「owl」の検索結果

Knowledge base from the OUSD(R&E) guidebook Implementing a MOSA in DoD Programs (Feb 2025). Use for the Modular Open Systems Approach as a DoD acquisition + design discipline: the statutory/regulatory basis (10 U.S.C. 4401–4403, FY2017/FY2021 NDAA, DFARS), the five OUSD(R&E) pillars, the plan→modularize→identify→define→standardize interface lifecycle, technical levers (WBS/MIL-STD-881F taxonomy, standards profiling, API-first software, COTS/cybersecurity), MOSA assessment metrics and tools (PART/OAAT/KOSS/SEAM/MAUT), technology-change and DMSMS management, roadmaps, MOSA across the six AAF pathways, and contracting/IP/data-rights mechanics. SCOPE LIMITS: this is U.S. DoD weapon-system acquisition policy, not a general open-architecture or interface-standards reference — it names standards (FACE, OMS, DISR) without reproducing them, is light on detailed engineering of any specific standard, and does not cover the underlying SE processes (use dau-se-guidebook / nasa-npr-7123) or general systems-engineering theory (use sebok).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7123.1D — Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements. Use for the 17 common SE processes (SE Engine), life-cycle reviews and entrance/success criteria, SEMP structure and content, ETA roles and tailoring/customizing rules, Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9), SE work product maturity terminology, contracted project oversight, and MOE/MOP/TPM measurement frameworks. Does not cover NASA programme financial management, human spaceflight medical standards, or software engineering requirements in depth (see NPR 7150.2 for the latter).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from IS-GPS-200 Rev N (NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment / Navigation User Segment Interfaces). Use as a worked ICD/IS exemplar: what an interface specification is, DIST-A and IRN/CCB change control, interface definition vs identification, composite-signal criteria patterns, NAV data as payload families, and time/definition hygiene. Covers Rev N synthesized notes only; does not transcribe Apps II–IV bit fields or PRN/Gold-code tables, and does not replace faa-std-025 preparation rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7150.2D — NASA Software Engineering Requirements. Use for NASA's Agency-wide software-engineering requirements: the software classification scheme (Classes A–F), the Requirements Mapping Matrix and class-driven applicability, tailoring and Technical Authority governance, the SWE-### 'shall' requirements across software management (Ch 3) and the engineering life cycle (Ch 4), the supporting disciplines (configuration management, risk, peer reviews/inspections, measurement, non-conformance — Ch 5), safety-critical and cybersecurity requirements, IV&V applicability, traceability, and the Appendix A definitions. Does not cover detailed software-assurance/safety procedures (see NASA-STD-8739.8), implementation how-to and document content (see NASA-HDBK-2203), the systems-engineering process framework (see NPR 7123.1), or program/project management (see NPR 7120.5).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-STD-882E (DoD System Safety). Use for the system safety process, hazard analysis tasks (PHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA), the risk assessment matrix (severity x probability), software safety criticality, and risk acceptance. US-gov public domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Psychoeducation on depression, anxiety disorders, PTSD, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, ADHD, and borderline personality disorder. Knowledge sharing without diagnosis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sweeps a SharePoint library listing (an export or a listing the agent can reach, with file name, link, review-date column and owner column) for documents past their review date and returns a dated DRAFT review sweep report (Overdue, Due soon, No review date, Summary) plus one ready-to-paste reminder per document owner for the user to send. Never changes metadata, sends a message or invents a document, date or owner. Use when the user asks to "find the documents past their review date", "run the review sweep on the policies library", "which documents are overdue for review", "audit the review dates in this library export" or "draft reminders to owners about stale documents". Do not use for duplicate, conflict and ownership checks across knowledge files, use knowledge-base-hygiene-review instead; for gaps in an engineering deliverables register, use master-document-register-check. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a blameless incident postmortem (summary, impact, timeline, detection and response, contributing factors as candidates for review, action items) from an incident channel export, ticket notes and any alert or change records, with UNKNOWN for every fact the inputs do not contain. Never assigns blame, names a root cause or re-rates severity. Use when the user asks to "write the postmortem for this incident", "build the incident timeline from the chat export", "draft the post-incident review" or "turn this ticket and channel log into an incident report". Do not use for a knowledge article from the resolved ticket, use knowledge-article-drafter instead; for project retrospectives, use lessons-learned-synthesis; for data-breach impact and notification questions, use data-incident-impact-brief. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop black console windows (cmd, PowerShell, Windows Terminal) from flashing and stealing focus on a Windows machine. Use when scheduled tasks, hooks or background scripts pop up consoles: finds all three sources with evidence, silences them reversibly and proves the before and after count. Triggers: /windowless, black windows, console windows popping, windows steal focus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sync CRM knowledge notes in a vault with the live CRM code repositories: pull the read-only repos, detect which changed, and refresh only the affected reverse-engineering notes and the keep/drop/decide note. Triggers: "/crm-sync", "refresh CRM knowledge", "what changed in the CRM code".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

リファクタリング（構造変更）と機能変更（behavior change）が同一 diff に混在していないかを識別し、structural change に対する external behavior preservation の証拠（テスト・型・静的解析）が揃っているかを diff-time で確認する。証拠不足のときは Characterization Test 追加を促すか question とする。DTO/公開 API の破壊的変更検出は api-compatibility、完了主張の反証や抽出リファクタの性能特性退行は refactor-claim-audit、新知識の命名・責務・境界への反映は knowledge-to-code-alignment、投機的抽象化・スコープ逸脱は altitude-generalization / fix-scope-integrity へ委譲する

検査器（linter / ガード / CI ゲート / バリデータ / フィルタ）そのものの検出力が差分で静かに落ちていないか、また新設した検査が実際に検出できることが実証されているかを diff-time で検出する。Check 1 unverified detection reduction（検査器の検出ロジック（正規表現・除外パターン・解決集合・allowlist・baseline）を変更して検出件数が減ったのに、減った 1 件ずつが誤検出であった根拠が示されないまま「誤検出を潰した」「N → M 件に減少」と改善として主張している）、Check 2 unproven guard detection power（新しい検査ロジック・CI ゲート・バリデーションを追加・変更したのに、検出すべき入力を注入して検出されること／検出すべきでない入力で黙ることを示す変異注入の証跡が無く、「追加した」「CI が緑」を検出力の証拠として扱っている）、の 2 Check を対象とする report-only。テスト自身のアサーションが実質何も検証していない構造は test-assertion-effectiveness、レビュー基準・品質ゲートの明示的な弱体化（ルールの削除・閾値の引き下げ・suppression entry 追加・lint ルールの無効化）は review-criteria-integrity、リファクタ完了主張一般の検証は refactor-claim-audit、workflow の permissions と action pin は gha-workflow-security、設定ファイルの構文・型の妥当性は config-json へ委譲する

Build Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for LLM applications with vector databases and semantic search. Use when implementing knowledge-grounded AI, building document Q&A systems, or integrating LLMs with external knowledge bases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand how ideas evolved over time to find old solutions for new problems and avoid repeating past failures

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en data warehousing (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, star schema, slowly changing dimensions)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and run knowledge distillation (on-policy, off-policy, or multi-teacher) from a teacher model to a student model using the Tinker API. Use when the user wants to distill knowledge, compress models, or train a student from a teacher.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) allow a prover to demonstrate Bilgi: a secret (such as a password or private key) without revealing the secret itself. bu skill implements the Schnorr identificati

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementing Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) to continuously monitor multi-cloud environments for misconfigurations, compliance violations, and security risks using Prowler, ScoutSuite, AWS Security Hub, Azure Defender, and GCP Security Command Center.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bu skill details how to conduct cloud security audits using Center for Internet Security benchmarks for AWS, Azure, and GCP. It covers interpreting CIS Foundations Benchmark controls, running automated assessments with tools like Prowler and ScoutSuite, remediating failed controls, and maintaining continuous compliance monitoring against CIS v5 for AWS, v4 for Azure, and v4 for GCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the documents uploaded for the CURRENT task/row (e.g. an Agentic Table row's attached files) via the `unique-cli uploaded-search "<query>"` command, with the same per-turn citation tracking as `unique-cli search` so cited facts render as `<sup>N</sup>` footnotes and clickable reference chips on the Unique platform. ALWAYS use this skill when the user refers to documents they uploaded/attached to this task, or when you need facts from the task's own attached files. These uploaded files are scoped to the chat, NOT to a knowledge-base folder, so they will NEVER appear in `unique-cli search` results no matter the folder or metadata filters. Use `unique-cli search` for the knowledge base and this command for the task's uploaded documents; the two are complementary and citation numbering is shared across them within a turn.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

作業パターンを skill 化すべきか判定する共通スキル。org-retro と org-curate から呼ばれ、 「skill 化推奨 / 候補止まり / curated ノートのまま」の 3 値と根拠を返す。 自動 skill 化はせず、推奨は machine-local な knowledge/skill-candidates.local.md に追記し、 窓口が候補キューが溜まった時点でバッチで人間に問い合わせる二段構え。

skill の棚卸し（廃止候補 / 重複統合 / owner 明記チェック）。 状態ベースで発火する: 候補キュー knowledge/skill-candidates.md の pending が 5 件以上、 または .claude/skills/ 配下の work-skill 数（org-* を除く）が 20 以上になった場合のみ実行。 時間ベースの /loop では起動しない（変化の無い日に raw ログを汚す副作用を避けるため）。

蓄積された生の学び（knowledge/raw/）を整理・統合する。 ディスパッチャーが worker クローズ時の閾値チェック (tools/check_curate_threshold.py) 超過でオンデマンド起動した キュレーターから 1 回だけ呼び出される（常駐 /loop は廃止）。 手動で「知見を整理して」と言われたときにも使う。

Personal App-in-Skill customer-support desk (help desk) that triages incoming support tickets from email, WhatsApp, web chat, contact forms, and WeChat, drafts KB-grounded replies, and proposes actions, then holds every send behind a human approval queue with a pre-send quality gate (support-qa) that outputs SHIP/FIX/BLOCK, plus SLA and CSAT tracking. Use when the user invokes $kelly-support or /kelly-support, mentions 客服 / 工单 / 支持台, a support desk, help desk, customer service, support tickets, ticket triage, a knowledge base or canned macros, SLA / first-response time, CSAT, escalations, or refund requests, wants incoming tickets triaged into a needs_review → approved → done pipeline, agent-drafted replies grounded in a knowledge base and reviewed before sending, refunds and commitments gated behind human approval, or breaching-SLA tickets surfaced. This is the OPERATOR desk (agent + human), distinct from a visitor-facing chat bubble.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。