「section」の検索結果

Structured clarification workflow for underspecified requirements. Use before planning to resolve ambiguities through coverage-based questioning. Records answers in spec clarifications section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Todoist task management, projects, sections, filtering, and bulk operations via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Asana tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): tasks, projects, sections, teams, workspaces. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stage 3 of Clinical ASR Flywheel. Score a NeMo manifest, produce the five-section KER leaderboard (by-ipa_source diagnostic). Not for ASR auth (/riva-asr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Paper or paper PDF to understand: explain a supplied paper or paper/PDF at a selected level while preserving full section coverage and source evidence boundaries. Use when the user says: paper-learning, paper learning, paper-explainer, paper explainer, paper explanation, explain this paper, explain this arxiv paper, paper walkthrough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns an answer into a one-page visual HTML explainer: the model writes a short Markdown draft and the bundled CLI builds one page. Use it proactively and liberally, without being asked, whenever a page would help the reader more than plain text, even if plain text would also work: any explanation of how something works or how parts relate (flow, request path, architecture, code or folder structure, state machine, lifecycle, history); any comparison, trade-off or decision with pros and cons; any diagnosis, review or investigation, especially with several causes or findings to rank; any answer with a table, a numbered or ranked list, steps, branches or several sections; or when the user says "I don't get it / draw it / explain visually / 讲讲原理 / 没看懂 / 画个图". When in doubt, use it: a page is quick and cheap to make. Also for explainer videos ("make a video", "做个视频") and for changing its settings. Skip only for small talk, a trivial one-line answer, or when the user asks for plain text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A playful, joyful, two-color risograph print aesthetic built on a single warm off-white paper surface running through every section

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A modern, graphic, editorial-poster aesthetic — warm and confident — built on alternating cream and burnt orange sections, an amber brand color.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KQL language expertise for writing correct, efficient Kusto Query Language queries. Covers syntax gotchas, join patterns, dynamic types, datetime pitfalls, regex patterns, serialization, memory management, result-size discipline, and advanced functions (geo, vector, graph). USE THIS SKILL whenever writing, debugging, or reviewing KQL queries — even simple ones — because the gotchas section prevents the most common errors that waste tool calls and cause expensive retry cascades. Trigger on: KQL, Kusto, ADX, Azure Data Explorer, Fabric Real-Time Intelligence, EventHouse, Log Analytics, log analysis, data exploration, time series, anomaly detection, summarize, where clause, join, extend, project, let statement, parse operator, extract function, any mention of pipe-forward query syntax.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile a structured literature survey on any AI/ML topic. Agent curates a research bundle (taxonomy + sections + bibliography of real papers) from a public anchor resource, then a chosen LLM generates the survey artifact. Output target is a wiki page (markdown), not a one-off HTML — survey lands in `<wiki>/derived/surveys/<slug>.md` with full bibliography rows in `sources.md`. Provider-agnostic (Anthropic/OpenAI/OpenRouter/Fireworks/custom OpenAI-compat). Use when the user asks for a "survey", "literature review", "lit review", or "deep dive" on a technical topic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select and design a navigation pattern — tabs, drawer, hierarchy, or hub — matched to product structure and user tasks. Use when choosing how users move between sections. For the underlying content structure, use `information-architecture` (ux-strategy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build native UI with the @expo/ui package: real SwiftUI on iOS and Jetpack Compose on Android. Default to @expo/ui for sheets (BottomSheet), pickers, sliders, toggles, menus, and grouped-form sections — do NOT reach for Reanimated, @gorhom/bottom-sheet, or RN built-in Picker/Switch; use @expo/ui instead. Fall back to RN built-ins only when @expo/ui is missing the component. NOTE: @expo/ui List renders native grouped rows like an iOS Settings screen — it is NOT a virtualized list; use FlatList/FlashList for large datasets. Covers universal components (Host, Column, Row, Button, Text, List, BottomSheet, FieldGroup, Switch, Slider, Picker, Menu), drop-in replacements for RN community libraries, and platform-specific SwiftUI/Jetpack Compose trees. Not for Expo Router navigation, Reanimated, or data fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify the approved handoff of clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use when configuring or auditing Abridge-to-Epic documentation flow. Trigger with "verify the Abridge Epic handoff".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous, defensible email-spoofability verdict and SPF supply-chain risk analysis computed from published DNS alone. Deepens the record-level SPF/DMARC/DKIM/BIMI/MTA-STS/DNSSEC fetch recipes in the offensive-osint arsenal (§16.14) with the reasoning that section doesn't do: a priority-ordered composite verdict for whether an attacker can actually land header-From-spoofed mail in an inbox, and by which vector (exact-domain vs subdomain) — grounded in the single most-misunderstood distinction in email security: the envelope MAIL FROM that SPF authenticates vs the visible header From: that only DMARC governs. Explains precisely why SPF -all/~all alone is NOT spoof-proof without DMARC enforcement, and why SPF +all bypasses DMARC even under p=reject pct=100. Covers RFC 7208 §4.6.4's 10-DNS-lookup / 2-void-lookup PermError fail-open condition with a runnable stdlib-only lookup-counter script, plus the SPF-include-takeover supply-chain vector (an attacker re-registering a dead include inherits SPF-pass authority over the victim domain) with strict transient-vs-NXDOMAIN discrimination discipline so a temporary SERVFAIL is never mistaken for a takeover lead. Fully passive: DNS TXT reads only, no mail sent, no RCPT TO probe, no API keys. Use when auditing a domain's real spoofing resistance (not just its published records), explaining to a client why 'we have SPF -all' does not mean they're covered, investigating an SPF PermError or an unusually long include chain, evaluating a dead SPF include as a takeover lead, or writing a defensible spoofability finding for a deliverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates detailed, sectionized implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft, revise, and audit scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the seven principles of ethical persuasion (reciprocity, commitment, social proof, authority, liking, scarcity, unity) to product design, copy, and sales. Use when the user mentions "social proof", "persuasive copy", "why users dont convert", "ethical persuasion", "reciprocity", "scarcity tactics", "commitment and consistency", "shared identity", "in-group", "make my copy more persuasive", "increase trust", or "get more people to say yes". Also trigger when designing testimonial sections, crafting urgency messaging, or improving trust signals on landing pages. Covers the principles, when each applies, and ethical limits. For deal negotiation tactics, see negotiation. For viral word-of-mouth, see contagious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect keyword cannibalization across blog posts by extracting primary keywords from titles and headings, clustering semantically similar targets, and flagging posts competing for the same search intent. Supports local-only mode (grep-based) and DataForSEO API mode (Page Intersection endpoint at ~$0.01/call). Outputs severity-scored report with merge or differentiate recommendations. Use when user says "cannibalization", "keyword overlap", "competing pages", "duplicate keywords", "cannibalize".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write new blog articles from scratch optimized for Google rankings and AI citations. Generates full articles with template selection, answer-first formatting, Key Takeaways summary box, information gain markers, evidence-backed explanations, sourced statistics, Pixabay/Unsplash images, built-in SVG chart generation, optional FAQ sections, internal linking zones, and proper heading hierarchy. Supports MDX, markdown, and HTML output. Use when user says "write blog", "new blog post", "create article", "write about", "draft blog", "generate blog post".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate detailed content briefs for blog posts with target keywords, content outlines, competitive analysis, recommended statistics, image and chart suggestions, word count targets, internal linking architecture, template recommendations (12 types), TL;DR drafts, evidence-backed section planning, information gain prompts, and multi-channel distribution plans. Briefs are optimized for Google rankings and AI citation visibility as part of SEO. Use when user says "content brief", "blog brief", "write brief", "SEO brief", "article brief", or "content requirements".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write new blog articles from scratch optimized for Google rankings and AI citations. Generates full articles with template selection, answer-first formatting, Key Takeaways summary box, information gain markers, citation capsules, sourced statistics, Pixabay/Unsplash images, built-in SVG chart generation, optional FAQ sections, internal linking zones, and proper heading hierarchy. Supports MDX, markdown, and HTML output. Use when user says "write blog", "new blog post", "create article", "write about", "draft blog", "generate blog post".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add another file (resource) to an EXISTING dataset in a PortalJS portal — a data dictionary, methodology, or an additional data file. Turns a single-file dataset into a multi-resource one; the showcase renders a section per resource. Use when a dataset needs a second file, such as a data dictionary, methodology doc, or an additional period's data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。