2,856 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Add Rcpp or RcppArmadillo integration to an R package for high-performance C++ code. Covers setup, writing C++ functions, RcppExports generation, testing compiled code, and debugging. Use when an R function is too slow and profiling confirms a bottleneck, when you need to interface with existing C/C++ libraries, or when implementing algorithms (loops, recursion, linear algebra) that benefit from compiled code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Angular 18-21 project structure, standalone components vs NgModule, control flow (@if/@for/@switch + *ngIf/*ngFor legacy), decorators, dependency injection (inject() function), lifecycle hooks, pipes, Angular Universal SSR pointer. Use this skill to: - Detect project style (standalone vs NgModule) and apply matching patterns. - Pick correct decorators and DI approach. - Use modern control flow (@if/@for/@switch) in Angular 17+ projects. - Apply `inject()` function over constructor injection where appropriate. - Wire bootstrap correctly (bootstrapApplication for standalone, AppModule for legacy). Do NOT use this skill for: - State management (see angular-state-and-rx). - Routing (see angular-routing). - Forms (see angular-forms). - Testing (see angular-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble the human genetic evidence for and against a target before a programme commits to it — the evidence class that most improves the odds of surviving clinical development. Use this skill to pull gnomAD constraint metrics (LOEUF, pLI, observed/expected) that show whether loss of function is tolerated in people, retrieve GWAS Catalog associations and fine-mapped credible sets for a gene, and read a natural human knockout as a safety readout. Also trigger on gnomAD, LOEUF, pLI, loss-of-function intolerance, mutational constraint, GWAS Catalog, credible set, human knockout, genetic support, or target safety dossier.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose React + Three.js (or any browser canvas) frame stutter by capturing a CDP CPU profile via Playwright instead of guessing from `[perf]` console logs. Use when: (1) frame time is bad but `[perf]` instrumentation doesn't pinpoint the offender, (2) you've spent more than ~30 minutes "fixing" suspects without measuring, (3) hot paths involve animation systems, allocation bursts, or invisible scene-graph traversal, (4) you need self-time per function with line numbers, not aggregate "render slow". The `console.warn` pattern is good for monitoring; CDP is needed for diagnosis. Covers script template, sourcemap setup so minified function names are decoded, and interactive variant where the user drives the interaction and signals stop via `touch /tmp/<flag>`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix Elixir/Erlang AST processing bugs in Grafema beam-analyzer. Use when: (1) Elixir parser returns MODULE node but 0 functions/calls — body nesting issue, (2) Erlang parser crashes with "cannot convert list to string" on OTP 26+ — location format changed from integer to keyword list, (3) pipe operator |> creates spurious CALL nodes instead of desugared function calls — clause ordering bug, (4) multi-module .ex files return only the first module — missing __block__ handler, (5) installing Erlang/Elixir on macOS with outdated Xcode/Clang.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reorganize label-heavy or netlist-like electronic schematics into human-readable functional diagrams with visible local wiring while preserving proven connectivity. Use for schematic readability correction, overlapping wires or symbols, visually floating connectors or support logic, functional-sheet restructuring, bus presentation, layout annotations, or multi-EDA handoff across KiCad, Altium, EasyEDA, EAGLE/Fusion, gEDA/Lepton, SPICE/netlist, and PDF/image sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to use the Appwrite CLI well. Covers when to use appwrite.config.json vs `appwrite client`, pull/push vs one-shot service calls, type-safe SDK and model generation, query flags, CI auth, Cloud regional endpoints, function/site variables, and traps that `--help` will not mention. Does not catalog commands — run `appwrite <command> --help` for flags. Use whenever running `appwrite`, deploying or pulling functions/sites/tables, generating application code from a table schema, initializing or linking a project, scripting Appwrite, or when the user mentions the Appwrite CLI, appwrite.config.json, `appwrite generate`, `appwrite types`, or `appwrite client`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Appwrite Go SDK skill. Use when building server-side Go applications with Appwrite. Covers user management, database/table CRUD, file storage, and functions via API keys. Uses per-service packages and functional options pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master coordinator for the founder. Filters noise, owns cross-functional processes, enforces consistency, routes decisions, and positions outputs for impact so the founder can think clearly. Doesn't own any function owns the space between all of them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Implement BM25 ranking function for e-commerce product search relevance scoring. Use this skill when the user needs to build a text-based product search engine, improve search result relevance, or replace basic TF-IDF with a more robust ranking function — even if they say 'product search ranking', 'search relevance', or 'BM25 implementation'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-activates when analyzing GitHub issues to extract functional requirements, non-functional requirements, acceptance criteria, and user stories.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Business logic flaws are application vulnerabilities where valid functions are abused in unintended ways: price manipulation via hidden field tampering, workflow step-skipping, function call limit bypass (coupon reuse), process timing exploitation (race conditions on balance updates), and request forging via guessable/predictable parameters. Detect using Burp Suite proxy interception, HTTP POST/GET parameter analysis, and misuse-case testing against multi-step workflows. Tools: Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test AI agent systems for tool abuse, unauthorized actions, privilege escalation through tool chaining, and safety bypass via agentic workflows. Use this skill when assessing autonomous AI agents that use tool-calling (function calling, plugins, actions) to interact with external systems. Covers multi-step attack chains, implicit trust exploitation, and capability boundary testing for AI agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review computational protein or gene function predictions and fill PredictionReview YAML files using the COR/CNN/LSP/UNC/PLI/NPI/REP biological-validity taxonomy. Use for ProtNLM, DeepECTF, BioReason/GO-GPT, InterPro2GO, PANTHER/IBA, CLEAN, GloEC, MAPred, ProteinInfer, or other predicted EC/GO annotations, including audits of the evidence and reasoning in existing prediction reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Readable functional patterns — orchestrators, pure functions, named abstractions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Netlify deployment platform — serverless functions, edge functions, redirects, forms, Blobs, build plugins
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automates radare2/rizin analysis through r2pipe to script function enumeration, string and import extraction, and cross-reference queries across samples programmatically. Activates for requests to automate radare2 with r2pipe, script rizin analysis, or batch-extract functions and xrefs from binaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes Go-compiled malware by recovering function names from the pclntab, detecting the Go build/version string, and listing embedded package paths to overcome stripped symbols. Activates for requests to analyze Go malware, recover Go function names, or identify a Golang binary build.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function structure, naming, parameters, shared context, or phase boundaries, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function API shape, flags, dependencies, mutability, construction, or command/function trade-offs, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electromechanical Equipment Assembler — verifying shaft/coupling alignment directly rather than trusting an initial functional test that only confirms the device runs, applying fastener torque to spec with a calibrated tool rather than by feel, routing wire to account for the equipment's full range of motion rather than its static assembled position, or distinguishing electrical from mechanical root cause when a device malfunctions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a licensed acupuncturist — building a TCM pattern-differentiation-based treatment plan, choosing point combinations and needling technique for a presenting complaint, triaging a safety red flag (fainting, suspected pneumothorax, herb-drug interaction), or writing a SOAP note that justifies medical necessity for insurance. US scope-of-practice default (NCCAOM/state licensure). A reasoning aid, not medical advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Application Security Engineer — checking whether an endpoint verifies object-level authorization (not just authentication), running threat modeling at design time rather than deferring security review to the end, triaging a dependency vulnerability by actual reachability rather than CVSS score alone, combining SAST/DAST/SCA tooling to cover their distinct blind spots, or applying context-specific output encoding to untrusted input. Distinct from an information security analyst — this role works inside the SDLC to prevent vulnerabilities before they ship, not detect and respond to intrusions in production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use ENCODE functional genomics data for disease mechanism research. Use when the user wants to connect GWAS variants to regulatory elements, annotate disease-associated loci with functional data, identify therapeutic targets from epigenomic data, build disease regulatory models, cross-reference with clinical trials and drug databases, or conduct any disease-focused, pathology-driven, or clinical variant interpretation workflow. Covers the full pipeline from disease-tissue mapping through GWAS variant annotation, heritability enrichment, cancer epigenomics, drug target identification, and clinical trial cross-referencing. Integrates ENCODE with Open Targets, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and bioRxiv.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。