「experiment」の検索結果

Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run parallel feature work safely with Git worktrees. Standardizes branch isolation, port allocation, environment sync, and cleanup so each worktree behaves like an independent local app. Optimized for multi-agent workflows where each agent or terminal session owns one worktree. Use when running multiple feature branches simultaneously, isolating experimental work, or coordinating multi-agent development across the same repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a new OpenSpec change using the experimental artifact workflow. Use when the user wants to create a new feature, fix, or modification with a structured step-by-step approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to create, scaffold, or edit Jupyter notebooks (`.ipynb`) for experiments, explorations, or tutorials; prefer the bundled templates and run the helper script `new_notebook.py` to generate a clean starting notebook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brainstorm 3-5 monetization strategies with audience fit, risks, and validation experiments. Use when exploring revenue models, evaluating pricing strategies, or deciding how to monetize a product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prioritize assumptions using an Impact × Risk matrix and suggest experiments for each. Use when triaging a list of assumptions, deciding what to test first, or applying the assumption prioritization canvas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to opportunities, solutions, and experiments. Based on Teresa Torres' Continuous Discovery Habits. Use when structuring discovery work, mapping opportunities to solutions, or deciding what to build next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze A/B test results with statistical significance, sample size validation, confidence intervals, and ship/extend/stop recommendations. Use when evaluating experiment results, checking if a test reached significance, interpreting split test data, or deciding whether to ship a variant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sweep configured feedback sources (Slack, GitHub Issues; email experimental) for new items: acknowledge at source, analyze recordings, verify fixes merged to main, and emit an `lfg`-ready plan. First run sets up sources; supports mode:non-interactive for scheduled runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement or review a native managed NemoClaw runtime provider and its activation or qualification. Excludes the portable experimental profile.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to do feature work in this repo with git worktrees via `pnpm worktree`. Each worktree gets its own branch, its own block of app ports, its own node_modules, and by default shares the primary checkout's standard local Supabase DB for fast setup; pass `--db` for its own database (a copy of the primary inside the same Postgres) when the work needs migrations or destructive data changes. Load WHENEVER starting a feature, bugfix, refactor, experiment, or any change you'll want to run/test in isolation; whenever the user mentions worktrees, isolated/parallel dev instances, running multiple branches at once, or 'spin up a worktree'; and whenever you need the exact non-interactive `pnpm worktree` commands and flags. Enforces: one canonical branch per objective, one worktree per branch — join the existing worktree instead of creating another.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly reusable-session feature-flag cleanup for {{target_repo}}. Inventories every feature flag, classifies each as fully rolled out, long dead, partial rollout, or active experiment, removes the flag and the dead branch it guards on an isolated branch when the suite is green, and opens a PR — never touching a flag still mid-rollout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and integrate web interfaces via three paths: DirectDesign (write design inline with Anthropic frontend-design philosophy — the default workhorse), native /design + /design-sync Claude Code commands (preferred for code integration and design-system sync), or ClaudeDesign (drive claude.ai/design through Interceptor — experimental visual-review fallback). USE WHEN web design, UI design, create prototype, design system, design sync, redesign site, mockup, landing page, dashboard design, design-to-code, frontend design, polish UI, design audit, brutalist/editorial/retro UI. NOT FOR illustrations/logos (use Art) or video (use Remotion).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate publication-quality figures and tables from experiment results. Use when user says \"画图\", \"作图\", \"generate figures\", \"paper figures\", or needs plots for a paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a working artifact from a plain "implement X for me" request: a running end-to-end spine first, then one feature per rung, with every under-determined decision written to an assumption ledger BEFORE the code that depends on it and a sweep for the ones that slipped through undeclared (same-family provisional in the base Codex mirror). Use when user says "给我实现", "implement X", "帮我做一个能跑的", "先搭个原型再加功能", "build this feature", "prototype then extend", or hands over a capability description rather than an experiment plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a structured paper outline from review conclusions and experiment results. Use when user says \"写大纲\", \"paper outline\", \"plan the paper\", \"论文规划\", or wants to create a paper plan before writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a deep critical review of research from GPT using a secondary Codex agent. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a deep critical review of research from Gemini via gemini-review MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a deep critical review of research from Claude via claude-review MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full end-to-end research pipeline: from a broad research direction through idea discovery, experiments, and review all the way to a polished paper PDF. Use when user says "全流程", "full pipeline", "从找idea到投稿", "end-to-end research", or wants the complete autonomous research lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a deep critical review of research from an external reviewer backend (Codex or manual). Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow 5: orchestrate a text-only resubmit of a polished paper to a different venue under hard constraints (no new experiments, no bib edits, no framework changes, never overwrite prior submissions). Use when user says "resubmit pipeline", "重投流程", "port paper to <new venue>", "resubmit to <venue>", "tighten paper for resubmission", or has a rejected/withdrawn paper to move to a different top venue under tight time budget.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。