「diagnose」の検索結果

Use Spotify Chartify to build tidy pandas/Bokeh charts, route plot workflows, customize styling, and diagnose output/configuration issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use bm25s for sparse lexical retrieval: tokenize text, build and query BM25 indexes, persist or memory-map them, run the high-level or bm25 CLI workflows, and diagnose optional acceleration and integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix Kubernetes pods, CrashLoopBackOff, Pending, DNS, networking, storage, and rollout failures with kubectl.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coach workers, employees, and individual contributors to turn meetings, transcripts, minutes, and work notes into better execution: infer leader expectations, diagnose previous work, identify next actions, judge delivery readiness, and prepare a high-bandwidth update. Use after meetings, during work, before reviews, or across repeated low-value discussions. Perform semantic review from source evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在短视频正文完成后，检查并生成前五秒开头，让开场更抓人、可信，并与正文承诺一致。用户要求优化视频开头、降低开头流失、写口播 Hook 或增强第一句话时使用。 English: Diagnose and write the first five seconds of a short video after the main script is ready, making the opening engaging, credible, and consistent with the video's promise. Use to improve retention, create a spoken hook, or strengthen the first line.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes an existing codebase using strategic Domain-Driven Design to discover bounded contexts, surface ubiquitous language and semantic collisions, find places where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries, and produce an evidence-backed domain and context map. Use when the goal is DDD-specific: bounded context discovery, ubiquitous language analysis, domain model discovery, or mapping contested ownership and responsibility. The entire repository is a valid scope; no module or directory must be named first. Does not assess architectural coupling, cohesion, or technical debt — use architectural-analysis. Does not design service communication, integration patterns, or deployment topology — use architectural-analysis or plan-a-feature. Does not refactor code, diagnose bugs, or review code quality — use refactor, investigate, or code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans an architecture-driven change to code that already exists: module boundaries, type responsibilities, layering, coupling, and the public surface a revision moves. Produces a buildable change plan that names the types, modules, and methods involved and records the surface delta each change makes. Use when the user wants to plan, scope, or sequence a restructure, extraction, split, consolidation, responsibility shift, or API revision of existing code, including "these responsibilities are wrong, plan the fix". Does not assess an area and stop at findings — use architectural-analysis. Does not specify new behavior — use plan-a-feature. Does not diagnose a bug — use investigate. Does not write the code — use refactor to restructure it or tdd to build it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an evidence-based investigation of a bug, failure, or unexpected behavior with investigate and publishes the resulting investigation report to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants something debugged, diagnosed, or root-caused AND the findings posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not investigate to a local file only — use investigate. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not plan the structural change a root cause calls for — use plan-a-change. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, diagnose, and verify performance budgets, latency targets, load tests, capacity estimates, bottleneck analysis, caching strategy, query efficiency, queue throughput, and regression gates. Use when a feature may be slow, a system must scale, a performance regression is suspected, or release readiness depends on throughput, cost, memory, CPU, or response time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose slow or freezing VS Code-compatible editors with evidence-first, zero-hardcoded-assumption workflow. Use when the user reports editor lag, typing delay, UI freezes, extension host stalls, file watcher noise, high editor CPU/RSS, uses VS Code/Cursor as a file browser over a large folder, or wants a safe editor performance audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route substantial coding or repository-review work through a two-stage Sol commander/verifier and separate Luna Max CLI worker. Use when the user explicitly asks Sol to direct or supervise Luna, explicitly requests this router, needs an isolated auditable Luna-owned implementation with a Sol review loop, or asks to diagnose or measure the router itself. Do not use merely because a task involves coding, verification, progress reporting, or token saving. For small or straightforward tasks, keep work in Sol unless the user explicitly requests Luna; router configuration, usage, and efficiency questions should use read-only inspection without launching a worker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, produce, or diagnose evidence-backed product demo videos and screen-recorded promotional walkthroughs. Use when the user asks to make a product demo, launch video, feature showcase, app walkthrough, demo reel, or polished recording; wants every important capability shown without a slow feature tour; asks to remove dead time or fix narration-to-action pacing; or needs a repeatable script, capture plan, and verified final media. Do not use for fictional commercials with no real product proof, general-purpose video editing, or documentation-only tutorials that do not need a promotional narrative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and organize AI coding-agent instructions, including AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, skills, and agent definitions. Use when the user asks to diagnose conflicting instructions, excessive approval pauses, broad skill triggers, duplicate guidance, or broken instruction references, or to clean up that instruction set. Ordinary code review, Markdown editing, or application debugging alone does not trigger this workflow. Inspection stays read-only; apply changes when authorized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to diagnose CSS and frontend layout issues such as positioning, overflow clipping, Tailwind class conflicts, z-index stacking, and React rendering visibility problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose excessive Codex local SQLite diagnostic log writes with read-only evidence by default. Use when a user mentions logs_2.sqlite, logs_2.sqlite-wal, block_log_inserts, SSD/TBW wear, or explicitly asks to protect, clean up, verify, or restore Codex diagnostic logging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, derive, optimize, explain, and diagnose cinematic Eastern xianxia camera direction, storyboards, motion choreography, pacing, continuity locks, keyframes, and per-shot image-to-video prompts. Use for 仙侠运镜、镜头语言、分镜、推拉摇移、跟拍、环绕、航拍、打斗追逐、情绪镜头、首尾帧、视频提示词、参考视频诊断, when users ask “怎么运镜/不会运镜/给案例/帮我改运镜”, or when an input contains invalid, contradictory, physically implausible, non-camera, or off-topic instructions that need actionable feedback. Support 16:9, 21:9, 4:3, 3:2, 4:5, and 9:16; default to 30 seconds, 16:9, six shots, narrative-adaptive pacing, epic scale, and selective high saturation when unspecified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose malformed calls, retries, and unusable results after an agent selects an MCP tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instruments programs to capture execution traces specifically for reproducing reported bugs, enabling consistent replay and diagnosis of failures. Use this skill when you need to reproduce a bug, capture execution traces for debugging, instrument code to record program behavior, generate replay scripts for bug reproduction, diagnose hard-to-reproduce failures, or perform deterministic replay of program execution. Triggers when users ask to instrument code for tracing, capture execution traces, reproduce bugs, generate replay scripts, or enable deterministic debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose failing tests with screenshots, replays, and logs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chinese Word document formatting toolkit for .docx/.doc/.wps workflows. Use when Codex needs to diagnose document formatting, fix mixed Chinese/English punctuation and spacing, apply official/academic/legal/custom presets, normalize tables and page numbers, preserve or output Word revision marks, convert plain text or Markdown into formatted DOCX, or batch/script document cleanup for Chinese official documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。