agents, model interaction tests, tool calling, subagents, approvals, durable execution, telemetry, AI SDK UI backends, and custom providers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collaboratively design, implement, review, and refine software features with a human developer using an iterative pair programming workflow. Prioritize understanding, explicit approval, small reviewable changes, and synchronized specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up HOL Guard, protecting local AI harnesses, reviewing Guard approvals or receipts, or scanning agent plugins, skills, MCP servers, and marketplace packages before use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement visual regression testing with Playwright screenshots, Chromatic, Percy, and Argos CI. Covers baseline management, diff threshold tuning, dynamic content masking, responsive viewport testing, and review/approval workflows. Use when: "visual test," "screenshot," "visual regression," "pixel diff," "snapshot diff," "update baselines," "Chromatic," "percy snapshot," "argos screenshot." Not for: bulk baseline regeneration after a redesign broke many tests — use selector-drift-recovery; cross-browser rendering matrices — use cross-browser-testing; general Playwright test structure — use playwright-automation. Related: playwright-automation, ci-cd-integration, cross-browser-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take a plan all the way to a ready-to-merge pull request — review the plan (scaled to risk), implement it test-first, code-review and fix, run the CI gate, open the PR, and watch it green. Use after you have an approved plan (from plan mode, or the Plan agent); pass `issue <n>` to deliver a specific GitHub issue you name, or `next` to take the top startable issue off the project board's Ready column — either way it re-verifies, claims and plans the issue first. Invoking it with a plan already in hand is itself plan approval — it then runs autonomously to a single hard stop: ready-to-merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cut a new TMDb release — work out the next SemVer version from the evidence, do the pre-tag housekeeping a tag would otherwise freeze in place, draft release notes, then tag and publish the GitHub release. Presents the version (with its reasoning) and the full notes for approval and STOPS; nothing is tagged or published until you say go.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a full implementation verification pass after code or data changes. Use when the user asks to verify, QA, smoke test, run checks, validate a feature, inspect a local app in the browser, capture screenshots, or turn discovered QA issues into regression tests/checklists with user approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CopilotKit is an open-source framework for putting AI agents inside React apps: a chat sidebar or popup, tools the agent can call in the browser or on the server, app state shared with the agent, and human-in-the-loop approvals. Use when a user asks to add an AI assistant or chat sidebar to a React or Next.js app, let an agent read app state or trigger UI actions, connect a LangGraph or other AG-UI agent to a frontend, or migrate CopilotKit v1 code (useCopilotAction, useCopilotReadable, OpenAIAdapter) to the v2 API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert in Cline, the autonomous AI coding agent for VS Code that can read files, write code, run terminal commands, and use the browser — with human-in-the-loop approval at each step. You help developers use Cline for complex multi-file refactoring, feature implementation, debugging, and codebase exploration where the AI plans and executes while the developer reviews and approves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AG2 (formerly AutoGen) is an open-source Python framework for building AI agents and multi-agent systems that use tools, human approval and structured conversations. Use it when you need agents that call functions, collaborate in a group chat, execute code, or when you are migrating AutoGen or pyautogen code to AG2 v1 or ag2-classic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The systematic discipline of reviewing AI-generated and human-written marketing content for quality, accuracy, consistency, and effectiveness. This isn't proofreading—it's strategic quality control that catches issues before they damage brand, waste spend, or miss opportunities. In an era where AI can generate content at scale, QA becomes the bottleneck— and the moat. Speed without quality is just fast failure. Every piece of content is a brand promise, and QA ensures that promise is kept. Content QA operates at multiple levels: tactical (spelling, grammar), strategic (message alignment), technical (platform compliance), and brand (voice, tone). The best QA catches what the creator couldn't see because they were too close. Use when "review content, QA, quality check, proofread, check copy, content review, brand compliance, verify content, fact check, review before publish, content approval, final review, qa, content-review, quality-assurance, brand-compliance, proofreading, content-quality, review" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keeps specification documents and code in agreement. Audit mode finds every divergence when an implementation is claimed complete; sync mode detects spec drift in staged changes and updates the spec after user approval, so each commit is a reconciled snapshot of spec, tests, and code. Use when an implementation is claimed complete against a spec, before committing changes that may drift from the spec, or after approving decisions that must flow back into it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an opt-in deep codebase audit with persisted findings. Confirm cost before dispatch; filing and telemetry need separate approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an opt-in deep codebase audit with persisted findings. Confirm cost before dispatch; filing and telemetry need separate approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The spec-to-plan bridge. /feature supplies an approved spec; initial full-lane HTML sprint review may supply a ready draft only through draft_for_pair. Creates the same-format plan with exact paths, tests, dependencies and complete criterion coverage. The initial paired review has no execution authority until one real user reply approves both artifacts. Ordinary sequential planning retains approved-source binding and plan approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Socratic spec-refinement front of /feature, and the planning front of /sprint. Routed to BEFORE any code — it turns a one-line idea into a concrete spec with testable criteria, ready for initial combined sprint review or explicit sequential approval. Five gated phases — frame, shape, refine, write, review-and-approve. No implementation before an approved spec; the caller retains required planning, execution and delivery ordering. Each acceptance criterion becomes one tdd Phase 1 obligation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the work starts from `site-analysis.json` and the user wants page-group authoring, grouping adjustments, or page-group approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。