「code-review」の検索結果

Review a pull request end-to-end using GitHub CLI. Covers diff analysis, commit history review, CI/CD check verification, severity-leveled feedback (blocking/suggestion/nit/praise), and gh pr review submission. Use when a pull request is assigned for review, performing a self-review before requesting others' input, conducting a second review after feedback is addressed, or auditing a merged PR for post-merge quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a GitHub Copilot (or any bot reviewer) pull-request review to a clean pass without babysitting it: fix each finding in its own commit, reply to the review thread with the fix sha, resolve the thread, re-request the bot, and poll for the async re-review. Covers the thread node-id (PRRT_...) vs comment databaseId distinction, the resolveReviewThread GraphQL mutation, the copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] slug, and how to read the bot's verdict (COMMENTED plus a "human review recommended" banner is not a blocking finding). Use when Copilot has left review comments on your PR, when bot review threads must be closed out with an auditable fix-reply-resolve trail before merge, or when you need to verify that a re-review actually landed on the new HEAD rather than the old one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a structured cross-project code review between two Claude Code instances via the cross-review-mcp broker. Each agent reads its own codebase, reviews the peer's code, and engages in evidence-backed dialogue — with QSG scaling laws enforcing review quality through minimum bandwidth constraints and phase-gated progression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage pull requests using GitHub CLI. Covers branch preparation, writing PR titles and descriptions, creating PRs, handling review feedback, and merge/cleanup workflows. Use when proposing changes from a feature or fix branch for review, merging completed work into the main branch, requesting code review from collaborators, or documenting the purpose and scope of a set of changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, bugs, and improvements. Use when user wants code review or quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a change before committing: security, tests, independent review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a pull request and leave inline comments on GitHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kbo-cli 의 작업 브랜치에서 develop 으로 향하는 새 PR 을 만든다. 단순 push+gh pr create 가 아니라, /code-review 로 diff 검토 → biome check (format+lint) → tsc typecheck → bun build → bun test 5단계 검증을 통과시킨 뒤에 PR 을 올린다. PR 제목·본문은 모두 한국어 Angular 컨벤션 (CLAUDE.md 참조). 사용자가 "PR 올려줘", "pull request 만들어줘", "PR 생성해줘", "이거 PR 로 정리해줘", "리뷰 받게 올려줘" 같은 PR 생성 의도를 보이거나, 기능 작업이 끝나서 머지 흐름을 시작하려는 맥락이면 반드시 이 스킬을 쓴다. push 만 하고 끝나는 단순 push 요청과 다르다 — push 직전에 검증을 강제하는 게 핵심이다.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight build: explore → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Verifies build + tests, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default for everyday features; reach for /build only when the work needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /claude-setup:refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight build: explore → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Verifies build + tests, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default for everyday features; reach for /claude-setup:build only when the work needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug pipeline: investigates a bug, diagnoses root cause, writes failing tests, implements fix via TDD, and reviews the result. Orchestrates bug-investigator -> bug-fixer -> code-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactoring pipeline: analyzes a target file or directory for code quality issues, plans safe incremental improvements, optionally writes tests first as a safety net, implements the changes, and reviews the result. Orchestrates refactor-planner → (test-writer) → parallel-task-orchestrator → code-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REQUIRED before declaring a task done when the diff touches user input, SQL, shell, auth, credentials, file paths, serialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependency surface. Judge by that surface, not the task label — research/experimental/local-only code with none of it can skip this. Walks OWASP/ASVS/MITRE questions the compiler and the test suite won't catch. Pair with `rafter run` on the same diff. When the diff has that surface, marking it complete without both has been under-delivered — do not claim done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

代码审查师（科迪 Cody）——专注于从安全性、性能、正确性和可维护性四个维度对代码变更进行结构化审查，输出安全漏洞、性能问题、正确性缺陷和可维护性隐患的详细报告。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive code review checklist and methodology. Use when reviewing PRs, conducting code audits, or assessing code quality. Keywords: review, PR, code review, audit, assess, quality, check

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take one new feature slice from idea to reviewed, committed code in a single guided pass — scope it into the smallest shippable slice, build it test-first with strict TDD, review and fix the diff, then commit it. Chains slice → test-driven-development → the built-in /code-review → git-commit. Not for reviewing an existing PR, upgrades, or open-ended design questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。