「check」の検索結果

Health check for the bb/pt/ctf workflow driver subsystem - verifies everything is in place so every machine runs the same. Checks vault-content consistency (scripts present, JSON valid, routing wired, all 69 tool pages carry phase:, the tool index resolves, the hook edits are in place) AND per-machine wiring (the three workflow skills symlinked, hooks registered, imports work), then runs a live init->board->next smoke test. Use when setting up the workflow on a new machine, after a vault sync, when the driver misbehaves, or on "bb-health", "campaign health", "is the workflow set up", "check hooks and scripts", "why is the board not working".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handles GDPR Art. 10 criminal conviction and offence data classification including official authority requirements, national law derogations, and comprehensive register restrictions. Covers controller obligations for criminal background checks and offence records. Keywords: criminal data, Art 10, conviction data, offence records, criminal background, DBS check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Educator morning course health check for Canvas LMS. Shows submission rates, struggling students, grade distribution, and upcoming deadlines. Trigger phrases include "morning check", "course status", "how are my students", or any start-of-day teaching review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a skill is brittle, drifting, repeatedly failing, or needs a Reliable Skill Contract. Trigger for phrases like skill lifeguard, reliable skill, self-maintaining skill, negative examples, verification checkpoints, drift signals, replay hooks, or failure log to skill patch. Audits or patches skills so high-value workflows include explicit forbidden behaviors, checkpoints, machine-checkable done conditions, replay or smoke hooks, and drift detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies factual claims in documents using web search and official sources, then proposes corrections with user confirmation. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify information, validate claims, check accuracy, or update outdated information in documents. Supports AI model specs, technical documentation, statistics, and general factual statements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit web pages for accessibility issues, WCAG compliance, and screen reader compatibility. Trigger when the user asks to: check accessibility, run an a11y audit, test WCAG compliance, check screen reader support, audit ARIA attributes, verify keyboard navigation, find accessibility issues, or check for missing alt text or labels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

2Checkout integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with 2Checkout data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run before pushing a PR that touched UI to find untranslated keys in any of the 21 non-English locales and to catch user-visible English strings that bypass context.l10n. Reports findings as a checklist; refuses to declare clean until all are addressed or explicitly waived. Invoke with /check-l10n.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether a new version of a repository preserves the behavior observed by tests on the old version. Use this skill when comparing two versions of code to detect regressions, verify refactoring safety, validate bug fixes don't break existing functionality, or ensure backward compatibility. Detects differences in function outputs, exceptions, observable states, and performance between versions. Generates reports highlighting potential regressions (critical, high, medium, low severity), improvements, and areas requiring verification. Triggers when users ask to check for regressions between versions, compare test behavior across versions, verify behavior preservation, or validate that changes don't break existing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair code violations of temporal properties using model-checking counterexamples as guidance. Use when working with formal verification results, temporal logic property violations (LTL, CTL), model checking counterexamples, or when asked to repair property violations, fix counterexamples, repair temporal properties, fix model checking violations, or repair code based on counterexamples. Applicable to concurrent systems, state machines, synchronization issues, safety/liveness properties, and resource management violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes code to identify security-critical time intervals and timing vulnerabilities in authentication, authorization, and time-sensitive security operations. Use this skill when reviewing code for proper timeout enforcement, token expiration, session management, rate limiting, password reset validity, or any time-sensitive security mechanism. Detects missing expiration checks, excessive timeout values, lack of rate limiting, client-side only validation, hardcoded timeouts, and timing attack vulnerabilities. Triggers when users ask to check security timeouts, verify token expiration handling, audit session timeout implementation, review rate limiting, or analyze time-based security controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify an open factory PR before human review - re-runs gates, checks the test proves the fix, checks scope and test tampering. Use when reviewing a factory PR, running the PR review routine, or asked to independently check a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Health check endpoints for liveness, readiness, dependency monitoring. Use for Kubernetes, load balancers, auto-scaling, or encountering probe failures, startup delays, dependency checks, timeout configuration errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when operating, debugging, deploying, or monitoring a Telegram bot or Telegram-to-agent gateway. Triggers on "telegram bot down", "bot not responding", "debug bot", "check webhook", "polling vs webhook", "restart bot", "deploy bot", "bot logs", "agent gateway", "Telegram Bot API error", "send test message", "бот не отвечает", "проверь бота", "логи бота", "перезапусти бота". Covers health checks, logs, webhook/polling diagnostics, environment validation, safe restart/deploy checklists, Bot API smoke tests, forum topic delivery, privacy mode, gateway routing, and incident notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review grammar check deliverables with audience, evidence, voice, and conversion-quality controls. Use when the user explicitly asks for grammar check work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect contamination and assess genome quality using CheckM, CheckM2, GTDB-Tk, and GUNC for metagenome-assembled genomes and isolate assemblies. Use when checking assemblies for contamination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a structured code review by composing validation checklists from relevant atoms based on what code changed. Loads atoms conditionally -- clean-code always, architecture/DDD/security/tests only when the delta touches their domain. Produces a severity-ordered report with specific locations and fixes. Use when the user asks to 'review this', 'code review', 'quality check', 'validate the code', 'check my code', 'review the delta', or 'review this PR'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test payment and checkout flows end to end against PSP sandboxes — Stripe first, with the general pattern for Adyen/Braintree/PayPal. Covers Stripe test-mode card numbers and their decline codes, the 3DS/SCA challenge flow and its nested-iframe handling in Playwright, test clocks for subscription/billing-cycle simulation, webhook testing (stripe listen/trigger, signature verification, idempotency), failed/retried payments and refunds, and never using real cards. Use when: "test Stripe checkout," "payment test," "3DS test," "test webhook signature," "test subscription renewal," "test clock," "refund test," "decline card test," "checkout E2E." Not for: General API contract testing of non-payment endpoints — api-testing. PCI-DSS/regulatory compliance audit — compliance-testing. Related: api-testing, playwright-automation, compliance-testing, test-data-management, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate data quality in CSV, JSON, and database exports by checking for missing values, type mismatches, duplicates, outliers, and schema violations. Use when building ETL pipelines, auditing data imports, checking data freshness, or ensuring data contracts between teams. Trigger words: data quality, validation, null values, duplicates, schema check, data contract, ETL, pipeline, data drift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Checkov, the static analysis tool for infrastructure-as-code that scans Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, Helm, Dockerfile, and ARM templates for security misconfigurations and compliance violations. Helps developers integrate Checkov into CI/CD pipelines and write custom policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The systematic discipline of reviewing AI-generated and human-written marketing content for quality, accuracy, consistency, and effectiveness. This isn't proofreading—it's strategic quality control that catches issues before they damage brand, waste spend, or miss opportunities. In an era where AI can generate content at scale, QA becomes the bottleneck— and the moat. Speed without quality is just fast failure. Every piece of content is a brand promise, and QA ensures that promise is kept. Content QA operates at multiple levels: tactical (spelling, grammar), strategic (message alignment), technical (platform compliance), and brand (voice, tone). The best QA catches what the creator couldn't see because they were too close. Use when "review content, QA, quality check, proofread, check copy, content review, brand compliance, verify content, fact check, review before publish, content approval, final review, qa, content-review, quality-assurance, brand-compliance, proofreading, content-quality, review" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checkable-ish surface presentation signals a reviewer notices first — duplicate/near-identical tables, leftover pipeline/template strings, too-few or LLM-looking figures, and page-padding. AUXILIARY ONLY and weak by design: a deterministic pass (tools/check_presentation.py — dup-table + pipeline-artifact) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass (thin-float, LLM-figure, page-padding), every above-info finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json). The adjudicator CAPS everything at minor (SURFACE_ONLY_SKILLS + SURFACE_PATTERNS) — these contribute at most SOFT_FLAGS, never a HARD verdict — default false_positive_risk:high. NOTE: the pure AI writing-STYLE impressions (AI-flavor prose, defensive 'not-X-but-Y' hedging, narrative-arc, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames) MOVED to the zero-verdict-weight AIS track — for those use skills/ai-style-impressions, NOT this. Emits presentation-signals.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "presentation signals", "surface check", "duplicate tables", "排版信号".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any SDK documentation site and produces a fully scored, downloadable HTML report. Use this skill whenever a user provides a documentation URL and asks to audit, review, analyse, score, or check the quality of SDK docs. Also trigger for phrases like "audit the SDK docs at X", "check if the docs at X are complete", "review this SDK documentation", "how good are these docs", "run an SDK audit on X", or any time a user pastes a URL alongside words like audit, review, crawl, check, analyse, quality, completeness, or gaps. ALWAYS use this skill — do not attempt the audit without following this structured crawl → analyse → cross-reference → report workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a directory of multilingual blog content for completeness, consistency, hreflang correctness, meta-tag parity, and freshness. Builds a translation coverage matrix, flags stale translations, validates hreflang and schema, and emits a prioritized report with runnable fix commands. Use when user says "locale audit", "blog locale-audit", "check translations", "multilingual audit", "translation check", "hreflang check", "Uebersetzungen pruefen".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。