「fea」の検索結果

Wireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons / Mana evil twin attacks, captive-portal phishing, KRACK and FragAttacks, WPS Pixie Dust, deauthentication and disassociation attacks, rogue AP construction (hostapd-mana), 802.1X bypass, MAC randomization defeat, BLE/Zigbee/IEEE 802.15.4 sidebands, and Wi-Fi 6/6E/7 considerations. Use when scoping wireless pentest, war-driving an estate, or testing corporate wireless segmentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evil Twin / KARMA / Mana access point methodology — rogue AP construction with hostapd-mana / wifiphisher / airgeddon, KARMA universal probe response, Mana selective probe response, captive portal phishing, deauth-driven client coercion to attacker AP, MAC randomization defeat via PNL leak analysis, post-association MITM (DNS, ARP, transparent proxy), credential capture for portal/web/SMB, and detection-evasion tactics. Use to coerce client devices onto an attacker-controlled AP, intercept their traffic, harvest credentials, or deliver payloads via captive portal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt Host Header Injection — password reset poisoning → ATO, web cache poisoning via unkeyed Host/X-Forwarded-Host, routing-based SSRF (Host picks upstream → cloud metadata/internal services), path-override SSRF/ACL-bypass (X-Original-URL/X-Rewrite-URL), OAuth redirect_uri/issuer poisoning, and absolute-URL link poisoning in emails. High to Critical when it reaches ATO or mass cache poisoning. Built on public Host-header research (PortSwigger 'Practical web cache poisoning' + James Kettle, and the classic password-reset-poisoning class). Use on any forgot-password flow, CDN/reverse-proxy-fronted app, OAuth/OIDC endpoint, or absolute-URL-in-email feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt WebSocket vulnerabilities — Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH), missing/weak Origin validation on the WS handshake, no per-message authentication, message tampering, socket.io namespace/room authorization bypass, and handshake-layer Upgrade smuggling. Use when target has WebSocket endpoints (ws:// or wss://), socket.io / SignalR / Phoenix Channels, real-time features, chat, live dashboards, notifications, or trading platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunting skill for graphql vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports across IDOR via node() / GID, mutation IDOR including AI/LLM features, cross-tenant IDOR, SSRF via argument, batching-DoS, query-cost-bypass, SQLi via argument, broken-object-level-authz, auth-bypass via unscoped mutations, and PII exposure from missing field-level authz. Use when hunting graphql on any target.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Business logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Anti-forensics and evidence destruction techniques for red team operators conducting authorized engagements. Covers log clearing on Windows (wevtutil, Clear-EventLog, ETW provider patching) and Linux (journal truncation, utmp/wtmp binary editing, syslog manipulation), timestamp manipulation via Timestomp and SetMACE to defeat timeline analysis, filesystem-level anti-forensics including NTFS Alternate Data Streams for payload hiding and secure deletion with sdelete/shred, memory artifact removal to counter live forensics, disk artifact manipulation targeting MFT entries and USN journal records, network forensics evasion through encrypted C2 channels and DNS-over-HTTPS tunneling, and anti-VM/sandbox detection to avoid dynamic analysis environments. Tools: Timestomp, wevtutil, sdelete, shred, MimiPenguin, Invoke-Phant0m. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1070 (Indicator Removal), T1027 (Obfuscated Files or Information), T1497 (Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion). Each technique includes the forensic artifact it targets, t...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A high-performance browser automation tool and MCP server written in Rust, featuring headless Chrome control and DOM manipulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A comprehensive skill for using the Cursor CLI agent for various software engineering tasks (updated for 2026 features, includes tmux automation guide).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," or "CTA copy." For email copy, see email-sequence. For popup copy, see popup-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clawdbot documentation expert with decision tree navigation, search scripts, doc fetching, version tracking, and config snippets for all Clawdbot features

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "intercept HTTP traffic", "modify web requests", "use Burp Suite for testing", "perform web vulnerability scanning", "test with Burp Repeater", "analyze HTTP history", or "configure proxy for web testing". It provides comprehensive guidance for using Burp Suite's core features for web application security testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks and analyzes competitor moves — pricing changes, feature launches, hiring, and positioning shifts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast X Intelligence CLI (Rust) — search, analyze, and engage on X/Twitter from the terminal. Use when: (1) user says "x research", "search x for", "search twitter for", "what are people saying about", "what's twitter saying", "check x for", "x search", "search x", (2) user wants real-time monitoring with "watch", (3) user needs AI-powered analysis with Grok ("analyze", "sentiment"), (4) user needs intelligence reports ("report"), (5) user wants to track followers ("diff"), (6) user needs trending topics ("trends"). Also supports: bookmarks, likes, following (OAuth), x-search, collections, CSV/JSON/JSONL export. Non-goals: Not for posting tweets, not for DMs, not for enterprise features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

X Intelligence CLI — search, analyze, and engage on X/Twitter from the terminal. Use when: (1) user says "x research", "search x for", "search twitter for", "what are people saying about", "what's twitter saying", "check x for", "x search", "search x", "find tweets about", "monitor x for", "track followers", (2) user is working on something where recent X discourse would provide useful context (new library releases, API changes, product launches, cultural events, industry drama), (3) user wants to find what devs/experts/community thinks about a topic, (4) user needs real-time monitoring ("watch"), (5) user wants AI-powered analysis ("analyze", "sentiment", "report"). Also supports: bookmarks, likes, following (read/write), trending topics, Grok AI analysis, and cost tracking. Export as JSON, JSONL (pipeable), CSV, or Markdown. Non-goals: Not for posting tweets, not for DMs, not for enterprise features. Requires OAuth for user-context operations (bookmarks, likes, following, diff).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Turn an article, doc or release note into a short explainer clip — one person to camera, or a voiceover over illustrative footage. The user supplies the source text and the model generates the speech; audio cannot be uploaded, measured. A 30-second clip holds about eighty spoken words in eight sentences — measured, and well under a tenth of a 1,200-word post — so this skill does not summarise an article, it picks the single idea worth saying and helps choose which one. Use when a user asks to turn writing into a short spoken video, e.g. "make a 30-second explainer from this blog post", "explain this feature in a short video", "turn our changelog into a clip", "a quick video explaining what this paper found". Do not use for a scene between people (see seedance-short-drama), a brand or product ad (see seedance-ad-creative), a handheld creator clip (see ugc-ads), or when the user already has both a portrait and the finished words (see talking-head). Budget sentences as well as words — each sentence boundary costs about 0.7 seconds of silence, so a script with more sentences runs longer at the same word count.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides collaborative requirements discovery before implementation. Creates task directory, seeds PRD, asks high-value questions one at a time, researches technical choices, and converges on MVP scope. Use when requirements are unclear, there are multiple valid approaches, or the user describes a new feature or complex task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive Chrome via the claude-in-chrome MCP to exercise plan.md::Verify steps for a shipped feature. Loads deferred MCP tool schemas, asserts console/network cleanliness, records a GIF for the PR. Used by the browser-verifier agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when closing out a feature, tidying developing/ documentation, or asked to check docs health — runs the lifecycle linter and applies the README deletion rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。