2,065 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use when planning internal audits, executing audits, classifying findings, preparing for external audits, or managing an audit program.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Senior SecOps engineer skill for application security, vulnerability management, compliance verification, and secure development practices. Runs SAST/DAST scans, generates CVE remediation plans, checks dependency vulnerabilities, creates security policies, enforces secure coding patterns, and automates compliance checks against SOC2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR. Use when conducting a security review or audit, responding to a CVE or security incident, hardening infrastructure, implementing authentication or secrets management, running penetration test prep, checking OWASP Top 10 exposure, or enforcing security controls in CI/CD pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a Head of Ops, Knowledge Manager, or TPM-Internal needs to author, validate, or clean up company SOPs and internal runbooks (procurement intake, vendor offboarding, incident-comms cascade, employee onboarding) — including 5W2H completeness checks (Who-What-When-Where-Why-How-HowMuch), cross-link and orphan-page validation across a sprawling Notion/Confluence/Obsidian wiki, KB ingestion + hygiene reporting, and runbook step verification (named owner, expected duration, observable success signal, rollback path, escalation contact). Pairs Ishikawa's 5W2H method, Gawande's *The Checklist Manifesto*, ISO 9001, ITIL v4, and Google SRE Workbook runbook discipline with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools that score completeness, detect anti-patterns, and emit prioritized cleanup lists (e.g., "validate this runbook before it goes into rotation", "audit our Confluence wiki for stale and orphaned SOPs").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, and design repeatable AI-agent loops with explicit triggers, actions, verification, stopping conditions, guardrails, and handoffs. Use when a user asks to analyze a codebase for potential loops, mine coding-thread history for work done more than once, turn repeated engineering work into a loop, find or recommend a published loop, create a recurring agent workflow or automation cadence, turn an outcome into a bounded copy-ready loop, or review an existing loop for weak checks, unsafe authority, unbounded repetition, stale state, or unclear stopping behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-release checklist — build verification, certification requirements, store metadata, launch readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute a plan or concrete work prompt end-to-end. Use when implementing from a plan document, a spec path, or a clear build request; use ce-debug for open-ended bugs. Use when an outer orchestrator needs implementation and local verification only, without the shipping tail.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the tests, run one spec, run e2e locally or on Daytona, investigate a skipped spec. Use for executing @openwork/testkit agent-first verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cut an OpenSEO release — bump the version, draft user-facing release notes from commits since the last tag, run a review + subagent-verification pass, and open a "release: vX.X.X" PR. Use when the user asks to prepare a release, bump the version, or write release notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement, fix, refactor, or remove repository code under required scope, non-regression, verification, and review gates. Use whenever a task may change a production, test, script, or other implementation artifact, including build logic, generated source, and behavior-affecting configuration. Also use it alongside a specialized code-changing Skill. Do not use for read-only analysis or review, diagnosis-only work, or prose-only changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for every Kortix test task, behavior change, bug fix, refactor, API route change, CLI change, SDK change, browser journey, test failure, coverage question, local benchmark, or testing infrastructure change. Enforce the single local-first runner, black-box flow contracts, package-local SDK tests, browser-only Playwright tests, and real input/output verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Persistent-session, per-sweep QA runbook for {{target_repo}}. Discovers PRs since the last check, then for each one checks out the branch, runs the full verification suite, deploys the change to the test environment, exercises it through the edge, and posts a pass/fail result as a GitHub check and comment. Test environment only — no production access, no merge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Weekly dependency upgrade loop for {{target_repo}}. Scans for outdated packages, applies upgrades on an isolated branch, runs the full verification suite in the sandbox, handles breaking changes with documented migrations, and opens a PR only when everything is green.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legal document drafting -- contracts, memos, briefs, complaints, demand letters, opinions, discovery, settlements, ToS, privacy policies. Full pipeline: document structure, per-section writing, Bluebook citation, case law lookup (CourtListener API), regulation lookup (eCFR API), DOCX output, and TDD-style verification (defined terms, cross-references, placeholders, boilerplate, citation format). Triggers on: 'draft a contract', 'write a legal memo', 'create an NDA', 'write a brief', 'legal document about', 'draft a complaint', 'terms of service', 'privacy policy', 'demand letter', 'settlement agreement', 'legal opinion', 'discovery requests', any request to produce a legal or law-related document.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, audit, and improve harnesses that make AI coding agents reliable: AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md instruction files, feature/state tracking, verification gates, scope boundaries, session handoff, memory persistence, context budgets, tool-permission safety, and multi-agent coordination. Use this whenever a coding agent is unreliable across sessions — forgets context, drifts out of scope, claims "done" before tests pass, or starts each session inconsistently — or when creating or assessing AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, feature_list.json, init.sh, progress.md, or session-handoff files. Reach for it even if the user never says the word "harness."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Backend-specific Windows guidance for `computer_use_remote`. Load when a tool result reports backend_family/backend_id `windows` or Windows UI Automation features. Covers UIA structural targeting, Windows session caveats, and screenshot verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Host Linux guidance for `computer_use_remote` when results report Linux, Wayland, X11, or AT-SPI features. Covers verified focus, AT-SPI targeting, XWayland app limitations, remote desktop viewers, and screenshot verification; excludes the internal Docker/Xpra desktop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Backend-specific macOS guidance for `computer_use_remote`. Load when a tool result reports backend_family/backend_id `macos` or Accessibility-tree features. Covers AX structural targeting, macOS window actions, and screenshot verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Owns the Ideal State Artifact — the primitive holding a project or task's articulated ideal state; scaffolds, interviews, grills a half-formed idea into shape via checkpointed discovery, scores completeness, reconciles feature excerpts to master, seeds from a repo, and appends decisions/changelog/verification across a locked seventeen-section order. USE WHEN ISA, ISC, ideal state, ideal state criteria, project specification, hill-climb, articulating done, fog, not yet specified, grill me, discovery interview. NOT FOR creating new skills (use CreateSkill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assertion-first AI eval framework aligned to Anthropic's 'Demystifying evals for AI agents' — typed deterministic asserts + a forced-structured LLM judge over an input→assert case schema, pass^k/pass@k, capability vs regression suites, subscription-billed. USE WHEN eval, evaluate, benchmark, regression test, assertion, assert, llm-rubric, judge, pass@k, pass^k, grade output, compare prompts/models, test agent. NOT FOR scientific-method framing (use Science), property/mutation testing of code (use Hardening), or live UI verification (use Interceptor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drives cmux as an agent cockpit to boot, race, and monitor visible agent teams. Mac-only. USE WHEN cmux, agent cockpit, boot an agent team, orchestrate agents, three-tier orchestration, agent race, needle-in-haystack hotfix, agent fleet, 2x2 fleet, watch/monitor my agents, scale compute to scale impact, send a prompt to a running agent, multiplexer, terminal cockpit, orchestrator lead worker. NOT FOR one-shot in-harness subagents with no terminal to watch (use Agent/Workflow), the Pulse dashboard itself (cmux feeds it, use Pulse), browser deploy-verification (use Interceptor), or Linux/Windows (cmux is Mac-only — use tmux).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent web research with mandatory URL verification, confidence-tagged output, and four depth modes (quick to deep investigation). USE WHEN research, do research, quick research, extensive research, deep investigation, find information, investigate, extract alpha, analyze content, retrieve content, AI trends, enhance content, extract knowledge, web scraping, YouTube extraction, map landscape, competitive analysis, find it, find this, find this product, identify this, what is this, what's that thing, track down, locate, help me find, I can't find X online, can't find it online, source this — never substitute raw WebSearch/WebFetch for a multi-source find/identify/investigate request. NOT FOR people/company/entity deep background, academic papers (use ArXiv), JSON entity extraction, or content-adaptive wisdom extraction (use ExtractWisdom).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ethical people-finding and identity verification via parallel research agents across people-search sites, social media, public records, and reverse phone/email/image/username lookups, with confidence-scored results requiring 3+ matching identifiers. USE WHEN find person, locate person, reconnect, lost contact, old friend, reverse phone lookup, who owns this email, reverse image search, find by username, verify identity, people search, public-data background check, who is this caller. NOT FOR structured due-diligence or company/entity intelligence investigations, or general web research synthesis (use Research).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hardens LifeOS tests via property/mutation testing. USE WHEN harden, hardening, property test, property based testing, PBT, fast-check, mutation test, mutation testing, Stryker, CRAP score, CRAP analysis, DRY scan, jscpd, acceptance test mutation, strengthen tests, sharpen ISCs, find bugs example tests miss, universal quantified claim, shrink counterexample, what bugs am I missing, test the tests, test of the test. NOT FOR writing new feature tests (use bun test directly), grading agent output quality (use Evals), UI verification with real Chrome (use Interceptor), finding security vulnerabilities, or building new functionality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps intelligence for local SEO: geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification, competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation. Three tiers: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO, and DataForSEO + Google. Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", or "SoLV".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。