「citations」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "analyze competitors" or "竞品分析"; benchmarks competitor keywords, content, backlinks, AI citations, and traffic share into strengths, weaknesses, and an action plan. Not for a pairwise topic-coverage gap map — use content-gap-analysis. 竞品分析/竞争对手

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive slices from specs, order by dependencies, write acceptance criteria with citations, and finalize phase/progress artifacts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Tavily's multi-source research workflow for comparisons, market analysis, literature-oriented exploration, or detailed cited reports. Use only when bounded search and extraction are insufficient.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs, asks about Codex itself or choosing Codex surfaces, needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, latest/current/default-model prompting guidance, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; use OpenAI docs MCP tools for non-Codex docs questions, use the Codex manual helper first for broad Codex self-knowledge, and restrict fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review final-assignment materials for requirements, citations, AI-use disclosure, and data-analysis completeness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This is the core skill for the deep research and writing tool—combining AI-driven deep research with well-formatted written outputs. Every document produced is backed by comprehensive literature search and verified citations through the research-lookup skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps an AI assistant write, structure, and edit articles in the encyclopedic style of Wikipedia — neutral tone, lead section, summary style, inline citations, no peacock/weasel/persuasive language, and the stub→FA quality ladder. Also covers Simple English Wikipedia rules. MADE BY SQERSTERS

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize content for AI search and LLM citations across AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and similar systems. Use when improving AI visibility, answer engine optimization, or citation readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS use this skill whenever you would otherwise ask the user a question in free-form chat -- for clarifications, confirmations (especially destructive actions), missing parameters, multiple-choice decisions, or structured form input. Elicitations are routed through the Unique AI Platform UI via `unique-cli elicit create` + `elicit wait` (the default polling pattern) or a single supervised `unique-cli elicit ask` call (only when your agent instructions say your environment supervises the wait) so the user gets a proper structured prompt and you get a structured answer back. Do NOT ask the user in plain chat when you can use this skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO + GEO (AI-search) + brand-entity desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) — wired to Google Search Console for a dashboard over search analytics and an agent-prepared SEO opportunities review queue, plus an AI-visibility tracker (are we cited in ChatGPT / Perplexity / Gemini / Claude / Copilot answers), a GEO content-optimization queue gated by geo-qa, and an entity / knowledge-panel readiness checklist. Use when the user invokes $kelly-seo or /kelly-seo, mentions SEO, Google Search Console, GSC, search analytics, search performance, queries, keywords, rankings, positions, impressions, clicks, CTR, striking-distance queries, title/meta rewrites, content briefs, internal links, SEO opportunities review, GEO, generative engine optimization, AI search, AI visibility, being cited by AI answer engines, ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini/Claude/Copilot citations, brand entity, knowledge panel, Wikidata, schema.org, or entity readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legal precedent App-in-Skill (Busabase-backed) desk for internal casebase search, local court-pattern analysis, similar-case packs, citations, and approval-gated research exports. Use when the user invokes $kelly-legal-precedent-desk, mentions 类案检索, 本地裁判尺度, 内部案例库查询, 案例查阅与收藏, precedent research, similar cases, legal research pack, or wants a Busabase-backed desk where lawyers review agent-prepared precedent findings before reuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches across your Notion workspace, synthesizes findings from multiple pages, and creates comprehensive research documentation saved as new Notion pages. Turns scattered information into structured reports with proper citations and actionable insights.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep literature review — PubMed, EuropePMC, bioRxiv preprints, citation networks, evidence synthesis. Disambiguates queries, runs collision-aware searches, grades evidence T1-T4, and produces structured reports. Use for systematic literature review, meta-analysis evidence collection, and detailed answer-with-citations workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find external documentation, web sources, or remote code with citations. Local code navigation uses the configured code tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fresh adversarial code review with binary PASS/FAIL verdicts, evidence citations, and anchoring bias prevention via fresh reviewer spawning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects content similarity, verifies standardized citations and abbreviations, and flags potential academic integrity risks; use it before submission, during academic writing QA, or for compliance reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates high-quality content (blog posts, tweets, newsletters, documentation) that matches the user's writing style and voice. Performs web research to find citations and supporting evidence. Use when user requests blog posts, marketing content, newsletters, tweets, or any written content that should sound authentic and be well-researched.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize content for AI search and LLM citations across AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and similar systems. Use when improving AI visibility, answer engine optimization, or citation readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a code review of an explicit range or set of files — correctness, security, performance, conventions, tests — with stable findings (CR-nnn, BLOCKER..INFO) and rule citations — 'revisar os últimos commits', 'code review da feature X', 'review base..HEAD'. Plans a REPORT-mode review (no code changes, no commit). Do NOT use to fix code (feat-feature / feat-quick), to write tests (feat-test) or for UI/UX design critique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research topics thoroughly and write comprehensive, well-structured content including articles, documentation, blog posts, and technical writing with proper citations and sources. Use when writing blog posts, creating technical articles, researching topics, gathering sources, writing documentation, creating educational content, or producing research-backed content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' or 'optimize for Claude/Gemini.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide advisory guidance for the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and related HTTPD configuration in AEMaaCS cloud workflows only, with public-doc citations and cloud-specific MCP verification plans. Use for conceptual questions such as `statfileslevel`, filter rules, URL decomposition, cache invalidation behavior, rewrite behavior, and security headers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research across Notion and synthesize into structured documentation; use when gathering info from multiple Notion sources to produce briefs, comparisons, or reports with citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。