「source」の検索結果

Capture, gate, query, and render long-term project knowledge through the gated `mewkit wiki` subsystem. Use to create a wiki, propose/approve candidates (scanner-gated), hand off a skill's terminal artifact as a scanned candidate, recall context, search the FTS index, or list pages. Agents may only PROPOSE candidates; canonical pages are written only via human approve. NOT for short-lived JSON memory (see mk:memory); NOT for fetching external sources (see mk:wiki-research); NOT for HTML snapshots (see mk:wiki-render).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or update docs/project-context.md — the single source of truth for project conventions, tech stack, and anti-patterns. Loaded by all agents as a "constitution" to ensure consistent behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and safely evolve data models, database schemas, migrations, queries, indexes, and ORM data-access boundaries. Use for data-model, migration, query, index, ORM schema, or datastore-selection tasks. Discover the existing engine and migration source before proposing syntax.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when answering factual or explanatory questions about the current project — codebase, architecture, conventions, workflows, constraints — with minimal cited evidence. Triggers on "how does X work here", "what does X mean", "why is X structured this way", "is this claim true in the repo", "explain X with sources". NOT for brainstorming or comparing approaches (mk:brainstorming), trade-off decisions (mk:party), debugging/root cause (mk:investigate), code review (mk:review), plans (mk:plan-creator), security audits (mk:cso), visual explanations/diagrams (mk:preview --explain), test-coverage gaps (mk:nyquist), library docs (mk:docs-finder), or workflow navigation (mk:help).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use RoutIR — call a running endpoint with the client, stand up a local server that mixes locally-hosted services with services proxied from a remote master server, and extend RoutIR with new bi-encoders, rerankers, and document collections by writing a small config (and optionally one Python file referenced via `file_imports`). No checkout of the routir source is required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update agents from external sources (GitHub, docs, etc.)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the project wiki as RAG knowledge source — search wiki pages to answer codebase questions before exploring raw files

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect reviewed Grafana infrastructure evidence for host or fleet CPU usage, memory load, disk space, and system load. Use for server-health checks, capacity symptoms, resource saturation, disk pressure, cloud or local host comparisons, and bounded infrastructure triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review approved Grafana business-intelligence evidence for revenue, conversion, and operational KPIs. Use for bounded KPI scorecards, financial or operational metric checks, baseline comparisons, and business-unit reviews without changing source systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare, submit and reconcile reviewed Fusion Automation jobs with exact sources, scoped authorization and explicit budgets. Not for arbitrary model-generated cloud scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a traceable local Fusion engineering review draft with source identities, artifacts and unresolved assurance gates. Not for sending, publication or release approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document-driven workflow for implementing, reviewing, and verifying Chisel processor and memory-subsystem RTL. Use when Codex must work from maintained Architecture and Design, trace a complete integration surface, reason in synthesized-hardware terms, keep source-adjacent _codex.md summaries current, avoid redundant or overprotective logic, or run focused functional verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and optimize timing-critical Chisel RTL for FPGA implementation while preserving cycle semantics. Use for Vivado timing bottlenecks, long ready or admission paths, queue and issue selection, free-list bank mapping, priority encoders, one-hot arbitration, wide muxes, late-arriving forwarding or override data, high-fanout controls, cross-module predicates, register-boundary changes, emitted-Verilog inspection, or routed-DCP A/B analysis. Also use when a source-level simplification needs proof that it changes timing without changing architectural state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize or safely upgrade a processor project's root AGENTS.md from a maintained baseline. Use when starting a processor project, adding project-level Agent collaboration rules, or comparing an existing AGENTS.md with the package baseline. This skill only handles AGENTS.md; it does not scaffold documentation, inspect or configure environments, install tools, or modify processor source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantic search, grep, and Q&A across codebases and documentation indexed in CodeAlive. Use when the user mentions "CodeAlive", asks to list or get data sources, list indexed repositories, search code or docs across remote repos, fetch artifact content, or trace call graphs across repositories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Mastra framework guide for building agents, workflows, tools, memory, workspaces, and storage with current APIs. Use for documentation lookup, API verification, TypeScript setup, common errors, migrations, and `mastra api` CLI tasks: inspect or call resources on local, Mastra platform, Trace Intelligence, or remote servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Passive, pattern-calibrated risk discovery for authorized security research over an open-source project, repository URL, dependency, release, or local checkout. Use when the security research agent needs to find highest-risk areas, map attack surface, identify likely bug-hunting targets, prioritize security review, inspect structural/logical/security-critical code, compare vulnerable versus patched versions, reason from broad high-severity vulnerability families, or remember areas of interest for later attack-chain research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Passive code-review lane for authorized repositories, local checkouts, uploaded source archives, and diffs. Use when the security research agent needs deterministic candidate discovery before expensive AI investigation, scoped PR-style review, append-only evidence records, or independent revalidation of code findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Passive, citation-grounded review of security-relevant specifications, protocols, standards, APIs, and implementations. Use when a reviewer must trace external preconditions and invariants into source code without treating a cited claim as proof of a vulnerability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Offload builds, tests, or artifact verification to authorized SSH hosts and isolated worktrees; synchronize remote fixes into dedicated coordinator commits and preserve reproducible build provenance. Use for spare development capacity and remote build troubleshooting. Paid provisioning requires a separate resource lifecycle contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode - think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。