「threat」の検索結果

Security best practices and vulnerability prevention for Golang — injection (SQL, command, XSS), cryptography, path traversal, SSRF and HTTP security headers, cookies, secrets management, memory safety, PII in logs, STRIDE/DREAD threat modeling, plus `gosec` SAST, race detection, and fuzz testing. Apply when writing, reviewing, or auditing Go code for security, or when touching crypto, file or network I/O, secrets, user input, or authentication. Not for non-exploitable defensive bugs such as nil panics or slice aliasing (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-safety` skill), dependency vulnerability scanning with govulncheck (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-management` skill), or wiring security scanners into CI pipelines (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compose IRQL (Incident Response Query Language) queries for Kusto cybersecurity investigations. Translates natural language hunting questions into composable IRQL pipelines using Get_*, Extract_*, and Enrich_* functions. WHEN: IRQL query, security hunt, threat hunting KQL, incident response query, compose hunting pipeline, failed logins, phishing investigation, lateral movement, process execution, file creation events.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds, configures, debugs, and optimizes AWS observability - operator-symptom questions and detecting Omni vs classic CloudWatch. CloudWatch on an already-reporting service: Log Insights, metric/composite/anomaly alarms, custom metrics/EMF, dashboards, X-Ray/ADOT tracing, canaries, CloudTrail, Dynamic Instrumentation (live breakpoints/snapshots), the Application Signals service map, and fleet health views. CloudWatch Omni on an existing Space: SQL over logs and traces, PromQL over metrics, Omni dashboards, Omni alerts, context graph for root cause, programmatic/IaC access (API/SDK/CLI/CloudFormation), driving Omni from a coding agent or skills, and evaluating AI agent quality from traces - on-demand and online scoring of live traffic, readback, custom evaluators. For first-time setup - creating an Omni Space, granting access, ingestion, or ADOT instrumentation for Application Signals (ServiceEvents, CI/CD metadata) or Omni - use setting-up-cloudwatch-observability. Not for app logging or threat detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Terminal security analysis for shell environments. This skill should be used when checking commands for supply-chain attacks before execution, scanning repositories for hidden content or config poisoning, scoring URLs for homograph attacks, setting up AI tool protection, inspecting Python package artifacts, governing untrusted tasks or Web3 commands, auditing browser extensions, creating provenance receipts, downloading and executing scripts safely, investigating why tirith blocked a command, managing trusted patterns, running security audits, configuring MCP gateway proxies, or working with threat intelligence databases. Also use when the user mentions "tirith", "pipe-to-shell", "homograph", "ANSI injection", "zero-width", "punycode", "terminal security", "shell hook", "cloaking detection", "supply chain attack", "bidi override", "invisible unicode", or "config poisoning". Even if the user does not explicitly name tirith, use this skill when they ask about protecting shell environments, intercepting dangerous commands, or hardening AI agent tool execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive security engineering skill for application security, penetration testing, security architecture, and compliance auditing. Includes security assessment tools, threat modeling, crypto implementation, and security automation. Use when designing security architecture, conducting penetration tests, implementing cryptography, or performing security audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exact detection thresholds for identifying malicious network patterns including port scans, DoS attacks, and beaconing behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AIDefence security layer with prompt injection blocking, input validation, sandboxed execution, output sanitization, and STRIDE threat modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert security auditor specializing in DevSecOps, comprehensive cybersecurity, and compliance frameworks. Masters vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, secure authentication (OAuth2/OIDC), OWASP standards, cloud security, and security automation. Handles DevSecOps integration, compliance (GDPR/HIPAA/SOC2), and incident response. Use PROACTIVELY for security audits, DevSecOps, or compliance implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compose IRQL (Incident Response Query Language) queries for Kusto cybersecurity investigations. Translates natural language hunting questions into composable IRQL pipelines using Get_*, Extract_*, and Enrich_* functions. WHEN: IRQL query, security hunt, threat hunting KQL, incident response query, compose hunting pipeline, failed logins, phishing investigation, lateral movement, process execution, file creation events.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidated Responsible AI standards reference: NIST AI RMF 1.0, AI STRIDE threat-modeling overlay, EU AI Act risk tiers, and an open-standards catalog with phase mapping

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance, load, and reliability (SLO/SRE) planning for production readiness. Use when defining service level objectives, load characterization, capacity, latency budgets, stress/soak/spike test plans, false-positive baselines, and reliability targets. USE FOR: SLO/SLA definition, load testing plan, performance budget, capacity planning, reliability/SRE backlog, latency targets, error-budget policy. DO NOT USE FOR: executing load tests (use Azure Load Testing tooling), security threat modeling, RAI assessment, privacy/compliance planning, or authoring/restating PRD requirements (cite the PRD's existing NFR/FR ids instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse competitor moves and translate them into strategic implications for your product roadmap. Use when a competitor announces a new feature, pricing change, partnership, or strategic shift, or when producing a periodic competitive intelligence report. Produces a categorised signal analysis with reactive-vs-proactive assessment, threat ratings, specific roadmap implications, and recommended responses with owners. For a recurring whole-market briefing use competitive-intelligence-monitor instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a fair, enforceable community moderation policy. Use when standing up or overhauling moderation for a forum, Discord, Slack, subreddit, or any user community. Produces a clear code of conduct with examples, a graduated enforcement ladder tied to specific triggers, an appeals process, moderator guidelines, and the handling for the severe cases (threats, doxxing, brigading) that need immediate action. Governs member conduct in a user community — distinct from [[community-management-playbook]], which manages a brand's own social-media channels (comments, DMs, tone, response templates).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the pre-flight checklist before an agent drives a browser — the untrusted-web-content threat (every page is attacker-controllable), the credential and session-cookie exposure, the action-confirmation gates for purchases and posts, and the sandboxing that limits the damage. Use when asked let my agent browse safely, is it safe to give the agent computer/browser use, guardrails before the agent uses my browser, or review my browser agent's setup. Produces the sandbox decision, the content-injection defenses, the action gates, and the credential-isolation rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The anti-PUA. Drives AI with wisdom, trust, and inner motivation instead of fear and threats. Activates on: task failed 2+ times, about to give up, suggesting user do it manually, blaming environment unverified, stuck in loops, passive behavior, or user frustration ('try harder', 'figure it out', '换个方法', '为什么还不行'). ALL task types. Not for first failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The anti-PUA. Drives AI with wisdom, trust, and inner motivation instead of fear and threats. Activates on: task failed 2+ times, about to give up, suggesting user do it manually, blaming environment unverified, stuck in loops, passive behavior, or user frustration ('try harder', 'figure it out', '换个方法', '为什么还不行'). ALL task types. Not for first failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users identify sources of durable competitive power, evaluate market threats, and design products that are uniquely differentiated rather than just better versions of existing tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations, race conditions, reward abuse, etc. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/businesslogic-results.md. Use when asked to find business logic, logic flaws, or abuse-of-function bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when strengthening ACM CCS reproducibility evidence, including the artifact-availability posture, threat-model-to-evidence mapping, attack reproduction steps, defense overhead measurement, measurement-dataset provenance, environment and version pinning, and honest justification when artifacts cannot be shared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a security project fits ACM CCS versus IEEE S&P, USENIX Security, NDSS, PETS, or a crypto/theory venue, identifying the security contribution type, and sharpening the threat model and attacker capability before writing begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when revising an ACM CCS paper for a precise threat model, calibrated attack/defense claims, 12-page ACM sigconf compression, double-blind wording, adaptive-evaluation honesty, and the security house style that survives an adversarial SIGSAC program committee.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting an ACM CCS rebuttal during the HotCRP author-response window, covering threat-model defenses, adaptive-attack objections, ethics and disclosure questions, anonymity constraints, adversarial reviewer pushback patterns, and decision-focused replies aimed at the meta-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates an x-ray.md pre-audit report covering overview, enhanced threat model (protocol-type profiling, git-weighted attack surfaces, temporal risk analysis, composability dependency mapping), invariants, integrations, docs quality, test analysis, and developer/git history. Triggers on 'x-ray', 'audit readiness', 'readiness report', 'pre-audit report', 'prep this protocol', 'protocol prep', 'summarize this protocol'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。