「research」の検索結果

Query the OFR (Office of Financial Research) Hedge Fund Monitor API for hedge fund data including SEC Form PF aggregated statistics, CFTC Traders in Financial Futures, FICC Sponsored Repo volumes, and FRB SCOOS dealer financing terms. Access time series data on hedge fund size, leverage, counterparties, liquidity, complexity, and risk management. No API key or registration required. Use when working with hedge fund data, systemic risk monitoring, financial stability research, hedge fund leverage or leverage ratios, counterparty concentration, Form PF statistics, repo market data, or OFR financial research data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to validate a product idea, find pain points, mine demand signals, discover objections, or gather voice-of-customer language from Reddit, social posts, video transcripts, and comments. Produces evidence-backed product research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to research competitors' social media strategy, compare brands or creators, find what content is working in a niche, identify content gaps, or produce a practical social strategy brief from public social data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous NeMo-RL research agent workflow for directed hypothesis testing and open-ended discovery. Guides agents through the full experiment lifecycle: understanding recipes and environments, wiring RL or NeMo-gym runs, launching reproducible baselines and iterations, analyzing results, preserving human oversight, and using git plus TSV logs as the research ledger. Do NOT use for: bug fixes, code review, documentation, refactoring, dependency updates, or single-file changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform multi-round web research on a topic, synthesize the findings, and file structured results into the Obsidian wiki. Use for comprehensive web-sourced research intended to become wiki knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the bundled research knowledge graph for methodology guidance. Routes questions through a 3-tier knowledge base — WHY (research claims), HOW (guidance docs), WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE (domain examples) — plus structured reference documents. Returns research-backed answers grounded in specific claims with practical application to the user's system. Triggers on "/ask", "/ask [question]", "why does my system...", "how should I...".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a topic and grow your knowledge graph. Uses Exa deep researcher, web search, or basic search to investigate topics, files results with full provenance, and chains to processing pipeline. Triggers on "/learn", "/learn [topic]", "research this", "find out about".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

深度调研方法论（8步法）：将模糊主题转化为高质量调研报告。 触发词：/deep-research、深度调研、帮我调研、调研一下、对比分析 注意：如果用户需要的是可视化图谱而非报告，请使用 research-to-diagram skill。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-directed research missions that interleave web research with data experimentation and end on a structured best-effort verdict

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches a topic by breaking it into subtopics, gathering factual information with reasoning, and producing a structured summary with key findings and open questions. Use when the user asks to research, investigate, look up, summarize a topic, or says 'what is known about...' or 'learn about...'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

科研分析策略规划助手。根据用户的科研分析需求，通过调研顶尖期刊/会议论文的分析方法，制定个性化、可落地的最优分析策略。适用于需要制定实验设计、数据分析流程、技术路线的场景；兼容旧名 make-research-plan 的 prompt 触发。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户需要检索候选论文、建立可审计文献池或为下游证据任务准备候选文献时使用。也适用于 research-literature-review 的检索依赖。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户明确要求"从文件/图片/网页/描述中提取综述主题"、"生成主题+关键词+核心问题结构化输出"，或要求使用旧名 get-review-theme skill 时使用。支持文件（PDF/Word/Markdown/Tex）、文件夹、图片、自然语言描述、网页 URL 等多种输入源，自动识别输入类型并提取内容，生成可直接用于 research-literature-review 及其他文献综述技能的结构化输出。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

发现、筛选并长期归档重要研究论文；当用户要求按主题寻找经典、rising star、社区精选、热点或顶会/顶刊论文时使用。采用分层发现策略，调用 research-literature-search 完成其中的关键词/数据库检索，再由本 skill 负责多渠道汇总、idea-level 价值判断、论文类型分类、跨轮次跟踪和论文库归档。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run repeated, measured Git experiments toward a numeric target; keep improvements and revert failures. Use for autonomous optimization or managing an autoresearch run, not one-shot edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Appllama MCP (mcp.appllama.io) well — research real top-grossing mobile apps, their screens, flows, and UI elements, then build from what you learn. Load when the Appllama MCP is connected and the task involves building a mobile app or screen, researching app design patterns, studying onboarding/paywall/feature flows, improving an existing screen, or whenever an appllama_* / search_apps / list_app_screens tool is available. Covers the tool map, pagination, expiring media, and the full build-from-research playbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Role profile — a reviewer who is fact-seeking, bedrock-seeking, honest, and rejecting. Demands that arguments rest on small facts that cannot be wrong (not on stacked assumptions dressed up as foundation), and that deliberately-unclear concepts be quarantined — never leaked into solid layers, never mixed with each other. Catches the failure mode where designs ship after partial grounding: most of the spec researched, the design feels finished, and the unresearched remainder holds the deal-breaker. Invoke with `/pedantic <target>` (e.g. `/pedantic review this design doc`, `/pedantic review the SDK design`, `/pedantic review this PR`). Probes cover logical structure (definitions, assumptions, boundaries, contradictions, unfalsifiability, vague quantifiers, counterexamples), epistemic honesty (researchable vs. discoverable-only-by-doing), bedrock integrity (assumed-bedrock, leaked uncertainty, mixed unclarity), and design pathology (YAGNI, wrong-layer abstraction, unclear responsibility, fragmentation, over-engineering). Use when you want a hard critique of a plan, design doc, technical doc, code change, or PR description — not a copy edit, not a vibe check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize deep research results into markdown report, cover all fields, skip uncertain values.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add field definitions to existing research outline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to analyze competitors' App Store strategy, find keyword gaps, or understand competitive positioning. Also use when the user mentions "competitor analysis", "competitive research", "keyword gap", "what are my competitors doing", or "compare my app to". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a research brief, or assemble evidence for a decision. Also use when comparing options that need a structured, evidence-based verdict rather than an opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Use when the user wants to write blog posts, articles, newsletters, tutorials, case studies, thought leadership pieces, or any long-form content that benefits from research and structured feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when refactoring research code for publication, adding documentation to existing analysis scripts, creating reproducible computational workflows, or preparing code for sharing with collaborators. Transforms research code into publication-ready, reproducible workflows. Adds documentation, implements error handling, creates environment specifications, and ensures computational reproducibility for scientific publications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists researchers with Institutional Review Board (IRB) application tasks, including drafting informed consent documents, reviewing research protocols for compliance, generating application forms, and preparing submission checklists. Use when the user mentions IRB, Instituti...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。