1,186 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Synchronize and verify code examples in documentation. Use when function signatures change, API interfaces update, imports shift, or documentation snippets become outdated and need correction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When asynchronously reviewing peer code before merging into the main branch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive fullstack development skill for building complete web applications with React, Next.js, Node.js, GraphQL, and PostgreSQL. Includes project scaffolding, code quality analysis, architecture patterns, and complete tech stack guidance. Use when building new projects, analyzing code quality, implementing design patterns, or setting up development workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bu skill covers integrating Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools—CodeQL and Semgrep—into GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelines. It addresses configuring automated code scanning on pull requests and pushes, tuning rules to reduce false positives, uploading SARIF results to GitHub Advanced Security, and establishing quality gates that block merges when high-severity vulnerabilities are Detected.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert code reviewer specializing in code quality, security vulnerabilities, and best practices across multiple languages. Masters static analysis, design patterns, and performance optimization with focus on maintainability and technical debt reduction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a GitHub pull request from multiple perspectives in parallel, output only findings, then let the user pick which to fix in the same session. Use when the user asks to review a PR by number, mentions "PRレビュー" / "PR review" with a number, or invokes `/pr-review <number>`. Fans out subagents for absolute-rules, stop-slop, security, architecture, code-quality, testing, and ai-antipattern.
Code review checklist for SwiftUI and Swift PRs. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, verifying Swift/SwiftUI implementations, or conducting PR reviews. Provides prioritized checklist covering state management, performance, component design, data flow, async handling, UI/UX, accessibility, security, and testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-commit verification pipeline — static security scan, baseline-aware quality gates, independent reviewer subagent, and auto-fix loop. Use after code changes and before committing, pushing, or opening a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply continuous improvement principles to iteratively enhance processes, code quality, team practices, and system performance through small, incremental changes. Use when improving development processes, optimizing workflows, reducing waste, enhancing code quality over time, implementing retrospective learnings, or fostering a culture of continuous improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for AEM Edge Delivery Services projects. Use at the end of development (before PR) for self-review, or to review pull requests. Validates code quality, performance, accessibility, and adherence to EDS best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality assurance review for implementations. Use when reviewing code quality, checking implementation standards, performing QA cycles, or validating feature quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-powered fixes on every file edit via hooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes production-quality Pine Script v6 code following TradingView guidelines and best practices. Use when implementing indicators, strategies, or any Pine Script code. Triggers on requests to create, write, implement, or code Pine Script functionality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technology-agnostic prompt generator that creates customizable AI prompts for scanning codebases and identifying high-quality code exemplars. Supports multiple programming languages (.NET, Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, React, Angular, Python) with configurable analysis depth, categorization methods, and documentation formats to establish coding standards and maintain consistency across development teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-commit review: security scan, quality gates, auto-fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for AEM Edge Delivery Services projects. Use at the end of development (before PR) for self-review, or to review pull requests. Validates code quality, performance, accessibility, and adherence to EDS best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct one bounded evidence-grounded code review when the user explicitly requests review or ROSE names a concrete unresolved correctness/quality risk; do not trigger automatically after implementation, before every merge, for every bug fix/refactor, or as a completion gate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive quality verification: spec compliance, lint, type-check, tests, cross-layer data flow, code reuse, and consistency checks. Use when code is written and needs quality verification, before committing changes, or to catch context drift during long sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
変数や関数の命名、読みやすさ、データの更新方法、エラー処理を共通の基準で見直します。新規開発やコードレビューで、保守しやすい書き方をそろえるスキル。
公開前の文章やコードを二つの独立したエージェントが同じ基準で審査し、両方の合格まで修正と再審査を繰り返し、上限を超えたら人へ判断を引き継ぐスキル。
Djangoの公開や変更提案の前に、環境・コード品質・データベース変更・テスト・脆弱性・設定を順に検証し、段階別の合否と修正すべき問題をレポートにまとめます。