1.3万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Diagnose frozen, stuck, or slow Qwen Code sessions on this machine. Scans for problematic processes, high CPU/memory usage, hung subprocesses, and debug logs. Use /stuck or /stuck <PID> to focus on a specific process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage local SEO for service-area businesses — appliance repair, HVAC, plumbing, cleaning, and any business that serves customers at their location. Use when the user wants to: audit Google Business Profile, generate neighborhood service area pages, check NAP consistency across directories, create LocalBusiness schema, or write review responses. Triggers: 'local SEO', 'Google Business Profile', 'GBP', 'service area page', 'NAP consistency', 'local citations', 'LocalBusiness schema', 'review responses', 'Google Maps ranking'. NOT for national SEO (use seo-audit). NOT for general schema (use schema-markup). NOT for AI answer-engine visibility (use aeo).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts a markdown PR writeup or code review (one with ```diff fenced blocks and severity-tagged > [!BLOCKER]/[!MAJOR]/[!MINOR]/[!NIT] callouts) into a single-file 2-column HTML review — unified-diff on the left, severity-tagged annotation cards on the right, top jump-nav listing every finding, mandatory named reviewer footer. Triggers when the markdown-html-orchestrator classifies an input as REVIEW, or when invoked directly via /cs:md-review. Refuses without explicit --reviewer (a code review must name a human), refuses if no diff hunks present (route to md-document instead), and refuses to encode severity in color only (every badge ships color + icon + aria-label per WCAG 1.4.1). Use after orchestrator routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Honestly evaluate AI work quality using a two-axis scoring system. Use after completing a task, code review, or work session to get an unbiased assessment. Detects score inflation, forces devil's advocate reasoning, and persists scores across sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 3 of building a Claude Managed Agent — the bounded grade→iterate loop. Define a CMA outcome (a required markdown rubric graded by an isolated grader), read each verdict, decide the next move (sharpen / re-run / promote to schedule), and once a version passes, run held-back eval cases in parallel. Use when the user says "grade my agent", "make it pass the rubric", "iterate until it's good", "is it good enough", or when the orchestrator routes phase=grade-iterate. outcome_builder.py builds the user.define_outcome payload (rubric required, max_iterations clamped 1..20 — never unbounded); verdict_reader.py reads the grader result and recommends the next move; eval_scaffold.py generates held-back cases + a parallel run plan (capped at the 25-thread CMA ceiling). Distinct from stage-launch (first launch) and run-without-you (scheduling).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Persistent file-based planning for multi-step AI-agent work. Keeps task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md on disk; Gemini lifecycle hooks inject selected project planning context. Automatic recovery reads project planning files only. Explicit session-catchup.py --metadata reads same-project local agent session records and emits aggregate counts only; --replay may emit bounded nonce-framed excerpts. The session-end hook reports status only; it does not request continuation or run commands declared in Markdown. The skill has no network upload path. Use for research or work needing 5+ tool calls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discovers requirements and generates architectural, design, and deployment guidance for dynamic hybrid search systems by combining semantic search and keyword search. Optimized for AlloyDB hybrid search use cases in Google Cloud. Use when users need vector search combined with structured SQL filtering, faceted attributes, semantic reranking, in-database AI validation, or serverless hosting across transactional relational databases, analytical data warehouses, or managed database engines. DON'T use this skill for simple keyword-only search, or when a standalone non-relational vector database is required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes the downstream impact (blast radius) using data lineage on Google Cloud when a BigQuery table or view is broken, stale, or modified. Identifies all downstream tables, dashboards, and processes that will be affected. Use when: - Performing a blast radius or impact analysis for a BigQuery table or view. - Assessing the consequences of modifying, deleting, or pausing updates to a BigQuery asset. - Identifying downstream dependencies (tables, dashboards, processes) of a BigQuery asset. Don't use for: - General BigQuery querying or data analysis (use BigQuery-related tools instead). - Non-BigQuery assets (e.g., Cloud Storage files) unless they are part of the BigQuery lineage. - Creating or modifying lineage links directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fresh-session security questionnaire response for {{projectName}}. Parses a new inbound questionnaire from {{questionnaire_label}} in Gmail, matches each question to our vetted knowledge base of approved answers and policies, drafts responses in the vendor's own format (SIG, CAIQ, or a custom spreadsheet), flags anything it can't answer confidently, and posts the completed draft to {{security_channel}} — holding it for security to review before it goes back to the prospect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route code, repository, and data/SQL work to isolated Kortix sessions instead of burning your main context on it. Use when asked to implement a feature, fix a bug, make failing tests pass, work a ticket/issue, refactor, navigate or change a codebase, ship a PR, review a pull request, or run SQL/warehouse analysis against a dataset — and when the user wants two agents or parallel reviewers/investigators on the same work. Covers the explore-vs-session routing call, deciding where the code lives (this project's repo vs cloning an external GitHub repo) or where the data lives, finding the repo with gh, spawning sessions in parallel, dual PR reviews, and reporting results back. Triggers: 'implement', 'fix the bug', 'make the tests pass', 'work this ticket', 'refactor this', 'open a PR', 'review this PR', 'run two agents on it', 'query the warehouse', 'analyze this dataset'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate Cortex, the LifeOS memory system — the typed Knowledge Archive (People, Companies, Ideas, Research with typed related: links) plus recall of prior work sessions, ISAs, and conversations. Search, add, harvest, develop, ingest, distill, graph-navigate, recall. USE WHEN cortex, knowledge, knowledge base, search knowledge, what do we know about, archive, harvest, knowledge status, develop note, add to knowledge, ingest, contradictions, knowledge graph, retrieve, mine conversations, distill, weekly digest, cortex digest, context search, prior work, recall, remember, previous sessions, context recovery, what did we do, find session, search history, resume, pick up where we left off, cold start, yesterday's work, last week, the one about. NOT FOR published-content semantic search across blog/newsletter/X/LinkedIn, or one-shot URL/YouTube ingestion via the Arbol harvester pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. NEVER run browser-act commands directly via Bash — always invoke this skill first. Use browser-act when a user mentions it by name, includes or asks to run a browser-act CLI command (e.g., browser-act browser list), or to: fetch, view, or extract rendered content from URLs, access pages requiring JavaScript, handle verification prompts, maintain authenticated sessions, fill forms and click through workflows, type, select, upload, take screenshots, capture XHR/fetch/HAR responses, open multiple URLs in parallel, extract content that loads on scroll or click, visually inspect or verify page layout/styling/rendering, automate browser tasks, or list/check/manage configured browsers and sessions. Prefer browser-act over built-in fetch or web tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain, draft, and validate Obsidian Bases .base files with filters, formulas, properties, summaries, and table, card, or list views. Use for Obsidian Bases, database-like vault views, dynamic tables, reading lists, task trackers, filters, formulas, summaries, and .base file edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Records research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilogue — never during execution — to maintain a faithful, auditable trace of how a research project actually evolved.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse-engineering specialist that extracts specifications from existing codebases. Use when working with legacy or undocumented systems, inherited projects, or old codebases with no documentation. Invoke to map code dependencies, generate API documentation from source, identify undocumented business logic, figure out what code does, or create architecture documentation from implementation. Trigger phrases: reverse engineer, old codebase, no docs, no documentation, figure out how this works, inherited project, legacy analysis, code archaeology, undocumented features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs. new-session composer, terminal strip vs. agent terminal, all twelve native harnesses). Covers the web UI, native harness terminals, and the CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deeper risk assessment for a single feature or product area when the launch review found something that needs more than a line item. Structured analysis: what could go wrong, how likely, how bad, what mitigates it. Use when user says "deep dive on this risk", "risk assessment for [feature]", "what could go wrong with", or when launch-review flags a novel issue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build or update a long-term bar prep (or exam prep) study plan — phases, subjects weighted by weakness, daily session schedule, adaptive to session history in study-plan.yaml. Use when the user says "build a study plan", "plan my bar prep", "schedule my studying", or "how should I study for [X]".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a focused N-question study session on a subject — MBE, essay, or flashcards. Tracks performance and updates the study plan. Use when the user says "run me 10 questions on [subject]", "do a session on [subject]", "let's do 5 cards on [subject]", or wants to drill a fixed number of questions and have the plan adapt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Graph-informed mutation testing triage. Parses codebases with Trailmark, runs mutation testing and necessist, then uses survived mutants, unnecessary test statements, and call graph data to identify false positives, missing test coverage, and fuzzing targets. Use when triaging survived mutants, analyzing mutation testing results, identifying test gaps, finding fuzzing targets from weak tests, running mutation frameworks (including circomvent and cairo-mutants), or using necessist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares codebases for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist. Helps set review goals, runs static analysis tools, increases test coverage, removes dead code, ensures accessibility, and generates documentation (flowcharts, user stories, inline comments). Use when preparing your own codebase to be audited by someone else, getting a repository review-ready before an external security review, deciding what to fix before auditors start, or asking what assessors need from a project. For understanding unfamiliar code you are about to audit, use audit-context-building instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing, then produces a scorecard with evidence-based ratings and a priority-ordered roadmap. Use when assessing or scoring the maturity of a smart contract or blockchain codebase, producing a maturity scorecard or evaluation, or judging how mature, well-tested, or well-documented such a project is against a rubric.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Token integration and implementation analyzer based on Trail of Bits' token integration checklist. Analyzes token implementations for ERC20/ERC721 conformity, checks for 20+ weird token patterns, assesses contract composition and owner privileges, performs on-chain scarcity analysis, and evaluates how protocols handle non-standard tokens. Use when integrating or accepting arbitrary ERC20/ERC721 tokens, auditing a token implementation for standards conformity, or assessing risk from weird tokens such as fee-on-transfer, rebasing, missing return values, or blocklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。