「improve」の検索結果

Use when you need to design, review, or improve REST APIs with Micronaut — including @Controller routes, HTTP status codes, DTOs, Bean Validation, exception handlers, pagination, idempotency, ETag/If-Match, caching headers, versioning, contract-first OpenAPI (OpenAPI Generator), optional runtime OpenAPI via micronaut-openapi, and security annotations. This should trigger for requests such as Review or improve Micronaut @Controller REST APIs; Add validation, error handling, or align controllers with the OpenAPI contract on Micronaut HTTP layer. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to write or improve integration tests for Quarkus — including @QuarkusTest, Dev Services for automatic container provisioning, Testcontainers via QuarkusTestResourceLifecycleManager, WireMock for external HTTP stubs, @QuarkusIntegrationTest for black-box testing against packaged artifacts, REST Assured, data isolation strategies (@TestTransaction vs @BeforeEach cleanup), and Maven Surefire/Failsafe three-tier split (*Test, *IT, *AT). This should trigger for requests such as Add or improve integration tests in a Quarkus project; Configure Testcontainers or Dev Services for Quarkus tests; Add WireMock stubs for external HTTP dependencies in Quarkus integration tests; Set up @QuarkusIntegrationTest for packaged artifact or native binary testing; Fix test data isolation or configure Maven Surefire/Failsafe split. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to design, review, or improve REST APIs with Quarkus REST (Jakarta REST) — including resource classes, HTTP methods, status codes, request/response DTOs, Bean Validation, exception mappers, optional runtime OpenAPI exposure (SmallRye), contract-first generation from OpenAPI, content negotiation, pagination, sorting and filtering, API versioning, idempotency (Idempotency-Key), optimistic concurrency (ETag / If-Match), HTTP caching (Cache-Control), API deprecation (Sunset / Deprecation headers), RFC 7807 Problem Details, ISO-8601 for time in contracts, and security-aware boundaries. This should trigger for requests such as Review or improve JAX-RS resources in a Quarkus project; Design HTTP APIs with validation and error handling on Quarkus; Add API versioning, idempotency, ETag concurrency, or deprecation headers; Implement pagination, sorting, or RFC 7807 Problem Details error responses. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to design, review, or improve security in Spring Boot applications — including SecurityFilterChain, OAuth2/JWT resource server patterns, form login basics, method security (@PreAuthorize), CSRF and CORS for APIs, session fixation, security headers, exception handling, password encoding, and sensitive-data-safe logging. This should trigger for requests such as Add Spring Boot security support; Review Spring Boot security configuration; Improve API authorization in Spring Boot; Add JWT resource server security in Spring Boot; Harden Spring Boot security headers and CSRF settings. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when recurring process failures, obsolete rules, or an explicit user request call for harness improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect articulation gaps in documents using 5W analysis and provide concrete improvement suggestions. Identifies what's missing in explanation, not what's wrong. Default runs detection + improvement; use --check-only for detection only. 旧名 check-articulation。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively detects and auto-fixes technical debt in a codebase using three quality criteria from debt-analysis references: conditional branch simplification, encapsulation, and separation of concerns. Applies fixes directly to code, runs existing tests to verify no regressions, re-analyzes, and loops until all high-severity issues are resolved or max iterations (5) reached. Use this skill when you want to automatically improve code quality with real code changes, reduce technical debt systematically, or clean up code to meet quality standards. Trigger on phrases like "fix technical debt", "clean up code quality", "refactor and fix issues", "improve code quality automatically", "apply debt fixes", "fix code problems", "eliminate debt".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

テストカバレッジのギャップを体系的に分析し、実際に動くテストコードを提案するスキル。 以下のようなときに使う： - テストカバレッジを改善したい・不足テストを特定したい - 「テストが足りない」「カバレッジを上げたい」「どこをテストすべき」 - 「未テストの関数」「what tests am I missing」「improve test coverage」「coverage gap」 t-wada式TDDの原則に基づき、テストの抜け漏れを特定して優先度付きで補完する。 引数: 分析対象ファイル・ディレクトリ（省略時はプロジェクト全体）

Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve code structure, readability, and maintainability without changing external behavior through systematic refactoring techniques like extracting functions, removing duplication, simplifying conditionals, and applying design patterns. Use when reducing technical debt, extracting functions or classes, removing code duplication, simplifying complex conditionals, renaming for clarity, applying design patterns, improving code organization, reducing coupling, increasing cohesion, or maintaining test coverage during structural improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous tech-debt reduction workflow for the Humans repository. Use when the user wants Codex to improve high-value code quality issues in a dedicated git worktree branched from origin/main, commit each improvement separately, push progress, and continue until diminishing returns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' 'copy sweep,' 'tighten this up,' 'this reads awkwardly,' 'clean up this text,' 'too wordy,' or 'sharpen the messaging.' Use this when the user already has copy and wants it improved rather than rewritten from scratch. For writing new copy, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," "CTA copy," "value proposition," "tagline," "subheadline," "hero section copy," "above the fold," "this copy is weak," "make this more compelling," or "help me describe my product." Use this whenever someone is working on website text that needs to persuade or convert. For email copy, see email-sequence. For popup copy, see popup-cro. For editing existing copy, see copy-editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize, improve, or increase conversions on any marketing page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, or blog posts. Also use when the user says "CRO," "conversion rate optimization," "this page isn't converting," "improve conversions," "why isn't this page working," "my landing page sucks," "nobody's converting," "low conversion rate," "bounce rate is too high," "people leave without signing up," or "this page needs work." Use this even if the user just shares a URL and asks for feedback — they probably want conversion help. For signup/registration flows, see signup-flow-cro. For post-signup activation, see onboarding-cro. For forms outside of signup, see form-cro. For popups/modals, see popup-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor code to improve quality while maintaining functionality. Use when you need to improve code structure, eliminate duplication, optimize performance, or enhance maintainability without changing behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit orchestrator for agent skills — scans for prompt injection, data exfiltration, credential theft, supply chain risks, and instruction hierarchy violations before any skill is installed, created, improved, or read from a GitHub repo. Load when creating skills from external sources, when improve-skills reads from GitHub repos, when research-skill fetches community SKILL.md files, when a user installs a third-party skill, or when the user asks to audit skill security, scan for injection, check if a skill is safe, scan all skills, or run a security sweep. Orchestrates all secure-* skills in sequence. Content is SAFE only if ALL secure-* skills return SAFE. 36% of community skills contain flaws (Snyk ToxicSkills 2026). This skill is the first line of defense.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and resolve naming collisions, overlapping intent triggers, and insufficient intent diversity across the skill library. Load when a new skill is created (called by universal-skill-creator), during improvement passes (called by improve-skills), or when the user asks to deconflict skills, check for naming collisions, audit trigger overlap, review intent coverage, find duplicate triggers, check skill names, or says "are any skills too similar", "which skills overlap", "deconflict the library", "check for confusing skill names", "intent audit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for agent harness work — the setup that makes AI agents follow project rules and improve when they fail. FIRES PROACTIVELY when agents misbehave, repeat mistakes, ignore instructions, skip skills, or when AGENTS.md exists but docs/harness/manifest.json is missing. Also triggers on: harness engineering, agent scaffold, agent keeps failing, agent not following instructions, make agents reliable, agents going off rails, agent forgot context, improve agent setup, self-improving agents, agents keep making mistakes, why is my agent bad, agent quality, agent setup broken, agents ignore skills, same mistake again, fix agent behavior, tune agent instructions, set up agent infrastructure, after project setup agents still bad. Routes bootstrap vs evolution. Not multi-agent topology — agent-builder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable skill knowledge from academic papers and research articles, assess credibility, run security checks, and either improve existing skills or create new ones. Load when the user asks to learn from a paper, extract insights from a research paper, turn a paper into a skill, apply paper findings to skills, read this paper and improve my skills, or process a research article. Also triggers on "skill from paper", "learn from this paper", "paper to skill", "extract from this research", "apply this paper", or when the user uploads or links to an academic PDF or paper URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve agent reliability over time — diagnose why agents fail and fix the setup. Triggers on: agent keeps failing, same mistake again, agent not improving, make agent smarter, agent quality plateau, agents ignore skills, agent skips tests, fix agent behavior, agent unreliable, improve agent setup, self-improving harness, agents worse over time, tune agent instructions, agent going in circles, agent ignores AGENTS.md, repeated agent errors. Requires harness v0 and eval harness. AUTO-ROUTED from harness-engineering on symptoms. Not first setup — harness-generation first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured retrospective after development-phase runs of your product's agents — interview the owner in plain language about what went well and poorly, draft ranked improvement hypotheses, then design and run small n=1/n=2 experiments with pre-declared success criteria, guardrails, stop conditions, and a cost/ROI kill-switch. Load when the user says how did that run go, retro this run, the agent output was bad, what should we improve, draft hypotheses, run a small experiment, or after repeated dev runs of an agentic system produce uneven quality. Priority: output quality over performance over cost, each with diminishing-returns stops. NOT a product A/B test (experimentation), NOT coding-agent harness repair (harness-evolution), NOT production-scale learning (runtime-learning-loop).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or improve a Coval dashboard with metric visualizations backed by real data. Creates new dashboards from scratch or rebuilds existing ones by analyzing usage patterns, metric frequency, and data density. Use when user says "create a dashboard", "build a dashboard", "improve my dashboard", "add widgets", "visualize my metrics", "make a performance dashboard", or "dashboard for my runs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。