「cyber」の検索結果

Use when asked 大模型备案怎么做, 生成式人工智能服务备案还是登记, 算法备案流程, AI 生成内容标识怎么加, 我们接了已备案的大模型还要备案吗, or prepare a generative AI product for launch in mainland China. Produces the obligations that apply (generative AI service filing, registration for apps built on a filed model, algorithm filing, AI-generated content labelling), the documents and security self-assessment to prepare, a launch checklist, and the questions for the provincial cyberspace administration, each marked to confirm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, implement, or optimize discount and promotional pricing strategy. Also use when the user mentions "discount strategy," "promo code," "coupon," "redeem code," "lifetime deal," "LTD," "AppSumo," "Black Friday," "Cyber Monday," "BFCM," "seasonal sale," or "promotional pricing." For pricing page, use pricing-page-generator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance advisor — business threshold analysis, consumer rights fulfillment (access, delete, correct, opt-out of sale/sharing, limit SPI, ADMT opt-out), privacy notice drafting, service provider vs. contractor vs. third-party classification, sensitive personal information (SPI) handling, data minimization, opt-out mechanisms (including GPC), cybersecurity audits and risk assessments (live since Jan 1, 2026), ADMT obligations (effective 2026, deadline Jan 1, 2027), CPPA enforcement (Disney $2.75M, PlayOn $1.1M, Ford $375K), penalty exposure, GDPR comparison, and gap assessments for businesses operating in or targeting California residents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) advisor for NZ government agencies and their supply chains. Use for NZISM control guidance, gap analysis, agency security obligations, classification framework (Unclassified through Top Secret), security risk management, system certification, and GCSB/NCSC NZ compliance. Triggers on: NZISM controls, NZ government security, GCSB compliance, agency cybersecurity obligations, NZ classification markings, Restricted/Confidential/Secret system scoping, agency security policies, third-party supplier security, Certification and Accreditation (C&A), and any question about NZ government information security requirements or the NZISM framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert CIS Controls v8 (CIS Top 18) advisor — implementation group scoping (IG1/IG2/IG3), control gap assessments, safeguard-level guidance, asset inventory, software inventory, data protection, secure configuration, account management, access control, continuous vulnerability management, audit log management, email and web browser protections, malware defenses, network infrastructure management, network monitoring and defense, application software security, incident response, penetration testing, and CIS Controls mapping to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and CMMC. Use for any question about CIS Controls, CIS Benchmarks, Implementation Groups, or prioritized cyber hygiene for any organization size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ISO 27001:2022 ISMS implementation and cybersecurity governance for HealthTech and MedTech. Use for ISMS design, risk assessment per Clause 6.1.2, Annex A controls, ISO 27001 certification, security audits, and incident response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NIS2 Directive (EU 2022/2555) compliance for critical infrastructure entities, covering the 10 minimum security measures. Use for NIS2 compliance assessments, entity scope analysis, supply chain security, and incident reporting readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an application or system — including one built quickly with AI coding agents — needs a security review with regulatory grounding: a STRIDE threat model, a LINDDUN privacy threat model, a dependency exposure screen against live CVE / CISA-KEV / EPSS data, or a selected, non-exhaustive screen of which EU security obligations (GDPR, NIS2, Cyber Resilience Act, AI Act) may apply and which need determination. Orchestrates the server-enforced threat-modeling workflows of the Ansvar Gateway MCP connector and grounds every regulatory statement in officially published text fetched at answer time — scope, role, and application-date limits stated, never a compliance verdict. Never simulates a workflow and never answers legal questions from model memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) advisor for NZ government agencies and their supply chains. Use for NZISM control guidance, gap analysis, agency security obligations, classification framework (Unclassified through Top Secret), security risk management, system certification, and GCSB/NCSC NZ compliance. Triggers on: NZISM controls, NZ government security, GCSB compliance, agency cybersecurity obligations, NZ classification markings, Restricted/Confidential/Secret system scoping, agency security policies, third-party supplier security, Certification and Accreditation (C&A), and any question about NZ government information security requirements or the NZISM framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a security incident, data breach, or actively exploited vulnerability raises the question "who must we notify, where, and by when?" Screens one incident across the EU reporting regimes — NIS2, GDPR, DORA, and the Cyber Resilience Act — determines which duties fire for each involved entity's roles, resolves the receiving authority per regime and member state from served national law, and produces a deadline table in which every duty, authority, and deadline is cited from official publisher text fetched live through the Ansvar Gateway MCP connector. Never answers from model memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance advisor — business threshold analysis, consumer rights fulfillment (access, delete, correct, opt-out of sale/sharing, limit SPI, ADMT opt-out), privacy notice drafting, service provider vs. contractor vs. third-party classification, sensitive personal information (SPI) handling, data minimization, opt-out mechanisms (including GPC), cybersecurity audits and risk assessments (live since Jan 1, 2026), ADMT obligations (effective 2026, deadline Jan 1, 2027), CPPA enforcement (Disney $2.75M, PlayOn $1.1M, Ford $375K), penalty exposure, GDPR comparison, and gap assessments for businesses operating in or targeting California residents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert CIS Controls v8 (CIS Top 18) advisor — implementation group scoping (IG1/IG2/IG3), control gap assessments, safeguard-level guidance, asset inventory, software inventory, data protection, secure configuration, account management, access control, continuous vulnerability management, audit log management, email and web browser protections, malware defenses, network infrastructure management, network monitoring and defense, application software security, incident response, penetration testing, and CIS Controls mapping to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and CMMC. Use for any question about CIS Controls, CIS Benchmarks, Implementation Groups, or prioritized cyber hygiene for any organization size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks what the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) means for their product, whether and when they must report a vulnerability or incident, or what a specific CVE triggers legally. Maps a product with digital elements to CRA scope, product classification, Annex I vulnerability-handling duties, and Article 14 reporting obligations — every legal claim cited from official regulation text fetched live through the Ansvar Gateway MCP connector, joined with live CVE / CISA-KEV / EPSS vulnerability intelligence from the same connector.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cyber threat intelligence and OSINT analysis toolkit. Runs structured investigations and delivers analyst-grade intelligence products with sourced, trust-scored findings. Use for OSINT and CTI cases, digital-footprint and exposure review, domain/subdomain/DNS/certificate recon, web-infrastructure pivoting (favicon hashes, tracker IDs, TLS certs, phishing-kit fingerprinting, campaign clustering), username/email/phone enumeration, breach and infostealer-log triage, image forensics, geolocation, crypto-wallet and IBAN/bank-account tracing, darknet search, M365/Azure and SaaS tenant recon, China/Sinophone recon (ICP filings, PRC corporate registries, Baidu/FOFA/Quake/ZoomEye), vulnerability and ransomware lookup, threat modeling, PII redaction, and structured reporting. Commands include /case, /sweep, /query, /webpivot, /username, /phone, /email-deep, /breach-deep, /icp, /cn-corp, /iban, /stealer-log, /exposure, /threat-model, /report, /brief, /redact, /apikeys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates defensive controls with paired authorized action and observation evidence, distinguishing blocked, prevented, detected, responded, and telemetry-gap outcomes. Use for purple-team validation design or offline fixture review; not unsanctioned testing or production efficacy claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adjudicates authorized exercise outcomes against independently held ground truth, redacted evidence, and explicit status boundaries. Use when comparing observations, resolving discrepancies, or preparing evidence-led security-review handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts hypothesis-driven, evidence-preserving threat hunts with bounded negative conclusions and telemetry-gap handling. Use for hunt hypotheses, scoped offline analysis, or analytic follow-up; not unscoped scanning, malware execution, or generic intelligence summaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and reviews detections from telemetry prerequisites, correlation logic, Sigma metadata, severity, status, and benign cases. Use for detection rules, Sigma review, analytic coverage, or tuning; not generic logging advice or live deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NIST SP 800-61r3-aligned incident triage that preserves evidence, separates analysis from authorization, and records status. Use for incident intake, severity assessment, containment readiness, or evidence preservation; not generic debugging or unscoped response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches malware analysis, CVEs, attribution reports, and hacker community sources. Use when the album subject involves cybersecurity incidents or threat actors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems from a maintainer-authored or maintainer-sanitized NIS2 engineering evidence inventory. Supports essential or important entities, critical-sector services, managed service providers, supply-chain dependencies, and cybersecurity incident escalation obligations without ingesting raw code, logs, runbooks, tickets, provider documents, or other operational free text. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, design, and migrate Identity and Access Management — cloud provider IAM (AWS, GCP, Azure), identity providers (Okta, Entra ID / Azure AD, Auth0, Google Workspace), application authorization (RBAC, ABAC, ReBAC), and federated identity. Use when the user mentions 'IAM,' 'identity,' 'access management,' 'least privilege,' 'role design,' 'SSO,' 'SAML,' 'OIDC,' 'OAuth,' 'JIT access,' 'just-in-time access,' 'break-glass,' 'service accounts,' 'RBAC,' 'ABAC,' 'privilege creep,' 'role explosion,' 'identity governance,' 'IAM strategy,' 'identity migration,' 'Okta,' 'Entra ID,' 'Azure AD,' 'Auth0,' 'Cognito,' or needs identity consultant-level guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the security slice). Use when the user mentions 'AI risk,' 'AI governance,' 'NIST AI RMF,' 'AI compliance,' 'ML governance,' 'model risk management,' 'AI fairness,' 'AI bias,' 'algorithmic accountability,' 'AI Bill of Rights,' 'EU AI Act,' 'AI transparency,' 'model card,' 'AI red team,' 'AI safety,' 'responsible AI,' 'model drift,' 'concept drift,' 'AI monitoring,' 'AI incident,' or needs to assess or govern an AI / ML system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。