「infra」の検索結果

估算一次模型执行能否放入给定硬件，并定位计算、访存和串行等待的下界。用于粗估容量、时延或优化收益；具体模型结构另用 model-footprint。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

比较数据、张量、序列、上下文、流水和专家并行的容量与通信代价。用于决定多卡切分和超节点规模。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

比较模型或任务放在端侧、边缘或云端时的交互延迟、网络传输、能耗与恢复。用于多模态和实时 Agent 部署。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

为单实例推理服务比较批处理、请求调度、KV 缓存、卸载和推测解码。用于容量、吞吐、延迟和每合格请求成本的取舍。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

估算训练或 RL 作业的显存、步时、checkpoint、故障重做和完成期限。用于比较分片、重计算、卸载与集群规模。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

规划 Agent 模型调用与工具环境的创建、驻留、释放和恢复。用于并发容量、沙箱成本与完整任务时延分析。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

把持续请求、多轮 Agent、实时交互或 RL 轨迹转成容量与时延负载。用于估算峰值、状态驻留和完成任务的真实成本。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user wants to "deploy an agent", "deploy my ADK agent", "set up CI/CD", "configure secrets", "troubleshoot a deployment", or needs guidance on Agent Runtime, Cloud Run, or GKE deployment targets, or binding an agent to an Agent Gateway. Covers deployment workflows, service accounts, rollback, and production infrastructure. Applies to any framework agents-cli deploys (ADK, LangChain, ...). Part of the agents-cli skills suite. Do NOT use for agent API code patterns (ADK: use google-agents-cli-adk-code), evaluation (use google-agents-cli-eval), or project scaffolding (use google-agents-cli-scaffold).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

云原生基础设施。Kubernetes、Helm、Kustomize、Operator、CRD、GitOps、ArgoCD、Flux、IaC、Terraform、Pulumi、CDK。当用户提到 K8s、Helm、GitOps、IaC 时路由到此。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add and test declarative behavior-defined agentic engines in gh-aw, extending Go infrastructure only when necessary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make a custom AI agent — Python or TypeScript/JavaScript, on a framework or hand-built — report what it did to Failproof AI, and run your own evaluator worker (the "eval pod") that scores those runs. Reach for it on vague phrasing too: "add observability to my agent", "why isn't my agent showing up?", "run an LLM judge on our own infra". Trigger when the user wants to: • plan an integration — which points in the agent loop to record; • instrument — add `failproofai-sdk` (Python) or `@failproofai/sdk` (Node, Bun, Deno, Next.js): turn on an adapter (LangChain/LangGraph, CrewAI, LlamaIndex, Pydantic AI, Vercel AI SDK, Mastra) or wire a hand-built loop; • verify — confirm events are written, or debug an integration that produces nothing; • evaluate — write, deploy or debug an Evaluator worker in Python or TypeScript. NOT for reading telemetry or scores that already landed (that's `fp-cloud-cli`), or deciding what is worth evaluating (that's `failproofai-eval-brainstorm`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive OSINT methodology for external red-team operations and authorized attack-surface assessments. Covers the 5-stage recon pipeline (seed discovery, asset expansion, enrichment, exposure analysis, reporting), asset-graph discipline with 29 asset types, severity rubric (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/INFO), confidence upgrade workflows, time budgeting, asset-level triage rules, scale-based tactics, identity-fabric mapping (Entra/Okta/ADFS/Google/SAML/M365 Teams+SharePoint+OAuth), API and auth-map methodology, JavaScript deep analysis, mobile attack surface, cloud attack surface, breach×identity correlation, detectability tagging, detection-aware probing (back-off, persona rotation), read-only validator discipline, WAF/CDN bypass + origin discovery, vulnerability prioritization (CVE/EPSS/KEV), phishing infrastructure planning + pretext development, bug bounty submission templates, client deliverable templates with risk translation, threat-actor investigation (incl. RU/CN pivots), cryptocurrency tracing, image/video forensics, chronolocation. Use when planning or executing reconnaissance against authorized targets, mapping an organization's external attack surface, investigating a person/entity, tracing crypto flows, geolocating media, or performing attribution work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt TLS/SSL and DNS misconfigurations — missing HSTS (downgrade attack), weak cipher suites, expired/invalid certificates, mTLS bypass, missing SPF/DKIM/DMARC (email spoofing), DNS Zone Transfer (AXFR), dangling CNAME subdomain takeover, CAA records. Most of these are Info/Low on their own — this skill is opinionated about which findings actually pay (spoofable DMARC with delivered-to-inbox proof, AXFR returning internal hosts, dangling-CNAME takeover) versus which get rejected as best-practice noise (missing CAA, missing HSTS with no MitM position). Use during recon to find infrastructure weaknesses, and to TRIAGE them honestly before reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt Kubernetes & Docker — API anonymous access, kubelet 10250 exec (SPDY/WebSocket, NOT plain POST) and the simpler /run primitive, etcd 2379 unauth, dashboard skip-login, RBAC misconfig, secret/SA-token abuse, docker.sock host escape, runc/container-escape (Leaky Vessels CVE-2024-21626), API-server-mediated nodes/proxy RCE, EphemeralContainers node-shell, bound/projected SA-token audience+expiry abuse, admission-controller bypass, Helm/Tiller remnants. Use when target runs containerized infra, exposes K8s ports (6443/10250/10255/2379/8443), or cloud metadata reveals K8s service accounts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt cloud / infrastructure misconfigurations. AWS: public S3 buckets (s3:GetObject anonymous), permissive bucket policies (PutObjectAcl public-write), exposed CloudFront origin, public Lambda function URL, public RDS snapshot, IAM credentials in JS bundles, AWS metadata accessible via SSRF. GCP: public GCS buckets, exposed Cloud Run services, leaked service account JSON. Azure: public blob containers, exposed Function App. (Kubernetes/Docker exposure is owned by hunt-k8s; CI/CD pipeline attacks by hunt-cicd; post-credential IAM escalation by cloud-iam-deep.) Detection: targeted dorking, certificate transparency, JS bundle secret extraction, port scan for known service ports. Validate: actual data read / write / RCE. Use when hunting cloud-native storage and compute misconfig (S3/GCS/Blob, IMDS-via-SSRF, serverless, public managed services).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a new AI tool end-to-end — Rust implementation, toolset wiring, infra, schema generation, and frontend UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "perform cloud penetration testing", "assess Azure or AWS or GCP security", "enumerate cloud resources", "exploit cloud misconfigurations", "test O365 security", "extract secrets from cloud environments", or "audit cloud infrastructure". It provides comprehensive techniques for security assessment across major cloud platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "pentest AWS", "test AWS security", "enumerate IAM", "exploit cloud infrastructure", "AWS privilege escalation", "S3 bucket testing", "metadata SSRF", "Lambda exploitation", or needs guidance on Amazon Web Services security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish a tagged Echo record after a live infrastructure incident, then link its canonical URL from the associated pull request or issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a read-only preview for a specified Marin infra/pulumi stack and trace each pending resource change to merged pull requests since its latest successful update when that update records a clean Git checkout. Use when a stack has unapplied changes or drift and someone needs to know which PRs explain the preview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the read-only infra/lint PR reporter only when invoked by CI or explicitly requested; do not select it for the commit workflow's fix-and-respond review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Completion Check: Verify Infrastructure Is Wired

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review tutti git diffs for project structure, layering, module ownership, and duplicate event-center infrastructure by planning focused architecture review tasks, then having the main agent orchestrate sub-agents for only the changed areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。