「reasoning」の検索結果

Multi-step reasoning engine for complex analysis and systematic problem solving. Use when: (1) Complex debugging scenarios with multiple layers, (2) Architectural analysis and system design, (3) Problems requiring hypothesis testing and validation, (4) Multi-component failure investigation, (5) Performance bottleneck identification. Triggers: "--think", "--think-hard", "--ultrathink", "analyze step by step", "break down this problem", "systematic analysis". IMPORTANT: Do NOT use for simple single-step tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin workflow needs deterministic computation, file processing, repository checks, package inspection, or other work that should be actually executed with host-native Python instead of answered from unverified reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADI-cycle structured reasoning (Abduction-Deduction-Induction-Audit-Decide). Use for complex decisions when multiple hypotheses need to be considered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying information (fact, number, quote, event, statement) against authoritative primary sources, or cross-checking a number via one-level metric decomposition (Z = P × Q). Triggers: "verify X", "is this true", "find the original source", "where is this number from", "two sources disagree", "is it true X never did Y". Covers five scenarios: (1) basic truthfulness check, (2) completeness / out-of-context quoting, (3) one-level reasoning verification, (4) negative-statement handling, (5) multi-source conflict side-by-side output. Dig into whitelisted primary sources only (user-supplied files, official websites & databases, authoritative industry sources); cited reports / charts / datasets must be downloaded and read locally to count as verified — if download is blocked, hand the link to the user. If nothing can be found, plainly state "cannot verify" rather than guessing, patching, or citing secondary paraphrases. Always reply in the user's question language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch and collect independent Codex sessions (gpt-6-luna at high, xhigh or max; gpt-6.1-sol at low to xhigh) for bounded parallel work, from Claude Code or from Codex: one manifest, one detached launcher, one report a session, a drain while it runs, and a retry of the sessions that ended without a report. Owns the Codex transport when another skill sets the questions, as whole-run-investigation does for its lanes. Use when the operator asks for Luna or Sol sessions, a swarm, many sessions, a reasoning effort, a Codex subagent from Claude Code, or a later collection of reports. Tell a request to launch from one to wait and collect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persist AI chat conversations to Neon Postgres with full support for AI SDK message parts including tools, reasoning, and streaming. Uses UUID v7 for chronologically-sortable IDs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantum-resistant, self-learning version control for AI agents with ReasoningBank intelligence and multi-agent coordination

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI agent workflow patterns including ReAct agents, multi-agent systems, loop control, tool orchestration, and autonomous agent architectures. Use when building AI agents, implementing workflows, creating autonomous systems, or when user mentions agents, workflows, ReAct, multi-step reasoning, loop control, agent orchestration, or autonomous AI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for selecting appropriate AI model (sonnet vs haiku) based on task complexity, reasoning requirements, and performance needs. Use when implementing agents or justifying model selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement evaluation frameworks for AI agents. Use when testing agent reasoning quality, building graders, doing error analysis, or establishing regression protection. Framework-agnostic concepts that apply to any SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[00] TnR ABSOLUTE RIGOR — Systemic Verification Doctrine. Forced cognitive exertion for high-stakes investigations. Mandates absolute deconstruction, mathematical proof chains, and ≥95% derived certainty. Zero-tolerance for heuristics or sentiment-based reasoning. Shortcuts are defined as intentional hallucinations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates browser tasks with Browser Use, the open-source library that connects LLM reasoning to Playwright-driven web actions. Useful for navigating sites, filling forms, extracting structured page data, and running agentic browser workflows with screenshots and stateful sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever writing a PR title/description, a commit message body, a code review comment, or an issue — in Hedgehog's own repo or any consuming project. Triggers on "open a PR", "write the PR description", "comment on this PR", "file an issue". Covers writing style (terse, info-dense, Simplified Technical English), the Why/What shape, folding deep reasoning under `<details>`, and the pre-open checklist (CI status, scope, verified claims only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working on or testing imp-server and its HTTP APIs - OpenAI/Anthropic endpoints, /v1/chat/completions, /v1/messages, /v1/responses, SSE streaming, tool calling, json_schema/regex/GBNF constrained decoding, thinking/reasoning_content, cache_control/prefix cache, model loading and swapping, request priority, X-Request-Id, OTLP tracing / traceparent / Jaeger, /metrics, container env (IMP_SET), "server returns 404/garbage", API compliance. Do NOT use for CLI-only inference (imp-cli), kernel work (sm120-cuda-expert), or pure output-quality checks (check-degeneration).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent LLM judge evaluates task completion separately from the executing agent, catching false success claims by reviewing task goal, actions taken, final state, and evidence. Produces PASS/FAIL with confidence score and reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress large context before reasoning to reduce token usage while preserving evidence. Use this whenever the user mentions huge files, long prompts, RAG payloads, prompt caching, expensive sessions, codebase context, chat history compaction, or wants the same answer quality with fewer tokens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trains the HUMAN user's critical thinking through four modes: drill (argument-analysis items with a single defensible answer, judge stance), scene (Socratic exploration of synthetic scenes or user-supplied material, no verdicts on interpretations; includes a configure track — design the information request and verification plan for a decision before any analysis), expedition (guided audit of impossible-tier problems from verified packs), and detective (a runtime-generated multi-layer case worked as an escape room, guide-and-judge stance). Use when the user wants to practice critical thinking, analyze arguments, hunt assumptions, examine bias, train reasoning, or decide what information a decision needs first. Triggers: critical thinking practice, train my thinking, drill, scene, byom, configure, information plan, what would I need to know, spot manipulation tactics, scam literacy, 批判思考練習, 話術辨識, detective, 查案, 破案, 偵探.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used to spawn specialized OpenAI Codex CLI subagents for code review, debugging, architecture analysis, security audits, refactoring, documentation, comparative evidence adjudication, and autonomous /goal runs. It adds each persona through process-local developer instructions while preserving the project's AGENTS.md chain, including during parallel launches. Supports GPT-6-Astra across low, medium, high, xhigh, max, and ultra reasoning with default or priority service tiers, plus GPT-5.6 and GPT-5.5 models. Triggers on 'delegate to Codex', 'Codex Astra', 'Astra subagent', 'Codex subagent', 'code review agent', 'security audit', 'refactor with Codex', 'goal run', 'autonomous goal', 'have Codex weigh this'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Package codebases into LLM-optimized markdown, and run the Deep Think Authority pipeline (context-builder → Deep Think review → structured AUTHORITY → Flash/Antigravity implementation agent). Use when generating project context, preparing Deep Think reviews, or binding a weaker coding agent to a senior reasoning pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask Kimi a read-only free-form question about the current repository. Use for prose explanations, flow tracing, module comparisons, or conceptual reasoning where Codex should delegate the answer to local kimi-code rather than perform implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized prompt-building methodology for content and communications tasks. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for writing, editing, content strategy, copywriting, audience analysis, editorial evaluation, cross-channel adaptation, and persuasion design. Use when building a Claude prompt or system prompt for content creation, editorial workflows, or communications tasks. Trigger on: "build a prompt for writing," "prompt for content strategy," "prompt for copywriting," "prompt for blog posts," "prompt for email sequences," "system prompt for editorial," "prompt for messaging framework," "content brief prompt," "prompt for audience analysis," "prompt that produces better content." Do NOT use for writing content directly — this Skill builds prompts that produce better content. Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for general prompt compilation — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。