6,164 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Audit RuField tests, trust boundaries, privacy projections, and evidence promotion. Use for conformance review, security regression review, release validation, or checking whether field accuracy claims have support.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vets whether to build a feature from scratch, use an existing free/open-source solution, or pay for a third-party API/service. Use this whenever the user asks Claude to implement, add, integrate, or write code for a feature or capability, especially one that sounds like it could already be a solved problem (auth, payments, scraping, animation, comment/DM automation, video/image generation, search, notifications, etc.), even if the user doesn't explicitly ask "should I build or buy this." Make sure to trigger this before writing non-trivial implementation code for any feature-level capability, not just when the user asks about libraries directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft, expand, revise, structure, and maintain a full Islamic University of Technology BSc thesis from source documents using the local iutbscthesis LaTeX template. Use when writing or editing thesis metadata, front matter, abstract, chapters, related works, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, citations, appendices, figures, tables, code listings, or compile guidance for main.tex. Also use when the user expects an AI agent to turn papers, notes, PDFs, LaTeX sources, bib files, data tables, and assets into a substantial thesis manuscript chapter by chapter without requiring repeated babysitting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Flask web framework conventions: app factory pattern with create_app(), Blueprint registration with url_prefix, MethodView for class-based API views, Marshmallow schema validation, WTForms for HTML forms, Flask-Login for session auth, flask-jwt-extended for stateless API auth, Jinja2 template conventions, error handlers, and extension initialization. Activated automatically by flask-plugin/stack.md. Use this skill to: - Structure Flask applications with the app factory and per-feature Blueprints. - Validate JSON request data with Marshmallow and HTML forms with WTForms. - Implement session-based auth with Flask-Login or token auth with flask-jwt-extended. - Render Jinja2 templates safely or return JSON responses for API mode. - Register global error handlers for consistent error responses. Do NOT use this skill for: - SQLAlchemy ORM model patterns and Flask-Migrate — see flask-plugin:sqlalchemy-patterns. - Python language idioms — see python-foundation:python-conventions. - Testing patterns — see python-foundation:pytest-testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Django ORM patterns: model definitions, field types, model managers, custom QuerySet methods, select_related/prefetch_related for N+1 prevention, transactions, F/Q expressions, Meta indexes and constraints. For django-architect (model definitions) and django-migrations-specialist (field finalization). Activated automatically by django-plugin/stack.md. Use this skill to: - Write clean, efficient Django model definitions with proper field choices and __str__. - Use custom managers and QuerySets to encapsulate query logic. - Prevent N+1 queries with select_related and prefetch_related. - Use transactions for atomic operations. - Define Meta indexes and constraints (for django-migrations-specialist to finalize). Do NOT use this skill for: - Creating actual migrations (makemigrations) — that is django-migrations-specialist. - Web view / API patterns — see django-plugin:django-conventions. - Python idioms — see python-foundation:python-conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
React Server Components vs Client Components in Next.js: the boundary discipline, "use client" / "use server" directives, Server Actions, what serializes across the boundary, common pitfalls. Use this skill to: - Decide whether a component should be RSC or Client. - Push the "use client" boundary as deep as possible. - Implement Server Actions correctly (auth, validation, revalidation). - Compose RSC and Client components without breaking the model. - Pass data across the boundary safely. Do NOT use this skill for: - General Next.js conventions (see nextjs-conventions). - Specific data-fetching APIs and caching (see nextjs-data-fetching). - Routing (see nextjs-routing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-implementation self-review. Use AFTER finishing ANY code implementation or change — before declaring it done, committing, or opening a PR — to critique your own work: re-read the diff adversarially, confirm unit tests cover every branch/edge, kill duplication, follow clean-code/SOLID and the repo's own docs & invariants, decide if something should become documentation, update/prune memory, and strip outdated comments. Trigger it whenever you've just written or modified code and are about to wrap up, even if the user didn't explicitly ask for a review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial, security-first review of a pull request from an EXTERNAL or untrusted contributor — a fork PR, a first-time or unknown author, anyone without write access — before a maintainer merges it. Use this whenever you're reviewing, triaging, or deciding whether to merge a PR opened against tbh-meter by someone outside the maintainer team: 'review PR #123', 'someone opened a PR — is it safe to merge?', 'check this contributor's changes', 'can we take this fork PR?', 'is this contribution legit?'. This is supply-chain DEFENSE, not ordinary code review: every merged PR auto-updates onto every user's machine and ships a memory-reading .exe plus an unsandboxed Electron app, so the author and the PR description are UNTRUSTED and the diff is the only evidence. It posts its verdict as a real GitHub review — an inline comment pinned to each problematic line (via the pulls/reviews API), not just one summary comment. NOT for your own or a fellow maintainer's branch (use self-review for that), and prefer this over the generic review flow for anything coming from outside the team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to get found in Google or AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) — keyword and content strategy, technical or content SEO audits, schema markup, link building, topical clustering, E-E-A-T, AI citation (AEO), or deciding whether SEO is even the right channel for their startup. Calibrated for early-stage, low-authority sites. Not for paid acquisition or channel-mix/CAC analysis (use channel-expert), or writing the page copy itself (use copywriter-skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Put one settled thing in the user's head, plainly. Use when the user does not hold something already settled.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define how unsupervised work is judged before it runs. Use when work will run without a human watching, optimizing toward something.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build the thing the user can't specify, choices surfaced. Use when the user needs something to react to before they can choose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a walkthrough the user works through until they can pass a quiz on it. Use when the user needs to understand something deeply and be quizzed on it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a world the human drives until how a thing behaves is intuitive. Use when the user needs to hold how something behaves and reading has not made it intuitive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draw out what the user holds but can't say. Use when the user knows something they cannot yet express.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to execute or investigate a PromQL expression against a Prometheus server. Read-only HTTP queries only. No source or remote-system changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user explicitly says to save something to memory or scan this session for memories. Not for auditing memory: use memory-clean.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evaluating whether a bug issue has sufficient detail and identifying missing reporter information. Not for non-bug issues or backlog triage: use github-backlog-triage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to remove old code, migrate consumers, or decide whether to maintain or sunset a system. Not for untracked data or changes without VCS rollback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design guide + benchmarked pitfalls for building Monte-Carlo / Simulated Annealing refinement layers on top of greedy hex-grid layouts for code visualization (packages/gui/src/store/hexLayout.ts, sandbox/hex-sandbox, future Rust ports). Use when: (1) planning to add MC/SA on top of an existing hex-grid pack, (2) deciding whether a simpler SA would match a hierarchical MC with force-directed + chain drag, (3) budgeting wall-clock for million-node cold-start, (4) debugging "blob turns Swiss-cheese" or "folders stop nucleating" during MC refinement, (5) choosing between folder cohesion and raw Σ-link-length as cost function. Contains four hard-won, quantified lessons and anti-patterns that would take a full day of experiments to rediscover.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Continuous self-reflection routine combining Schön (reflection-in-action / reflection-on-action) and Mezirow (content / process / premise) levels, anchored on KAMI values (val-002 глубина, val-007 честность перед собой, принцип 1 правда, принцип 2 нулевая толерантность к бреду). Triggers FIRE DURING THE TURN, not at end. Use when: (1) about to make a 2nd+ patch attempt at the same problem, (2) user pushes back with "стоп / нет / опять / так, ещё раз / не то / пиздёж", (3) noticing self drifting into "I think that..." without evidence, (4) about to report "готово", (5) copying a pattern from one place to another, (6) task took >2× expected time. Embeds scientific method (explicit hypotheses + falsifiability + prediction-first + alternatives) as substrate for premise-level reflection, not as ceremony.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fires after fixing any non-trivial bug or regression. Asks: could the graph have caught this as a guarantee? Pairs with reflection-in-and-on-action — picks up after "earliest catchable signal" and asks the next question: was that signal expressible in graph? Triggers: (1) after any non-trivial bug fix is verified working, (2) after a regression report (something used to work, broke), (3) during step 6 (knowledge extraction) of the workflow, (4) when reflection-on-action surfaces a "would have been catchable" signal. Outcome is a triage decision (graph-reachable? rule expressible? rule sound?) and either a draft Linear issue + guarantee proposal, or a recorded "graph capability gap" note. Never auto-creates guarantees.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix silent incorrect results in RFDB Datalog queries that share a variable between two edge atoms on opposite ends (e.g. self-join patterns like `edge(M, C, "T1"), edge(C, M, "T2")`). Use when: (1) a Datalog rule returns rows that look structurally wrong (e.g. a self-loop rule reports hits but pinning M to each reported id refutes the edge existence), (2) Cypher `MATCH (m)-[:R1]->(c)-[:R2]->(m)` returns the same bogus rows (engine-level bug, not Datalog-specific), (3) results change when you bind one variable explicitly vs. leave it free. Root cause: hash- join fast path in `eval_edge_hash_join` / `eval_incoming_hash_join` unconditionally rebinds the non-key Term::Var without checking whether the variable is already bound in the current row.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates interactive HTML playgrounds — self-contained single-file explorers that let users configure something visually through controls, see a live preview, and copy out a prompt. Use when the user asks to make a playground, explorer, or interactive tool for a topic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。