「leak」の検索結果

Build safe, local, defensive reproductions of ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed security vulnerabilities (CVEs, vendor advisories, AI-agent incidents) for whitepapers, control testing, and education. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, or write up a known vulnerability or security incident — phrases like "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "demonstrate the EchoLeak/Cursor/postmark-mcp issue", "show how this exploit worked", "add a reproducibility guide", or "pull the NVD/CVE details for". It fetches advisory metadata from NVD and CVE.org, confirms the issue is fixed, and produces a vulnerable-vs-patched harness that is offline, loopback-only, and uses synthetic markers. It NEVER discovers, develops, or weaponizes new zero-days and refuses any unpatched or live-target request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end methodology for reproducing AND patching publicly disclosed, already-fixed vulnerabilities: sourcing the advisory and the fix commit, reading the patch diff, rebuilding a pinned offline lab, building a vulnerable-vs-patched contrast harness with proper controls, minimizing the trigger, designing and validating the fix, and writing it up as a blog post or whitepaper. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, understand, teach, or write about a known vulnerability or security incident: "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "how did EchoLeak / Log4Shell / the postmark-mcp package actually work", "show me how this exploit worked", "write a blog post about this vulnerability", "set up a lab for CVE-XXXX", "pull the NVD/CVE/OSV details", or "make a PoC I can publish". Use it just as eagerly for the patching half: "how should this be fixed", "is this patch correct", "what would have caught this", "review this security fix", "write a regression test for this CVE", "how do I backport this", or "what's the right fix for this bug class" - even when the user never says the word "reproduce". Reach for it on vague asks like "help me understand this security advisory", "I want to write about this incident", or "can we test whether we were vulnerable" when a disclosed vulnerability is in play. This skill only handles ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed issues and refuses zero-day discovery, live targets, and weaponization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive security and correctness audit of a branch's changes. Use for thermo nuclear, thermonuclear, or deep review requests, or branch/PR diff audits focused on bugs, breaking changes, security issues, devex regressions, and feature-gate leaks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize Python code for reduced memory usage and improved memory efficiency. Use when asked to reduce memory footprint, fix memory leaks, optimize data structures for memory, handle large datasets efficiently, or diagnose memory issues. Covers object sizing, generator patterns, efficient data structures, and memory profiling strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimate heart rate (HR) and breathing rate (BR) in bpm from a cleaned 1-D physiological time series such as radar phase, WiFi CSI amplitude, PPG, or a chest-motion signal. Use when Claude needs to choose HR/BR bandpass edges, pick a peak frequency from a noisy band, reject the HR second harmonic that often dominates the fundamental, handle respiration-harmonic leakage into the HR band on slow breathers, or flag low-confidence estimates. Not for arrhythmia / beat-to-beat analysis, multi-subject source separation, or rapidly non-stationary rates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end pipeline for extracting heart rate (HR) and breathing rate (BR) from raw short-range radar I/Q captures — both continuous-wave (CW, 24 GHz clinical boards) and FMCW mmWave (60/77 GHz, TI IWR/AWR). Use when Claude needs to parse interleaved I/Q binary, do a Range FFT on FMCW chirps, remove static clutter, pick a subject range bin, extract phase with unwrapping, design HR/BR bandpass filters, pick a peak frequency via PSD, reject the HR second harmonic that often dominates the fundamental, or handle respiration-harmonic leakage on slow breathers. Not for pulse/UWB range gating, MIMO beamforming, Doppler-only gesture radar, arrhythmia detection, or multi-subject source separation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-hop evidence search + structured extraction over enterprise artifact datasets (docs/chats/meetings/PRs/URLs). Strong disambiguation to prevent cross-product leakage; returns JSON-ready entities plus evidence pointers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and resolve BGP oscillation and BGP route leaks in Azure Virtual WAN–style hub-and-spoke topologies (and similar cloud-managed BGP environments). Detect preference cycles, identify valley-free violations, and propose allowed policy-level mitigations while rejecting prohibited fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides React Native performance optimization guidelines for FPS, TTI, bundle size, memory leaks, re-renders, and animations. Applies to tasks involving Hermes optimization, JS thread blocking, bridge overhead, FlashList, native modules, or debugging jank and frame drops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

House style for user-facing documentation — voice, scope, structure, and what to leave out. Use this skill whenever writing, editing, or reviewing anything a user reads to learn how to use a tool — help center articles, getting-started guides, tutorials, feature docs, README usage sections, in-app help, release notes, or FAQ entries. Trigger it even when the request is phrased plainly — "document this feature", "write docs for X", "explain this to users", "write a README for this library", "turn these notes into a guide" — and even when no style guidelines are mentioned. Also use it to review existing docs for tone, bloat, or leaked implementation detail. Do not use it for internal engineering docs, architecture write-ups, RFCs, or code comments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-screen analysis outputs (tables, figures, logs) built on restricted or confidential data for statistical-disclosure-limitation problems before any release. Scans for small cell counts, complementary-suppression gaps, dominance (p-percent / (n,k)), re-identifiable exact counts, PII leakage, and unrounded sensitive statistics; classifies each finding CRITICAL / WARNING / OK and gates on any CRITICAL. Use before depositing or sharing restricted-data results, or when the user says "disclosure check", "SDL scan", "is this output safe to release", "check for small cells", "disclosure avoidance", "pre-screen for the RDC", or "can I export this from the enclave".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever a build emits or repairs .agentlas/routing-card.json — the shared card contract for the single-agent builder, the team builder, and the packager. States what belongs in every field, which fields the hub can actually match on, and which fields silently break matching when a sentence leaks into them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate a prompt universe for schema and provenance completeness, target or campaign contamination, evidence entailment, naturalness, one-concept clarity, architecture consistency, aided status, answer leakage, and semantic duplicates. Use after realistic prompt generation and before human panel selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses macOS system-level slowness, heat and fleet-wide timeouts: high load average, leaked per-session child processes (MCP servers, helpers), fork storms, busy loops. Use when the Mac feels slow or hot, fans spin up, or everything times out at once (电脑发烫/卡顿/负载高/全部超时). Not for single-app bugs, network slowness (use tunnel-doctor), launchd watchdog design (use macos-watchdog), or disk-full (use macos-cleaner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fit a retention curve to observed cohort data and project LTV — computed, not estimated. Use when someone has real cohort retention numbers (month 0, 1, 2…) and asks what lifetime value, lifetime periods, or long-run retention they imply, or whether retention is flattening or leaking. Produces a fitted power curve (parameters, R², retention floor), a 24-36 period projection, and a real .xlsx with live formulas where editing ARPU recalculates LTV — via the bundled zero-dependency script.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users understand the core mechanics of marketplace businesses, from solving the cold start problem to maintaining quality and preventing platform leakage at scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EMC pre-compliance risk analysis for KiCad PCB designs — 18 check categories, 44 rule IDs covering ground planes, decoupling, I/O filtering, switching harmonics, clock routing, differential pair skew, board edge radiation, PDN impedance, return paths, crosstalk, ESD protection, shielding, and magnetic leakage from switching inductors. Produces severity-ranked risk report with pre-compliance test plan. Supports FCC Part 15, CISPR 32, CISPR 25 (automotive), MIL-STD-461G. SPICE-enhanced when available. Use when the user asks about EMC, EMI, radiated/conducted emissions, FCC compliance, CE marking, CISPR, ground plane issues, decoupling strategy, clock routing EMC, switching noise, differential pair skew, or whether their board will pass EMC testing. Also for "will this pass FCC?", "check my EMC", "is my ground plane okay?", "check my decoupling", or "generate an EMC test plan".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guardrails for Codex coding work based on common user complaints. Use when Codex is asked to implement, modify, debug, review, test, or operate on a codebase and should avoid unsafe scope expansion, stale edits, fake completion, brittle edits, shallow debugging, superficial patch-on fixes, one-off special-case code, short-term design choices that hurt maintainability, blindly following incorrect user assumptions, poor dependency choices, generic product or UI output, over-mocked tests, noisy approvals, verbose status reports, or leaking internal reasoning into project artifacts or user-facing UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect hardcoded sensitive data (API keys, access tokens, private keys, passwords, etc.) in publicly accessible code — frontend JavaScript, mobile apps, client-side bundles, and HTML templates. Uses a three-phase approach: recon (find secret candidates), batched verify (confirm real secrets in public code paths, 3 candidates each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/hardcodedsecrets-results.md. Use when asked to find hardcoded secrets, leaked API keys, or exposed credentials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EMC pre-compliance risk analysis for KiCad PCB designs — 18 check categories, 44 rule IDs covering ground planes, decoupling, I/O filtering, switching harmonics, clock routing, differential pair skew, board edge radiation, PDN impedance, return paths, crosstalk, ESD protection, shielding, and magnetic leakage from switching inductors. Produces severity-ranked risk report with pre-compliance test plan. Supports FCC Part 15, CISPR 32, CISPR 25 (automotive), MIL-STD-461G. SPICE-enhanced when available. Use when the user asks about EMC, EMI, radiated/conducted emissions, FCC compliance, CE marking, CISPR, ground plane issues, decoupling strategy, clock routing EMC, switching noise, differential pair skew, or whether their board will pass EMC testing. Also for "will this pass FCC?", "check my EMC", "is my ground plane okay?", "check my decoupling", or "generate an EMC test plan".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an Apple-platform app feels slow, memory grows, battery drains, or ANY performance issue needs diagnosing. Covers memory leaks, profiling, Instruments workflows, retain cycles, optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user mentions battery drain, energy optimization, power consumption audit, or pre-release energy check — timer abuse, polling patterns, continuous location, animation leaks, and background mode misuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to audit SpriteKit game code for common issues — physics bitmask issues, draw call waste, node accumulation, and action leaks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug iOS apps and profile performance using LLDB, the interactive Memory Graph Debugger, and Instruments. Use for crashes, retain-cycle inspection, hangs, build failures, and generic CPU, memory, energy, or network profiling. Use ios-memgraph-analysis for .memgraph capture, leaks CLI ownership paths, or persistent heap growth; use ios-ettrace-performance for ETTrace capture and JSON.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。