2,777 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a structured ransomware incident response playbook aligned with the CISA StopRansomware Guide and NIST Cybersecurity Framework, covering preparation, detection, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident phases with actionable checklists. Use when creating or updating a ransomware playbook, running a CISA-aligned readiness assessment, or validating response steps during a tabletop exercise.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and documents structured incident response playbooks with step-by-step procedures per incident type, decision trees, escalation criteria, RACI matrices, and SOAR platform integration, aligned to NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL. Use when creating or maturing an IR program, documenting response runbooks for a new incident type, or designing SOAR playbooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build threat actor profiles by collecting OSINT from vendor reports, paste sites, dark web forums, social media, and code repos, correlating indicators, mapping adversary infrastructure with tools like Maltego and SpiderFoot, and producing structured dossiers of motivations, capabilities, infrastructure, and TTPs. Use when performing attribution or building an adversary dossier from open-source intelligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build structured communication templates for malware incidents (ransomware, wiper, trojan, worm), covering internal stakeholder notifications, executive briefings, technical advisories for IT teams, customer notifications, and regulatory disclosures, with severity-based escalation procedures. Use when drafting or standardizing incident communications and notification workflows for a malware outbreak.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safely monitor ransomware group Tor-hosted data leak sites (DLS) to collect and extract structured victim posting data, track group activity trends over time, and produce sector- and geography-specific ransomware risk assessments. Use when performing threat intelligence gathering on active ransomware groups or building proactive defense reporting from double-extortion leak-site activity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform comprehensive forensic analysis of raw (dd), E01, or AFF disk images with Autopsy and The Sleuth Kit, recovering deleted files, examining metadata and embedded artifacts, keyword searching, and building investigation timelines with visual reports. Use for structured analysis of a forensic disk image or when stakeholders need visual reports from evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Persistent SEO workflow for Claude Code — run a technical SEO audit, build a hub-and-spoke keyword strategy, write page-type-aware content briefs, and draft SEO-optimized articles, persisting every artifact to a .seoagent/ workspace so the work compounds across sessions. Use when auditing a site's technical SEO, planning a keyword/content strategy, writing content briefs, drafting SEO articles with structured data, or resuming SEO work started in a previous session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for GRPO/RL fine-tuning with TRL for reasoning and task-specific model training
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep research skill powered by NotebookLM MCP. Conducts structured multi-source research (market analysis, competitive intel, trend analysis, prospect research) using Google NotebookLM as the research engine, then delivers formatted briefs and optional studio artifacts (slides, audio podcasts, videos, infographics, reports, mind maps).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a structured code review using change detection and impact
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a PR or branch diff using the knowledge graph for full structural context. Outputs a structured review with blast-radius analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refresh installed NanoClaw channel and provider payloads from their registry branches with fork-safe remote resolution and a blocking structured result. Use after updating NanoClaw or whenever installed channel/provider code may be stale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep-research a topic end to end and produce a permanent, reusable knowledge asset: archive every primary source verbatim (gated by the user's privacy/retention posture), write one 1:1 summary per source, then synthesize a single self-contained compendium page. Depth is a dial (base synthesis → grounded primaries → books + counter-canon → saturation), each level an idempotent superset of the one below. Distinct from data-research (structured trackers) and perplexity-research (web deltas): this produces prose knowledge synthesis backed by an archived source corpus.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trace one idea's evolution through the brain: first mention, best articulation, related concepts, reversals, contradictions, abandoned branches, and the current live version. Use for single-idea conceptual lineage, not broad concept-map synthesis or structured entity metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform raw article text dumps in the brain into structured pages with executive summary, verbatim quotes, key insights, why-it-matters, and cross-references. Replaces walls-of-text with quotable, actionable brain pages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Everything In Its Right Place. The universal post-work organizer. After any significant work session, EIIRP runs a 7-phase audit: (1) inventory every output, (2) walk taxonomy to decide where each lands, (3) check schema-pack consistency against the brain's actual shape, (4) file enriched brain pages, (5) audit the skill graph for DRY+MECE, (6) verify resolvability, (7) report. Named after the Radiohead song. Nothing produced during significant work lives only in chat — knowledge becomes permanent, patterns become reusable. Also carries the always-on auto-fire gate: when >=500 words of structured analysis on a user-shared document is about to be delivered, file the brain page first, then deliver the analysis with the link in that same reply.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality gate via second model. Spawn a different AI model to review work before committing. Includes refusal routing: if one model refuses, switch silently to the next. Extended in v0.25.1 with structured review-mode gating (when to invoke vs not) and a Codex code-review handoff for the diff-review case.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a doc, guide, README, or block of prose against the good-docs-writing style guide and report violations. Use when the user asks to review, critique, lint, or check the voice and tone of documentation or text. Produces a structured findings report (file:line, rule violated, offending text, suggested rewrite) and does NOT edit files unless explicitly asked.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds end-to-end hiring packets — job post, structured interview guide with scoring rubric, and offer letter template — from a hiring brief. Triggers on: "help me hire", "we're hiring for", "write a job post", "job description", "JD", "open role", "create a job ad", "interview questions", "scoring rubric", "draft an offer letter", "send an offer", "make a hiring packet", or any request to recruit for a position. When in doubt, trigger — covers the full hiring workflow from job post through DocuSign envelope creation via browser. Does NOT screen or rank applicants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance and track resulting action items. Use when preparing for contract negotiations, board meetings, compliance reviews, or any meeting where legal context, background research, or action tracking is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create structured interview plans with competency-based questions and scorecards. Trigger with "interview plan for", "interview questions for", "how should we interview", "scorecard for", or when the user is preparing to interview candidates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize user research from interviews, surveys, and feedback into structured insights. Use when you have a pile of interview notes, survey responses, or support tickets to make sense of, need to extract themes and rank findings by frequency and impact, or want to turn raw feedback into roadmap recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。