「summaries」の検索結果

Use when working with Aws Xray — aWS X-Ray trace analysis, service map generation, fault and error analysis, sampling rule management, and latency investigation. Covers trace summaries, segment analysis, annotation-based filtering, and group configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

YouTube transcripts to summaries, threads, blogs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teams meeting summaries, job replay, Graph subscriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

To address this, we propose to recursively generate summaries/ memory using large language models (L

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for interpreting ResolveProjectReferences time in MSBuild performance summaries. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. Activate when ResolveProjectReferences appears as the most expensive target and developers are trying to optimize it directly. Explains that the reported time includes wait time for dependent project builds and is misleading. Guides users to focus on task self-time instead. Do not activate for general build performance -- use build-perf-diagnostics instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose MSBuild build performance bottlenecks using binary log analysis. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: identifying why builds are slow by analyzing binlog performance summaries, detecting ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) taking >5s, Roslyn analyzers consuming >30% of Csc time, single targets dominating >50% of build time, node utilization below 80%, excessive Copy tasks, NuGet restore running every build. Covers timeline analysis, Target/Task Performance Summary interpretation, and 7 common bottleneck categories. Use after build-perf-baseline has established measurements. DO NOT USE FOR: establishing initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline first), fixing incremental build issues (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (overview, errors, search, items, properties); falls back to dotnet msbuild binlog replay + grep/cat when the MCP is unavailable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use on ANY coding task: writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code, and choosing libraries or dependencies. Also use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", or complains about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies. Do NOT use for non-coding requests (general knowledge, prose, translation, summaries, recipes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark Xcode clean and incremental builds with repeatable inputs, timing summaries, and timestamped `.build-benchmark/` artifacts. Use when a developer wants a baseline, wants to compare before and after changes, asks to measure build performance, mentions build times, build duration, how long builds take, or wants to know if builds got faster or slower.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Swift and mixed-language compile hotspots using build timing summaries and Swift frontend diagnostics, then produce a recommend-first source-level optimization plan. Use when a developer reports slow compilation, type-checking warnings, expensive clean-build compile phases, long CompileSwiftSources tasks, warn-long-function-bodies output, or wants to speed up Swift type checking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing skill for freelancers and independent consultants. Covers project proposals, bids, client emails, and scope summaries. Leads with the client's problem, not the consultant's background.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform audio recordings into professional Markdown documentation with intelligent summaries using LLM integration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

YouTube transcripts to summaries, threads, blogs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate HTML reports and structured metrics from model evaluation results. Creates publication-ready reports with embedded outputs (images, audio, charts) and metrics.json for cross-model comparison. Use when generating reports, writing metrics, creating evaluation summaries, or formatting benchmark results. Triggers on "generate report", "write metrics", "create report", "evaluation summary", "benchmark results", "format results".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Financial advisor for GreenEnergyFL — tracks job finances, bills, vendor payments, cash flow, and overdue invoices. Use this skill whenever the user asks about money, payments, invoices, bills, job costs, what's owed, what's coming in, cash flow, overdue accounts, financial summaries, or anything related to GreenEnergyFL's finances. Trigger even if the user just says "check the bills", "what do we owe", "who hasn't paid", "how are we doing financially", or "show me the jobs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate AI observability evaluations of both types — `hog` (deterministic code-based) and `llm_judge` (LLM-prompt-based). Find existing evaluations, inspect their configuration, run them against specific generations, query individual pass/fail results, and generate AI-powered summaries of patterns across many runs. Use when the user asks to debug why an evaluation is failing, surface common failure modes, compare results across filters, dry-run a Hog evaluator, prototype a new LLM-judge prompt, or manage the evaluation lifecycle (create, update, enable/disable, delete).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build forest plots (HR, OR, RR, beta-coefficient summaries with CIs) and funnel plots (meta-analysis publication-bias diagnostics) using forestplot, metafor, ggforest, and MendelianRandomization with proper axis-scaling, summary-diamond placement, subgroup nesting, and Egger / trim-and-fill asymmetry tests. Use when summarizing effects across subgroups, trials, or instruments — meta-analysis, Mendelian randomization, subgroup HRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chains a somatic (tumor-normal) SNV/indel and structural-variant pipeline end to end with GATK Mutect2 (or Strelka2), wiring the somatic-specific machinery - panel-of-normals and gnomAD germline-resource priors, GetPileupSummaries/CalculateContamination, and LearnReadOrientationModel FFPE/oxoG orientation-bias filtering fed into FilterMutectCalls. Use when calling somatic mutations from a tumor-normal pair (or tumor-only with PoN caveats), deciding which artifact filter removes which class of false positive, reasoning about VAF/purity/ploidy and clonal-vs-subclonal detection, adding somatic SV/CNV or TMB/MSI/signatures, or routing variants to AMP/ASCO/CAP tier and oncogenicity interpretation (never germline ACMG).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query aggregate Langfuse cost, volume, latency, and model telemetry efficiently with Metrics API v2. Use for dashboards, rollout checks, usage summaries, and cost or latency comparisons; use Observations API v2 instead when individual rows are actually required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract timekeeper entries, disbursements, matter references, and billing summaries from law firm invoices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WHAT: Generate Codex-authored HTML insights from local Codex sessions and telemetry. WHEN: Use when the user asks for Codex usage analytics, workflow patterns, session summaries, prompting help, or recommendations for improving how they use Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visualises RNA-modification data with transcript-feature metagene plots (Guitar GuitarPlot with 5'UTR / CDS / 3'UTR scaling; MetaPlotR; deepTools `computeMatrix scale-regions`), peak-centred heatmaps (ComplexHeatmap; deepTools plotHeatmap), IP-vs-input paired browser tracks (bigWig of log2 IP/input via deepTools `bamCompare`; ggcoverage; pyGenomeTracks; Gviz; IGV / UCSC track hubs), DRACH sequence-logo plots (ggseqlogo; MEME), 5'UTR / CDS / 3'UTR stacked-bar feature-distribution summaries, and volcano / MA plots for differential modification. Establishes stop-codon enrichment in the metagene plot as the biological QC anchor for any MeRIP dataset (Dominissini 2012 *Nature* 485:201; Meyer 2012 *Cell* 149:1635 — concurrent founding papers from different labs both showed this independently). Use when producing the canonical metagene plot with stop-codon enrichment as a QC anchor, building paired IP/input genome-browser tracks at single-locus resolution, plotting peak-centred heatmaps clustered by condition, summarising peak distribution across transcript features for figure 1, generating DRACH motif logos as sanity checks on the peak set, rendering volcano plots of differential m6A, or reproducing the Dominissini 2012 / Meyer 2012 stop-codon enrichment plot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build forest plots (HR, OR, RR, beta-coefficient summaries with CIs) and funnel plots (meta-analysis publication-bias diagnostics) using forestplot, metafor, ggforest, and MendelianRandomization with proper axis-scaling, summary-diamond placement, subgroup nesting, and Egger / trim-and-fill asymmetry tests. Use when summarizing effects across subgroups, trials, or instruments — meta-analysis, Mendelian randomization, subgroup HRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。