「rust」の検索結果

Azure Identity SDK for Rust authentication. Use for DeveloperToolsCredential, ManagedIdentityCredential, ClientSecretCredential, and token-based authentication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Cosmos DB SDK for Rust (NoSQL API). Use for document CRUD, queries, containers, and globally distributed data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Event Hubs SDK for Rust. Use for sending and receiving events, streaming data ingestion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLMが外部サービスと対話するための適切に設計されたツールを通じて、高品質なMCP (Model Context Protocol) サーバーを作成するためのガイド。Python (FastMCP)、Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK)、Rust (Tokio)で、外部APIやサービスを統合するMCPサーバーを構築する際に使用します。

Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trust scoring, agent discovery, profiling, wallet/identity lookup, contact, dispatch, and metadata reads/writes via 8K4 Protocol (ERC-8004). Use when checking whether an on-chain agent is trustworthy, finding agents for a task, viewing an agent card/profile, fetching validations or wallet/identity records, contacting agents, or reading/updating hosted metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast tokenizers optimized for research and production. Rust-based implementation tokenizes 1GB in <20 seconds. Supports BPE, WordPiece, and Unigram algorithms. Train custom vocabularies, track alignments, handle padding/truncation. Integrates seamlessly with transformers. Use when you need high-performance tokenization or custom tokenizer training.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design security-conscious interfaces that protect users without frustrating them. Use when the user asks about MFA, password UX, breach notifications, trust indicators, secure forms, account recovery, or making security feel safe rather than scary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy a Software-Defined Perimeter using the CSA v2.0 specification with Single Packet Authorization, mutual TLS, and SDP controller/gateway configuration to enforce zero trust network access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configuring Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) to replace traditional VPN with zero trust network access by deploying App Connectors, defining application segments, configuring access policies based on user identity and device posture, and integrating with IdPs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure AWS Verified Access to provide VPN-less zero trust network access to internal applications using identity and device posture verification with Cedar policy language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with multi-source intelligence; or making block/monitor/whitelist decisions. Activates for requests involving VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, MalwareBazaar, MISP, or IOC enrichment pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A high-performance browser automation tool and MCP server written in Rust, featuring headless Chrome control and DOM manipulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full website audit for ICP alignment, messaging clarity, conversion optimization, and trust signals

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure the path from an inbound event (webhook, email, SMS, GitHub comment, file, cron) to an agent spawn in the Port Daddy fleet. Use when wiring trigger sources to agents, reviewing the io-wiring registry, adding a trust/permission gate, hardening output sinks (SSRF/path traversal), scoping tools by provenance, or proving the spawn path is safe against prompt-injection → tool-abuse. Encodes ADR-0093 and the red-team threat model. NOT for generic Coast Guard sandboxing (ADR-0050), the macaroon push-grant gate alone (ADR-0053), or non-fleet code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or fixing a Content Security Policy on a real site, choosing between nonce-based and hash-based CSP, adding strict-dynamic, debugging "Refused to execute inline script" errors, deploying CSP in report-only mode first, configuring report-to / report-uri, or auditing an existing policy for unsafe-inline / unsafe-eval / wildcards. Triggers: "CSP blocks legitimate inline script", strict-dynamic, nonce-{RANDOM}, sha256-{HASH}, object-src none, base-uri none, frame-ancestors, Trusted Types, X-Content-Security-Policy obsolete, report-only vs enforced. NOT for general HTTP security headers (HSTS, COOP/COEP), Trusted Types deep dive, CORS configuration, or building a WAF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a narrow-interval quality signal for a WinDAGs skill that a third party can verify without inspecting model weights or method internals. The mechanism is attribution-kNN over a tamper-evident outcome log (task→skills→accept/reject store), combined with a conformal-prediction calibration certificate that provides a formal coverage guarantee. Thompson/Beta sampling is explicitly rejected as a category error: it produces a selection signal for stationary i.i.d. rewards, not an attestation signal for context-dependent LLM output quality. The resulting bundle — outcome-log Merkle root + conformal threshold + optional TEE guardrail signature — constitutes a "narrow-interval trust" credential: verifiable, bounded, and internals-opaque.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design discovery, directories, and guilds for agent swarms at scale. Use when agents need to find each other on a shared surface: capability indices, yellow-pages directories, whois/phonebook routing, reputation-aware discovery, and guild structures that scope trust. Covers the canonical prior art (FIPA Directory Facilitator, Contract Net, Chord/DHT, DNS-SD/Consul, EigenTrust, Greif's merchant guilds) and the failure modes (read-poverty, Sybil reset, Goodhart on rank, directory staleness, cold-start). Triggers: "agents can't find each other", "who owns this file/skill", "route a question to the right agent", "capability registry", "agent reputation", "guild / federation of fleets". NOT for issuing identities, granting authority, or automatically assigning work from a directory entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

運用者が設定したTeamサーバーの更新を、指定担当のNight Watchに引き継ぎ、既存の更新機構による検証・復旧・完了確認まで進めるスキル。

• Teamを公式mainへ更新したいとき
• 失敗・延期した更新の続行調整
• データベース移行と復旧の調整

OpenClawのIssueやPRを点検するボットを運用し、報告の確認から修正ジョブの作成、権限や検証条件に沿った自動修正・マージまで扱います。

• IssueやPRの点検報告の確認
• 既存の報告から修正ジョブを作成
• GitHub Actionsの失敗調査

公式文書・ソースコード・仕様などの一次資料で疑問を調べ、各主張の出典を添えた調査メモをMarkdownにまとめてリポジトリへ保存するスキル。

• APIの仕様を公式資料で確かめたいとき
• 出典付きの調査メモを残したいとき
• 別の作業中に資料調査を任せたいとき

Next.js 16以降の開発で、起動や変更反映の遅さ、Turbopackとwebpackの使い分けを確認します。キャッシュやproxy.tsの命名も扱うスキルです。

• 開発サーバーの起動の遅さを調べたいとき
• コード変更の反映が遅いときの確認
• Turbopackとwebpackの選択

調査テーマを複数の問いに分け、ウェブ情報の検索と本文の読み込みを通じて、出典・確信度・情報不足を明記したレポートにまとめるスキル。

• 競合や市場動向を調べたいとき
• 導入前に技術を比較したいとき
• 市場規模や成長予測の調査