「evaluate」の検索結果

GDPR Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) — Guided assessment for Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the EDPB three-step test. Based on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), the OSS Case Digest on Legitimate Interest (McIntyre 2026), CNIL AI guidance (June 2025), ICO guidance, and key CJEU case law. Use when: (1) user needs to assess whether legitimate interest is appropriate, (2) user asks about Art. 6(1)(f), "Interessenabwägung", "berechtigtes Interesse", "balancing test", or "LIA", (3) user wants to document a legitimate interest assessment, (4) user mentions the three-step test, (5) user evaluates necessity or proportionality under Art. 6(1)(f), (6) user discusses direct marketing, fraud prevention, IT security, employee monitoring, AI training, web scraping, or credit checks in context of legal basis, (7) user handles a right to object (Art. 21), (8) user asks about children's data, profiling, or cross-border data sharing under legitimate interest, (9) user compares legitimate interest against other legal bases. Do NOT use for: consent assessments (Art. 6(1)(a)), contract performance (Art. 6(1)(b)), DPIA workflows, or pure ePrivacy/cookie compliance questions — though the skill does address the ePrivacy/GDPR overlap where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Require the learner to explain a concept in their own words before the AI evaluates or extends it. Ensures the AI works from the learner's understanding rather than providing an explanation from scratch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After any AI-generated explanation, require the learner to identify one place it could be wrong, one thing to check, and one source to consult. Builds epistemic vigilance — treats AI output as a claim to evaluate, not truth to absorb.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a source evaluation protocol using lateral reading and credibility checks for digital information. Use when students need to evaluate websites, online sources, or social media claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a teacher-drafted central historical question for its capacity to drive genuine historical inquiry. Use when assessing whether a question will generate real evidence-weighing or produce shallow responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a structured protocol for auditing AI-generated text against Ennis's six CT standards. Use when students need to critically evaluate AI output in any subject.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a Funhouse Mirror activity where students use their own domain expertise to detect AI distortions, omissions, and overconfidence. Use when students know a subject well enough to evaluate AI claims about it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, evaluate, implement, or review image and video generation connectors for Timeline Studio. Use when adding a provider plugin, extracting the generation plugin host or registry, or checking a connector against Timeline Studio's authentication, output, localization, and My assets contract. Do not use for ordinary video editing or Codex plugin packaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and evaluate potential A-share investment opportunities for China-focused private equity and investment strategies. Adapted from the original deal-sourcing skill for Chinese market structure, data sources, and business practices. Triggers on "A股项目挖掘", "投资项目发现", "deal sourcing China", "find A-share deals", "sourcing opportunities China", or "discover investment targets".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess an A-share portfolio company's AI readiness for China-focused private equity investments. Evaluates data infrastructure, technology stack, talent, and AI adoption opportunities in the Chinese market context. Triggers on "A股公司AI评估", "AI readiness China", "AI assessment portfolio company", "AI转型评估", or "artificial intelligence readiness [company]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen and evaluate A-share investment opportunities. Adapts the original deal-screening skill for Chinese market data sources, A-share screening criteria, and domestic deal origination. Triggers on "A股标的筛选", "标的筛选", "screening China", "deal screening A-share", "筛选投资标的", or "screen for [criteria]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visual specialist for full audits. Captures screenshots, evaluates above-the-fold signals, and checks mobile rendering basics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," or "free resource." This skill bridges engineering and marketing — useful for founders and technical marketers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides you through comprehensive iOS/Swift app planning and analysis. Use for new apps (concept to architecture) or existing apps (audit current state, plan improvements, evaluate tech stack). Covers product planning, technical decisions, UI/UX design, and distribution strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and plan Amazon marketplace expansion across countries and regions. Use when a seller asks which Amazon marketplace to enter, how to compare international demand and economics, what tax, product-compliance, logistics, localization, account, or launch workstreams to investigate, or how to build a gated global-selling roadmap. Do not use as legal, tax, customs, or certification advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate whether a Stripe dispute is economical to contest, then gather evidence and submit only when approved. Use for Stripe disputes, chargebacks, counter-disputes, evidence packages, or Stripe dispute IDs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate, evaluate, and A/B test email subject lines for maximum open rates. Includes formulas for curiosity, urgency, personalization, and more. Trigger phrases: "email subject line", "subject line ideas", "email subject", "write subject lines", "A/B test subject lines", "improve open rates", "email open rate", "subject line formulas".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score product remarkability 1-10 to decide if it's worth promoting. Seth Godin's Purple Cow test. Triggers on: "is this product worth promoting", "should I promote", "product audit", "purple cow", "remarkable product", "is it remarkable", "rate this product", "product quality check", "worth my reputation", "product evaluation", "would I recommend without commission", "product remarkability score", "evaluate this affiliate product", "quality gate for promotion".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and evaluate affiliate programs to find the best ones to promote. Use this skill when the user asks anything about finding affiliate programs, comparing commission rates, evaluating affiliate opportunities, searching for products to promote, picking a niche, or mentions openaffiliate.dev. Also trigger for: "which SaaS should I promote", "best affiliate programs for X", "high commission programs", "recurring commission affiliate", "compare these affiliate programs", "is X affiliate program worth it", "find me something to promote", "what pays the most", "affiliate programs with long cookie duration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the four paper-quality autoraters from PaperOrchestra (arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.3) — Citation F1 (P0/P1 partition + Precision/Recall/F1), Literature Review Quality (6-axis 0-100 with anti-inflation rules), SxS Overall Paper Quality (side-by-side), and SxS Literature Review Quality (side-by-side). TRIGGER when the user asks to "score this paper draft", "evaluate against the benchmark", "compare two papers", or "run the autoraters".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer raw materials (Sparse idea, Dense idea, experimental log) from an existing AI research paper to build a benchmark case for evaluating paper-writing pipelines. Replicates the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from arXiv:2604.05018 §3 / App. C. TRIGGER when the user asks to "build a benchmark case from this paper", "reverse-engineer raw materials", or "evaluate my pipeline against PaperWritingBench".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。