「proposal」の検索結果

Inspect or exercise the paused gaia curate orchestration scaffold for one source URL. The command currently persists an INITIALIZED run ledger and reports status; its 25 named workflow states and transition methods are a design skeleton, not an implemented automated curation or merge pipeline. Use only for scaffold development, status inspection, or dry-run contract work. For live curation, use gaia-full-pipeline or gaia-consult. Trigger phrases: "/gaia-quick-curate", "inspect gaia curate", "curate scaffold", "quick curate status". For batch/multi-page runs use gaia-curate-dynamic; for crawler branches use gaia-bot-curate; for pending intake proposals use gaia-draft-curate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit essays, reports, literature reviews, dissertations, proposals, and source-backed assignments for high-score academic quality. Use when the user asks whether a paper can get a high grade, wants teacher/rubric feedback addressed, needs a pre-submission review, or needs checks for strict rubric compliance, academic standards, prompt/rubric alignment, argument quality, comparative analysis, evidence hierarchy, table/figure integration, citation specificity, conclusion strength, academic language, source-claim integrity, or evidence boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply source-aware mechanical-engineering judgment to research, analysis, coding, writing, teaching, research identity, and release work. Use for thermal-fluid systems, heat transfer, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, HVAC, energy systems, turbomachinery, piping, multiphase flow, experiments, correlations, CFD, reduced-order models, AI/ML, uncertainty, engineering datasets, literature reviews, citations, manuscripts, reviewer revisions, Overleaf packages, figures, proposals, research software, reproducibility, public releases, engineering teaching materials, or a research-project logo and visual identity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide constructive, evidence-based research mentoring feedback on student manuscripts, proposals, analyses, code, figures, and presentations. Use for advisor-style review that teaches the next improvement without impersonating an advisor or making unsupported scientific judgments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Science Professor — deciding whether a field exercise crosses a weather/safety cancel threshold, building an NSF/EPA proposal budget, normalizing an interdisciplinary tenure case against the right benchmark, checking whether a mixed-methods field project needs IRB review, or handling a politically charged classroom topic without losing academic-freedom footing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer and Information Research Scientist — designing an ablation to attribute an empirical gain, budgeting an NSF CISE proposal against page and content limits, deciding what reproducibility artifacts to release with a paper, screening a draft for mathiness or terminology misuse, or scoping the consent/ethics review needed before running an experiment on real users.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a climate change policy analyst — evaluating a proposed emissions rule's cost-benefit case, comparing carbon-pricing instruments (tax vs. cap-and-trade), drafting regulatory comment letters or legislative issue briefs, or assessing whether a climate proposal survives legal/political feasibility review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an astronomer — calculating exposure time or signal-to-noise for a target, writing the feasibility math for a telescope-time proposal, reducing photometric or spectroscopic data, distinguishing a systematic error floor from statistical noise, or reviewing an observational result for calibration or upper-limit red flags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a professional author — drafting or structurally revising a novel or narrative-nonfiction manuscript, writing a query letter or book proposal, evaluating a publishing contract's royalty and rights terms, or diagnosing why a manuscript is getting rejected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a licensed Architect — programming a building's spatial/functional requirements against a budget, developing a design concept against a zoning/code envelope, evaluating a fee proposal or scope-creep request, resolving a code-compliance conflict between disciplines, or working through a construction-phase change order's cost and schedule impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through structured collaborative documentation creation. Use when user wants to write documentation, update README, create architecture docs, draft proposals, technical specs, decision docs, refactor documentation, create API docs, or document code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive OpenSpec specifications directly from the current project state. Use when the user wants to create or populate main specs by analyzing existing code, documentation, AGENTS.md, GitHub issues, and pull requests — without going through the change/proposal workflow. Ideal for bootstrapping specs on a project that already has working code but no specs yet, or for refreshing specs to match the current implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new OpenSpec change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation. Also use when the user says "openspec propose" or "opsx propose".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Circuit Weaver's exhaustive placement proposal and apply approved SVG coordinates to a real electrically annotated KiCad PCB. Use after schematic generation for placement optimization, official-reference review, interactive SVG editing, strict reference reconciliation, and PCB placement handoff. Do not treat review artifacts as fabrication data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Distinguishing aims, objectives, hypotheses, and milestones — the hierarchy that keeps proposals logically tight.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full nonprofit operational health analysis: validate impact measurement methodology and theory of change, optimize fundraising channels and campaign ROI, audit grant management for compliance and proposal quality, and assess donor retention with churn prediction and stewardship workflows..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze grant management and sponsored research operations including proposal lifecycle tracking, pre-award routing and budget development, post-award expenditure monitoring and burn rate analysis, 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance cost allowability enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a session from what was left - trace saves, briefs, proposals, review reports, issues - and ask what to continue. Never resume or implement automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a concrete technical proposal with evidence and tradeoffs when a decision needs design. No implementation or automatic reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a clear request or an approved brief/proposal. Work solo, make the smallest sufficient change, verify the changed behavior, and stop. Ask before any delegation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle sales objections using tactical empathy. Use when the user says "how do I handle this objection", "prospect said [X]", "they pushed back on price", "they said they're not ready", "how to respond to 'we already have a solution'", "they said 'send me more information'", "objection response", "they went dark after the proposal", "how to handle 'we don't have budget'", or wants to craft a response to a specific sales objection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create or improve a presentation for an academic context — conference papers, seminar talks, thesis defenses, grant briefings, lab meetings, invited lectures, or any presentation where the audience will evaluate reasoning and evidence. Triggers include: 'conference talk', 'seminar slides', 'thesis defense', 'research presentation', 'academic deck', 'academic presentation'. Also triggers when the user asks to 'make slides' in combination with academic content (e.g., 'make slides for my paper on X', 'create a presentation for my dissertation defense', 'build a deck for my grant proposal'). This skill governs CONTENT and STRUCTURE decisions. For the technical work of creating or editing the .pptx file itself, also read the pptx SKILL.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。